Suppr超能文献

帕博利珠单抗联合伊匹单抗或安慰剂用于 PD-L1 肿瘤比例评分≥50%的转移性非小细胞肺癌:随机、双盲、III 期 KEYNOTE-598 研究。

Pembrolizumab Plus Ipilimumab or Placebo for Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score ≥ 50%: Randomized, Double-Blind Phase III KEYNOTE-598 Study.

机构信息

Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.

Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Faculty of Medicine and Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jul 20;39(21):2327-2338. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.03579. Epub 2021 Jan 29.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Pembrolizumab monotherapy is standard first-line therapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥ 50% without actionable driver mutations. It is not known whether adding ipilimumab to pembrolizumab improves efficacy over pembrolizumab alone in this population.

METHODS

In the randomized, double-blind, phase III KEYNOTE-598 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03302234), eligible patients with previously untreated metastatic NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% and no sensitizing or aberrations were randomly allocated 1:1 to ipilimumab 1 mg/kg or placebo every 6 weeks for up to 18 doses; all participants received pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks for up to 35 doses. Primary end points were overall survival and progression-free survival.

RESULTS

Of the 568 participants, 284 were randomly allocated to each group. Median overall survival was 21.4 months for pembrolizumab-ipilimumab versus 21.9 months for pembrolizumab-placebo (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.37; = .74). Median progression-free survival was 8.2 months for pembrolizumab-ipilimumab versus 8.4 months for pembrolizumab-placebo (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.30; = .72). Grade 3-5 adverse events occurred in 62.4% of pembrolizumab-ipilimumab recipients versus 50.2% of pembrolizumab-placebo recipients and led to death in 13.1% versus 7.5%. The external data and safety monitoring committee recommended that the study be stopped for futility and that participants discontinue ipilimumab and placebo.

CONCLUSION

Adding ipilimumab to pembrolizumab does not improve efficacy and is associated with greater toxicity than pembrolizumab monotherapy as first-line treatment for metastatic NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% and no targetable or aberrations. These data do not support use of pembrolizumab-ipilimumab in place of pembrolizumab monotherapy in this population.

摘要

目的

帕博利珠单抗单药治疗是无驱动基因突变、肿瘤程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)肿瘤比例评分(TPS)≥50%的转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的标准一线治疗方法。然而,对于这一人群,在帕博利珠单抗的基础上联合伊匹单抗是否能提高疗效尚不清楚。

方法

在这项随机、双盲、III 期 KEYNOTE-598 试验(ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT03302234)中,入组了 568 例未经治疗的、PD-L1 TPS≥50%且无敏感或致病变异的转移性 NSCLC 患者,按 1:1 随机分配接受伊匹单抗 1 mg/kg 或安慰剂,每 6 周 1 次,最多 18 个剂量;所有患者均接受帕博利珠单抗 200 mg,每 3 周 1 次,最多 35 个剂量。主要终点为总生存期和无进展生存期。

结果

在 568 例患者中,284 例患者随机分配至两组。与帕博利珠单抗-安慰剂相比,帕博利珠单抗-伊匹单抗组的中位总生存期为 21.4 个月(风险比,1.08;95%CI,0.85 至 1.37;P=0.74)。中位无进展生存期为 8.2 个月(风险比,1.06;95%CI,0.86 至 1.30;P=0.72)。帕博利珠单抗-伊匹单抗组 62.4%的患者和帕博利珠单抗-安慰剂组 50.2%的患者发生了 3 级或 5 级不良事件,13.1%的患者和 7.5%的患者因不良事件导致死亡。外部数据和安全监测委员会建议,该研究因无效而停止,并且建议所有患者停止使用伊匹单抗和安慰剂。

结论

与帕博利珠单抗单药治疗相比,帕博利珠单抗联合伊匹单抗并未提高疗效,反而导致毒性增加,不适合作为 PD-L1 TPS≥50%且无靶向或致病变异的转移性 NSCLC 的一线治疗方法。这些数据不支持在这一人群中用帕博利珠单抗-伊匹单抗替代帕博利珠单抗单药治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验