Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, 5-1-1 Nabeshima, Saga, Saga, 849-8501, Japan.
Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, 5-1-1 Nabeshima, Saga, Saga, 849-8501, Japan.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Dec 29;39(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04580-w.
PURPOSE: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a safe, effective, and promising analgesic procedure, but TAP block only cannot overcome postoperative pain. We conducted a prospective randomized study to evaluate postoperative pain control using multimodal analgesia (MA) combined with a single injection TAP block compared with epidural analgesia (EA) after laparoscopic colon cancer surgery. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic colon cancer surgery were enrolled in this study and randomized into EA and MA groups. The primary endpoint was the frequency of additional analgesic use until postoperative day (POD) 2. The VAS score, blood pressure, time to bowel movement, time to mobilization, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay were also compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients (EA group, n = 33; MA group, n = 31) were analyzed. The patient characteristics did not differ markedly between the two groups. The frequency of additional analgesic use was significantly lower in the MA group than in the EA group (P < 0.001), whereas the VAS score did not differ markedly between the two groups. The postoperative blood pressure on the day of surgery was significantly lower in the MA group than in the EA group (P = 0.016), whereas urinary retention was significantly higher in the EA group than in the MA group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: MA combined with a single injection TAP block after laparoscopic colon cancer surgery may be comparable to EA in terms of analgesia and superior to EA in terms of urinary retention.
目的:腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞是一种安全、有效且有前途的镇痛方法,但 TAP 阻滞不能完全缓解术后疼痛。我们进行了一项前瞻性随机研究,以评估与硬膜外镇痛(EA)相比,多模式镇痛(MA)联合单次 TAP 阻滞在腹腔镜结肠癌手术后的术后疼痛控制效果。
方法:本研究纳入了 67 例择期行腹腔镜结肠癌手术的患者,并将其随机分为 EA 组和 MA 组。主要终点是术后第 2 天之前需要额外使用镇痛药物的频率。还比较了两组之间的 VAS 评分、血压、肠蠕动时间、活动时间、术后并发症和住院时间。
结果:64 例患者(EA 组,n = 33;MA 组,n = 31)被纳入分析。两组患者的特征无明显差异。MA 组需要额外使用镇痛药物的频率明显低于 EA 组(P < 0.001),而两组的 VAS 评分无明显差异。MA 组在手术当天的术后血压明显低于 EA 组(P = 0.016),而 EA 组的尿潴留发生率明显高于 MA 组(P < 0.001)。
结论:与 EA 相比,腹腔镜结肠癌手术后 MA 联合单次 TAP 阻滞在镇痛方面可能相当,而在尿潴留方面优于 EA。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017-9
World J Gastroenterol. 2015-12-28