• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定量血流比评估急性冠脉综合征罪犯病变外非罪犯病变的可行性和诊断可靠性。

Feasibility and diagnostic reliability of quantitative flow ratio in the assessment of non-culprit lesions in acute coronary syndrome.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.

DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jun;37(6):1815-1823. doi: 10.1007/s10554-021-02195-2. Epub 2021 Mar 2.

DOI:10.1007/s10554-021-02195-2
PMID:33651231
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8255265/
Abstract

Several studies have demonstrated the feasibility and safety of hemodynamic assessment of non-culprit coronary arteries in setting of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) using fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements. Quantitative flow ratio (QFR), recently introduced as angiography-based fast FFR computation, has been validated with good agreement and diagnostic performance with FFR in chronic coronary syndromes. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and diagnostic reliability of QFR assessment during primary PCI. A total of 321 patients with ACS and multivessel disease, who underwent primary PCI and were planned for staged PCI of at least one non-culprit lesion were enrolled in the analysis. Within this patient cohort, serial post-hoc QFR analyses of 513 non-culprit vessels were performed. The median time interval between primary and staged PCI was 49 [42-58] days. QFR in non-culprit coronary arteries did not change between acute and staged measurements (0.86 vs 0.87, p = 0.114), with strong correlation (r = 0.94, p ≤ 0.001) and good agreement (mean difference -0.008, 95%CI -0.013-0.003) between measurements. Importantly, QFR as assessed at index procedure had sensitivity of 95.02%, specificity of 93.59% and diagnostic accuracy of 94.15% in prediction of QFR ≤ 0.80 at the time of staged PCI. The present study for the first time confirmed the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of non-culprit coronary artery QFR during index procedure for ACS. These results support QFR as valuable tool in patients with ACS to detect further hemodynamic relevant lesions with excellent diagnostic performance and therefore to guide further revascularisation therapy.

摘要

多项研究已经证明,在急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者中使用血流储备分数(FFR)测量评估非罪犯血管的血流动力学是可行且安全的。定量血流比(QFR)是一种新的基于造影的快速 FFR 计算方法,在慢性冠脉综合征中与 FFR 具有良好的一致性和诊断性能。本研究旨在评估在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)期间进行 QFR 评估的可行性和诊断可靠性。共纳入 321 例 ACS 合并多支血管病变患者,这些患者接受了直接 PCI 治疗,并计划对至少一支非罪犯病变进行分期 PCI。在这个患者队列中,对 513 支非罪犯血管进行了一系列 QFR 后分析。直接 PCI 与分期 PCI 之间的中位数时间间隔为 49[42-58]天。非罪犯冠状动脉的 QFR 在急性和分期测量之间没有变化(0.86 比 0.87,p=0.114),具有很强的相关性(r=0.94,p≤0.001)和良好的一致性(平均差异-0.008,95%可信区间-0.013-0.003)。重要的是,在预测分期 PCI 时 QFR≤0.80 的情况下,指数检查时的 QFR 具有 95.02%的敏感性、93.59%的特异性和 94.15%的诊断准确性。本研究首次证实了在 ACS 患者的指数检查期间评估非罪犯冠状动脉 QFR 的可行性和诊断准确性。这些结果支持 QFR 作为一种有价值的工具,用于 ACS 患者检测进一步的血流动力学相关病变,具有出色的诊断性能,从而指导进一步的血运重建治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64f6/8255265/4f0c05fc9ac0/10554_2021_2195_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64f6/8255265/0e92e4b85b26/10554_2021_2195_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64f6/8255265/2de037f53f2c/10554_2021_2195_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64f6/8255265/4f0c05fc9ac0/10554_2021_2195_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64f6/8255265/0e92e4b85b26/10554_2021_2195_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64f6/8255265/2de037f53f2c/10554_2021_2195_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64f6/8255265/4f0c05fc9ac0/10554_2021_2195_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Feasibility and diagnostic reliability of quantitative flow ratio in the assessment of non-culprit lesions in acute coronary syndrome.定量血流比评估急性冠脉综合征罪犯病变外非罪犯病变的可行性和诊断可靠性。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jun;37(6):1815-1823. doi: 10.1007/s10554-021-02195-2. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
2
Prognostic Impact of Pancoronary Quantitative Flow Ratio Assessment in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中冠状动脉定量血流比值评估的预后影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Dec;14(12):e010698. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.010698. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
3
Clinical Value of Single-Projection Angiography-Derived FFR in Noninfarct-Related Artery.单投影血管造影衍生的 FFR 在非梗死相关动脉中的临床价值。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 May;17(5):e013844. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013844. Epub 2024 May 21.
4
Clinical implication of QFR in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after drug-eluting stent implantation.药物洗脱支架置入术后 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者血流储备分数的临床意义。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Mar;37(3):755-766. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-02068-0. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
5
Diagnostic performance and limitation of quantitative flow ratio for functional assessment of intermediate coronary stenosis.用于评估中度冠状动脉狭窄功能的定量血流比率的诊断性能及局限性
J Cardiol. 2021 May;77(5):492-499. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2020.11.002. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
6
Diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes in comparison to non-hyperemic pressure ratios: a prospective study.定量血流比在非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征与非充血性压力比的诊断性能比较:一项前瞻性研究。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 Dec;39(12):2567-2574. doi: 10.1007/s10554-023-02967-y. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
7
Angiography-derived functional assessment of non-culprit coronary stenoses in primary percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中罪犯病变外冠状动脉狭窄的血管造影功能评估。
EuroIntervention. 2020 Apr 3;15(18):e1594-e1601. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01165.
8
QFR Assessment and Prognosis After Nonculprit PCI in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死患者非罪犯病变 PCI 后 QFR 评估及预后。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Oct 9;16(19):2365-2379. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.08.032.
9
Quantitative flow ratio virtual stenting and post stenting correlations to post stenting fractional flow reserve measurements from the DOCTORS (Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Results of Stenting) study population.定量血流比虚拟支架和支架置入后与 DOCTORS 研究人群支架置入后分数流量储备测量的相关性(光学相干断层成像是否优化支架治疗结果)。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov;96(6):1145-1153. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28615. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
10
Diagnostic Performance of In-Procedure Angiography-Derived Quantitative Flow Reserve Compared to Pressure-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: The FAVOR II Europe-Japan Study.术中血管造影衍生的定量血流储备与压力衍生的分数流量储备的诊断性能比较:FAVOR II 欧洲-日本研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jul 6;7(14):e009603. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009603.

引用本文的文献

1
Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Complete vs Culprit-Only Revascularization in Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: The SLIM Randomized Clinical Trial.非ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变中,血流储备分数指导下的完全血运重建与仅罪犯血管血运重建的比较:SLIM随机临床试验
JAMA. 2025 Aug 31. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.16189.
2
Prognostic Value of Postpercutaneous Coronary Intervention Murray-Law-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio: Post Hoc Analysis From FLAVOUR Trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后基于Murray定律的定量血流比的预后价值:来自FLAVOUR试验的事后分析
JACC Asia. 2025 Jan 7;5(1):59-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2024.10.019. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of quantitative flow ratio, Pd/Pa and diastolic hyperemia-free ratio versus fractional flow reserve in non-culprit lesion of patients with non ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者非罪犯病变中定量血流比、Pd/Pa和无舒张期充血比与血流储备分数的比较
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Nov 15;98(6):1057-1065. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29380. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
2
Lesson learnt from the new 2020 ESC guidelines on non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: when clinical judgement precedes and overpasses weak recommendations. 2020 non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome guidelines on pre-treatment: primum non nocere!从2020年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征新指南中学到的经验:当临床判断先于并超越微弱推荐时。2020年非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征预处理指南:首要的是不伤害!
Eur Heart J. 2021 Jul 8;42(26):2607-2608. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa861.
3
Clinical Updates in Coronary Artery Disease: A Comprehensive Review.
冠状动脉疾病的临床进展:全面综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 6;13(16):4600. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164600.
4
Intracoronary Diagnostics in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征患者的冠状动脉内诊断
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Feb 6;24(2):45. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2402045. eCollection 2023 Feb.
5
Quantitative flow ratio or angiography for the assessment of non-culprit lesions in acute coronary syndromes, a randomized trial.定量血流比或血管造影术用于评估急性冠状动脉综合征中的非罪犯病变:一项随机试验
Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 Jun;114(6):729-737. doi: 10.1007/s00392-024-02484-5. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
6
Murray law-based quantitative flow ratio for assessment of nonculprit lesions in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.基于 Murray 法则的定量血流比评估 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者罪犯病变以外的血管病变。
Cardiol J. 2024;31(4):522-527. doi: 10.5603/cj.93499. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
7
Prognostic role of discordance between quantitative flow ratio and visual estimation in revascularization guidance.定量血流比率与视觉评估不一致在血运重建指导中的预后作用。
Eur Heart J Open. 2023 Dec 26;4(1):oead125. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oead125. eCollection 2024 Jan.
8
Practical Application of Coronary Physiologic Assessment: Asia-Pacific Expert Consensus Document: Part 1.冠状动脉生理评估的实际应用:亚太专家共识文件:第1部分。
JACC Asia. 2023 Aug 29;3(5):689-706. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2023.07.003. eCollection 2023 Oct.
9
Diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes in comparison to non-hyperemic pressure ratios: a prospective study.定量血流比在非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征与非充血性压力比的诊断性能比较:一项前瞻性研究。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 Dec;39(12):2567-2574. doi: 10.1007/s10554-023-02967-y. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
10
Quantitative flow ratio-based outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation quaestio study.经导管主动脉瓣植入术Quaestio研究中基于定量血流比率的结果
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Aug 30;10:1188644. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1188644. eCollection 2023.
Survival of Patients With Angina Pectoris Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Intracoronary Pressure Wire Guidance.冠状动脉内压力导丝指导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗心绞痛患者的生存情况。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jun 9;75(22):2785-2799. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.018.
4
Fractional flow reserve-guided multivessel angioplasty in myocardial infarction: three-year follow-up with cost benefit analysis of the Compare-Acute trial.急性心肌梗死的多支血管 Fractional flow reserve 指导下的血管成形术:对比急性试验的 3 年随访及成本效益分析。
EuroIntervention. 2020 Jun 25;16(3):225-232. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00012.
5
Angiography-derived functional assessment of non-culprit coronary stenoses in primary percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中罪犯病变外冠状动脉狭窄的血管造影功能评估。
EuroIntervention. 2020 Apr 3;15(18):e1594-e1601. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01165.
6
2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes.2019年欧洲心脏病学会慢性冠状动脉综合征诊断和管理指南
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 14;41(3):407-477. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425.
7
Complete Revascularization with Multivessel PCI for Myocardial Infarction.多支血管 PCI 治疗心肌梗死的完全血运重建。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 10;381(15):1411-1421. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1907775. Epub 2019 Sep 1.
8
Quantitative flow ratio for immediate assessment of nonculprit lesions in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction-An iSTEMI substudy.定量血流比在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者非罪犯病变即刻评估中的应用:iSTEMI 亚研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Nov 1;94(5):686-692. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28208. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
9
Fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention vs. medical therapy for patients with stable coronary lesions: meta-analysis of individual patient data.基于个体患者数据的荟萃分析:冠状动脉狭窄稳定患者采用血流储备分数指导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与药物治疗的比较。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):180-186. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy812.
10
Comparison of resting distal to aortic coronary pressure with angiography-based quantitative flow ratio.与基于造影的定量血流比相比,静息时的远端主动脉冠状动脉压力。
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Mar 15;279:12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.11.093. Epub 2018 Nov 17.