Suppr超能文献

以患者为中心还是以人群为中心?认知差异如何造成伤害和引发不信任。

Patient-centered or population-centered? How epistemic discrepancies cause harm and sow mistrust.

机构信息

Princeton University, 118 Julis Romo Rabinowitz, Princeton, NJ, 08540, USA.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2024 Jan;341:116552. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116552. Epub 2023 Dec 28.

Abstract

Medical distrust is often conceived of as a problem of misinformation or ignorance. In this paper, I depart from this framework, attributing distrust instead to epistemic divergence between lay people and experts. Using data from a contraceptive side effects Facebook group and in-depth physician interviews, I find that providers employ a "body-as-subject" lens informed by population-health goals, while group members employ a "body-as-agent" lens that privileges individuality and bodily autonomy. Provider epistemologies are privileged, creating epistemic injustice and harm for patients. Ultimately, this erodes trust in providers and the medical community more broadly.

摘要

医学不信任通常被认为是信息错误或无知的问题。在本文中,我背离了这一框架,将不信任归因于外行和专家之间的认识分歧。我使用来自避孕副作用 Facebook 群组和深入的医生访谈的数据发现,提供者采用了一种“以身体为主体”的视角,这种视角受到人口健康目标的影响,而小组成员则采用了一种“以身体为代理”的视角,这种视角更注重个性和身体自主权。提供者的认识论是有特权的,这为患者造成了认识不公正和伤害。最终,这会侵蚀患者对提供者和更广泛的医疗界的信任。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验