Suppr超能文献

哌柏西利和瑞博西尼在IV期激素受体阳性/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性乳腺癌中的有效性和安全性:一项全国性真实世界比较性回顾性队列研究。

The effectiveness and safety of palbociclib and ribociclib in stage IV HR+/HER-2 negative breast cancer: a nationwide real world comparative retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Al-Ziftawi Nour Hisham, Elazzazy Shereen, Alam Mohammed Fasihul, Shafie Asrul, Hamad Anas, Bbujassoum Salha, Mohamed Ibrahim Mohamed Izham

机构信息

Pharmacy Department, Aman Hospital, Doha, Qatar.

Pharmacy Department, The National Center for Cancer Care and Research, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2023 Dec 15;13:1203684. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1203684. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Palbociclib and ribociclib are indicated in the first-line treatment of hormonal receptor-positive HER-2 negative (HR+/HER2- negative) advanced breast cancer. Although randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) proved their clinical efficacy, there are no observational studies yet to validate the clinical findings in the real-world. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical effectiveness and safety profiles of palbociclib and ribociclib in Qatar.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted on HR+/HER-2-negative stage-IV breast cancer patients receiving palbociclib or ribociclib in the state of Qatar. Clinical data were collected from the National Center for Cancer Care and Research (NCCCR) in Qatar using Cerner. Primary outcomes were progression-free-survival (PFS) and overall-survival (OS) generated by Kaplan-Meier curves. Moreover, safety profiles of both two treatments were evaluated.

RESULTS

The data from 108 patients were included in the final analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in PFS between the palbociclib and ribociclib groups; PFS was 17.85 versus 13.55 months, respectively(p> 0.05). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in OS between the two medications, 29.82 versus 31.72 months, respectively(p>0.05). Adverse events were similar between the two groups. Neutropenia was the most common side effect in the study population accounting for 59.3% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Therefore, both treatments have similar efficacy and safety profiles. Further research on a larger-scale population and longer follow-up period is recommeneded.

摘要

引言

哌柏西利和瑞博西利适用于激素受体阳性、HER-2阴性(HR+/HER2-阴性)晚期乳腺癌的一线治疗。尽管随机对照试验(RCT)证明了它们的临床疗效,但尚无观察性研究来验证现实世界中的临床发现。因此,本研究旨在评估和比较卡塔尔使用哌柏西利和瑞博西利的临床有效性和安全性。

材料与方法

对卡塔尔接受哌柏西利或瑞博西利治疗的HR+/HER-2阴性IV期乳腺癌患者进行了一项回顾性观察研究。使用Cerner从卡塔尔国家癌症护理与研究中心(NCCCR)收集临床数据。主要结局是通过Kaplan-Meier曲线得出的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。此外,评估了两种治疗方法的安全性。

结果

108例患者的数据纳入最终分析。哌柏西利组和瑞博西利组的PFS无统计学显著差异;PFS分别为17.85个月和13.55个月(p>0.05)。同样,两种药物的OS也无统计学显著差异,分别为29.82个月和31.72个月(p>0.05)。两组的不良事件相似。中性粒细胞减少是研究人群中最常见的副作用,占患者的59.3%。

结论

因此,两种治疗方法具有相似的疗效和安全性。建议对更大规模人群进行进一步研究并延长随访期。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e7b/10757634/6a84824f41f3/fonc-13-1203684-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验