Suppr超能文献

对拉赫曼试验进行评估。一项临床观察的量化。

Lachman test evaluated. Quantification of a clinical observation.

作者信息

Gurtler R A, Stine R, Torg J S

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987 Mar(216):141-50.

PMID:3815941
Abstract

The Lachman test has become recognized as the most reliable noninvasive clinical method for determining the integrity of the anterior cruciate ligament. The original description provided for the test is reported as either positive or negative. The purpose of this study is to present a clinical grading system for positive examinations. The criteria are as follows: Grade I, proprioceptive appreciation of a positive test; Grade II, visible anterior translation of the tibia; Grade III, passive subluxation of the tibia with the patient supine; and Grade IV, ability of the patient with a cruciate-deficient knee to actively sublux the proximal tibia. Seventy-five patients with arthroscopically documented complete anterior cruciate ligament tears were examined clinically and graded using the above criteria. In addition, all patients had arthrometric examinations to measure the amount of anterior subluxation of the tibia in millimeters. A one-way analysis of variance followed by Scheffe multiple comparisons demonstrated the mean measurements of anterior displacement of the tibia in each laxity group to be significantly different.

摘要

拉赫曼试验已被公认为确定前交叉韧带完整性最可靠的非侵入性临床方法。最初对该试验的描述报告为阳性或阴性。本研究的目的是提出一种针对阳性检查结果的临床分级系统。标准如下:I级,对阳性试验有本体感觉;II级,胫骨可见向前移位;III级,患者仰卧时胫骨被动半脱位;IV级,患有交叉韧带损伤膝关节的患者能够主动使胫骨近端半脱位。对75例经关节镜证实为前交叉韧带完全撕裂的患者进行了临床检查,并根据上述标准进行分级。此外,所有患者均进行了关节测量检查,以毫米为单位测量胫骨向前半脱位的程度。采用单因素方差分析及谢费多重比较,结果显示各松弛度组胫骨前移的平均测量值有显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验