Education Center, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Department of Pediatrics, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Crit Care Med. 2024 Apr 1;52(4):e193-e202. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006161. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
This systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of hydrocortisone combined with fludrocortisone or hydrocortisone alone, compared with placebo in adult patients with septic shock.
By extending a prior Cochrane review, databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov , along with other relevant websites, were searched until August 31, 2023.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies using target trial emulation were included.
The primary outcome was short-term mortality with an emphasis on 28- or 30-day mortality as the main measure and in-hospital or ICU mortality as the nearest surrogate of this measure. Three of the most common adverse events, namely, gastroduodenal bleeding, superinfection, and hyperglycemia, were also considered.
A total of 19 studies involving 95,841 patients were included. Hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone showed the lowest short-term mortality versus placebo (odds ratio [OR]: 0.79; 95% credible interval [CrI], 0.64-0.99; number needed to treat [NNT]: 21, range: 12-500; low certainty of evidence) in terms of informative priors. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve values for hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone, hydrocortisone alone, and placebo were 0.9469, 0.4542, and 0.0989, respectively. Consistent results were observed in RCTs alone and those using a daily 200-mg dose of hydrocortisone. Although gastroduodenal bleeding or superinfection showed no clear increase, hyperglycemia risk increased. The ORs were 0.53 for placebo versus hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone and 0.64 for placebo versus hydrocortisone alone, with very low certainty of evidence.
In adults with septic shock, hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone improved short-term survival with minimal adverse events compared with hydrocortisone alone or placebo. However, these findings are not definitive due to the limited certainty of evidence and wide NNT range. Additional large-scale, placebo-controlled RCTs are needed to provide conclusive evidence.
本系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析评估了氢化可的松联合氟氢可的松与单独使用氢化可的松相比,在成人脓毒性休克患者中的疗效和安全性。
通过扩展之前的 Cochrane 综述,检索了包括 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和 ClinicalTrials.gov 在内的数据库,以及其他相关网站,截至 2023 年 8 月 31 日。
纳入了随机对照试验(RCT)和使用目标试验模拟的观察性研究。
主要结局是短期死亡率,重点关注 28 天或 30 天死亡率作为主要指标,以及住院或 ICU 死亡率作为该指标的最近替代指标。还考虑了三种最常见的不良事件,即胃十二指肠出血、继发感染和高血糖。
共纳入 19 项研究,涉及 95841 名患者。与安慰剂相比,氢化可的松联合氟氢可的松显示出最低的短期死亡率(比值比 [OR]:0.79;95%可信区间 [CrI]:0.64-0.99;需要治疗的人数 [NNT]:21,范围:12-500;证据质量低),有信息性先验的支持。氢化可的松联合氟氢可的松、单独使用氢化可的松和安慰剂的累积排序曲线下面积值分别为 0.9469、0.4542 和 0.0989。仅在 RCT 中或每天使用 200mg 氢化可的松的研究中观察到一致的结果。尽管胃十二指肠出血或继发感染没有明显增加,但高血糖风险增加。与安慰剂相比,氢化可的松联合氟氢可的松的 OR 为 0.53,与单独使用氢化可的松的 OR 为 0.64,证据质量极低。
在成人脓毒性休克患者中,与单独使用氢化可的松或安慰剂相比,氢化可的松联合氟氢可的松可提高短期生存率,且不良事件较少。然而,由于证据确定性有限且 NNT 范围较宽,这些发现尚不确定。需要开展更大规模、安慰剂对照的 RCT 以提供确凿证据。