Suppr超能文献

一种新型无飞边粘结系统的剪切粘结强度与粘结时间的比较

Comparison of shear bond strength and bonding time of a novel flash-free bonding system.

作者信息

Lee Moonyoung, Kanavakis Georgios

机构信息

a  Program Director, Department of Dentistry, Division of Orthodontics, Saint Barnabas Hospital, Bronx, NY.

b  Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Mass.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2016 Mar;86(2):265-70. doi: 10.2319/011715-37.1. Epub 2015 Sep 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the bonding time, shear bond strength (SBS), and adhesive residue index (ARI) of APC(TM) Flash-Free bonding system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-six extracted human maxillary premolars were randomly divided into three groups (12 per group) and used for this in vitro study: group 1, APC Flash-Free Adhesive Coated Appliance System; group 2, Clarity ADVANCED Ceramic Bracket pasted manually; group 3 (control group), 3M APC PLUS Adhesive prepasted brackets bonded with the extruded flash removed. Bonding time was measured using a stopwatch. Bond strength was measured using an Instron at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min. The ARI was graded on a scale from 1 to 5. Repeated-measures analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey tests were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

It took significantly (P < .001) less time to bond in the APC Flash-Free Adhesive group (30.7 ± 3.3 seconds) compared with the control group (41.8 ± 4.0 seconds) and the manual group (39.2 ± 2.8 seconds). The APC Flash-Free Adhesive coated bracket had significantly (P < .001) greater SBS (13.7 ± 2.2 MPa) compared with the control group (10.8 ± 2.0 MPa) and the manual group (10.4 ± 1.4 MPa). The ARI was significantly (P < .001) greater with the APC Flash-Free Adhesive coated bracket compared with that of the other two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with other methods of bonding, the APC Flash-Free Adhesive Coated System can potentially reduce bonding time while increasing SBS.

摘要

目的

评估APC(TM)免冲洗粘结系统的粘结时间、剪切粘结强度(SBS)和粘结剂残留指数(ARI)。

材料与方法

三十六颗拔除的人类上颌前磨牙随机分为三组(每组12颗),用于本体外研究:第1组,APC免冲洗粘结剂涂层矫治器系统;第2组,手动粘贴的Clarity ADVANCED陶瓷托槽;第3组(对照组),去除挤出飞边后粘结的3M APC PLUS预粘贴托槽。使用秒表测量粘结时间。使用Instron以1mm/min的十字头速度测量粘结强度。ARI按1至5级评分。采用重复测量方差分析和事后Tukey检验进行统计分析。

结果

与对照组(41.8±4.0秒)和手动组(39.2±2.8秒)相比,APC免冲洗粘结剂组的粘结时间显著缩短(P<.001)(30.7±3.3秒)。与对照组(10.8±2.0MPa)和手动组(10.4±1.4MPa)相比,APC免冲洗粘结剂涂层托槽的SBS显著更高(P<.001)(13.7±2.2MPa)。与其他两组相比,APC免冲洗粘结剂涂层托槽的ARI显著更高(P<.001)。

结论

与其他粘结方法相比,APC免冲洗粘结剂涂层系统可能会减少粘结时间,同时提高SBS。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of shear bond strength of plastic and ceramic brackets.塑料与陶瓷托槽剪切粘结强度的比较。
J Orofac Orthop. 2014 Sep;75(5):345-57. doi: 10.1007/s00056-014-0236-6. Epub 2014 Aug 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验