Bulling Lisanne J, Hilpert Peter, Bertschi Isabella C, Ivic Ana, Bodenmann Guy
Department of Psychology, Clinical Psychology for Children/Adolescents & Couples/Families, University of Zurich, Binzmühlestrasse 14/23, Zürich, CH - 8050 Switzerland.
Department of Psychology, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Int J Appl Posit Psychol. 2023;8(Suppl 2):187-204. doi: 10.1007/s41042-023-00087-5. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
It is well known that although relationship external stressors can harm couples, dyadic coping behavior can buffer the negative effects of stress. Thus far, however, less is known about how vocally encoded stress (i.e., ) might affect the stress-coping process in couples during an interaction. Therefore, the goal of the current study was to compare two different stress hypotheses (i.e., paraverbal communication stress hypothesis and emotional resonance hypothesis). We observed 187 mixed-gender couples ( = 374 participants) interacting naturally after an experimental stress induction (Trier Social Stress Test), for which couples were randomly allocated into three groups (women stressed, men stressed, and both stressed). Results of a multi-group actor-partner interdependence mediation model (APIMeM) show that either the paraverbal communication stress hypothesis or the emotional resonance hypothesis could be confirmed, depending on whether the man, the woman, or both partners were stressed.
众所周知,尽管关系外部压力源会对夫妻造成伤害,但二元应对行为可以缓冲压力的负面影响。然而,到目前为止,关于有声编码的压力(即 )在互动过程中如何影响夫妻的压力应对过程,人们了解得较少。因此,本研究的目的是比较两种不同的压力假设(即副语言沟通压力假设和情感共鸣假设)。我们观察了187对不同性别的夫妻(n = 374名参与者)在实验性压力诱导(特里尔社会压力测试)后自然互动的情况,夫妻被随机分为三组(女性压力组、男性压力组和双方压力组)。多组演员-伙伴相互依赖中介模型(APIMeM)的结果表明,根据是男性、女性还是双方伴侣受到压力,副语言沟通压力假设或情感共鸣假设都可以得到证实。