Maestro Antonio, Rodríguez Nicolás, Pipa Iván, Toyos Carmen, Lanuza Lucía, Machado Filipe, Castaño César, Maestro Santiago
Hospital Begoña, 33204 Gijón, Spain.
Hospital Cruz Roja de Gijón, 33202 Gijón, Spain.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jan 14;61(1):116. doi: 10.3390/medicina61010116.
: Up to 27% of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction cases result in a residual positive pivot shift sign, indicating anteroposterior and rotational instability. This instability can compromise returning to sports and increase the risk of further injuries. The biomechanical role of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) in controlling internal knee rotation is well known. However, there are no clinical trials comparing isolated ACL repairs to those combined with ALL reconstruction. Our objective is to compare the results of these techniques, with a primary focus on assessing knee stability and graft survival, to provide evidence for optimizing surgical approaches, particularly for athletes and physically active individuals. : An observational study using paired score matching as a method of pseudo-randomization was conducted. Subjects were divided into an ACL group and an ACL+ALL group. Demographic and clinical variables were collected, as well as those related to complications and survival. : A total of 236 patients were included, which was reduced to 74 ACL and 37 ACL+ALL after pseudo-randomization, resulting in preoperatively comparable groups. During follow-up, differences in favor of ALL reinforcement were found on the pivot shift test ( = 0.007). No differences were found with regard to the Lachman test ( = 0.201), the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) knee score ( = 0.169), the IKDC subjective score ( = 0.095), intensity of pain ( = 0.928), or complications ( = 0.529). Nor were differences found in the limb symmetry index; the single hop test ( = 0.710); the triple hop test ( = 0.653); the crossover hop test ( = 0.682); the 6 meter timed hop test ( = 0.360); the normalized Y-balance test (YBT) ( = 0.459 anterior; = 0.898 posterolateral; and = 0.211 posteromedial directions); or the limb symmetry index of the composite YBT ( = 0.488). There were no differences either with respect to return to sports practice ( = 0.723) or survival ( = 0.798). : Patients treated by means of the ACL+ALL technique obtained higher rotational stability, as measured by the pivot shift test, than those subjected to an isolated ACL repair. No differences were found with respect to Lachman test, complications, IKDC, pain, or survival.
高达27%的前交叉韧带(ACL)重建病例会残留阳性轴移征,表明存在前后向和旋转不稳定。这种不稳定会影响患者恢复运动,并增加进一步受伤的风险。前外侧韧带(ALL)在控制膝关节内旋方面的生物力学作用已为人熟知。然而,尚无临床试验比较单纯ACL修复与联合ALL重建的效果。我们的目的是比较这些技术的结果,主要关注评估膝关节稳定性和移植物存活情况,为优化手术方法提供依据,特别是针对运动员和体力活动较多的个体。
开展了一项观察性研究,采用配对评分匹配作为一种伪随机化方法。将受试者分为ACL组和ACL+ALL组。收集了人口统计学和临床变量,以及与并发症和存活相关的变量。
共纳入236例患者,伪随机化后减少至74例ACL组和37例ACL+ALL组,从而形成术前可比的组。在随访期间,轴移试验显示有利于ALL加强的差异(P = 0.007)。在Lachman试验(P = 0.201)、国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)膝关节评分(P = 0.169)、IKDC主观评分(P = 0.095)、疼痛强度(P = 0.928)或并发症(P = 0.529)方面未发现差异。在肢体对称指数、单跳试验(P = 0.710)、三跳试验(P = 0.653)、交叉跳试验(P = 0.682)、6米定时跳试验(P = 0.360)、标准化Y平衡试验(YBT)(前侧P = 0.459;后外侧P = 0.898;后内侧P = 0.211方向)或复合YBT的肢体对称指数(P = 0.488)方面也未发现差异。在恢复运动实践(P = 0.723)或存活(P = 0.798)方面也没有差异。
通过ACL+ALL技术治疗的患者,通过轴移试验测量,比接受单纯ACL修复的患者获得了更高的旋转稳定性。在Lachman试验、并发症、IKDC、疼痛或存活方面未发现差异。