Suppr超能文献

使用无闪光和传统粘结托槽并采用不同 finishing 方案时牙釉质变色情况的比较。 (注:这里“finishing protocols”直译为“完成方案”,在正畸领域可能有更专业的术语含义,你可根据实际情况进一步调整表述)

Comparison of Enamel Discoloration using Flash-Free and Conventional Adhesive Brackets with Different Finishing Protocols.

作者信息

Kaya Abdullah, Bilgiç Zortuk Fundagül

机构信息

Oral and Dental Health Center, Hatay, Turkey.

Hatay Mustafa Kemal University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Hatay, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk J Orthod. 2023 Dec 29;36(4):248-253. doi: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2023.2022.154.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of flash-free and conventional adhesive brackets and different finishing techniques on enamel discoloration.

METHODS

Forty human premolar teeth were utilized and randomly divided into four groups based on the type of brackets and finishing technique: (1) Gemini brackets were used for orthodontic bonding. After debanding, adhesive remnants were cleaned using a 12-blade tungsten carbide bur. (2) Gemini suspenders were used for orthodontic bonding. After debanding the brackets, adhesive remnants were cleaned using12-blade APC™ Flash-Free brackets were used for orthodontic bonding. After debanding, adhesive remnants were cleaned a 12-blade tungsten carbide bur and polished with Sof-Lex disks. (4) APC™ Flash-Free brackets were used for orthodontic bonding. After debanding, the adhesive remnants were cleaned using a 12-blade tungsten carbide bur. A Vita Easyshade spectrophotometer was used to measure the color change values of the 40 teeth.

RESULTS

The color change of the enamel surface in the Flash Free bracket group was significantly less than that in the conventional groups (p=0.003 p˂0.05). The mean ΔE values obtained from the Sof-Lex groups were lower than those obtained from the groups without Sof-Lex, but these results were not statistically significant (p=0.280 p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

It is recommended to use Flash-Free brackets and polish with Sof-Lex disk following the clean-up procedures to minimize the possibility of discoloration of the teeth during orthodontic treatment.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较速干型和传统型粘结托槽以及不同的 finishing 技术对牙釉质变色的影响。

方法

使用40颗人类前磨牙,根据托槽类型和 finishing 技术随机分为四组:(1) 使用 Gemini 托槽进行正畸粘结。拆除托槽后,使用12刃碳化钨车针清理粘结剂残余物。(2) 使用 Gemini 悬吊式托槽进行正畸粘结。拆除托槽后,使用12刃 APC™ 速干型托槽进行正畸粘结。拆除托槽后,使用12刃碳化钨车针清理粘结剂残余物,并用 Sof-Lex 盘进行抛光。(4) 使用 APC™ 速干型托槽进行正畸粘结。拆除托槽后,使用12刃碳化钨车针清理粘结剂残余物。使用 Vita Easyshade 分光光度计测量这40颗牙齿的颜色变化值。

结果

速干型托槽组牙釉质表面的颜色变化明显小于传统组(p = 0.003,p˂0.05)。从 Sof-Lex 组获得的平均 ΔE 值低于未使用 Sof-Lex 的组,但这些结果无统计学意义(p = 0.280,p>0.05)。

结论

建议使用速干型托槽,并在清理程序后用 Sof-Lex 盘进行抛光,以尽量减少正畸治疗期间牙齿变色的可能性。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Enamel color changes following orthodontic treatment.正畸治疗后的牙釉质颜色变化。
Indian J Dent Res. 2017 May-Jun;28(3):330-336. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_404_15.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验