Titiz Yurdakal Serap, Oral Ekrem, Gelgör İbrahim Erhan
Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, İzmir, Turkey.
Private Practice, Mersin, Turkey.
Turk J Orthod. 2023 Dec 29;36(4):254-260. doi: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2023.2022.98.
Presurgical nasoalveolar molding (PNAM) using a modified nostril retainer is a new treatment approach. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of early nasal molding using this approach with an average follow-up of 2 years in patients with severe unilateral cleft lip and palate.
This retrospective study included 18 patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate without genetic syndromes who underwent PNAM with modified nostril retainers. The Grayson technique was employed with an intraoral plate to approximate cleft segments. Nasal molding was initiated before reducing the cleft width to 5 mm. Measurements, including alar base height ratio (ABHR), nasal floor width ratio (NFWR), columellar length ratio (CLR), columellar angle (CA), and nostril axis inclination on the cleft and non-cleft sides (NAI-C and NAI-NC, respectively), were calculated from standard photographs taken before PNAM (T1), after PNAM (T2), after an average of 1.81 months post-surgery (T3), and after an average of 2.2 years after T3 (T4). Pairwise comparisons of values at the four time points were conducted.
NFWR, CLR, CA, NAI-C and NAI-NC significantly increased after PNAM (p<0.05). However, no significant change was observed in ABHR (p>0.05) from T1 to T2. These outcomes were maintained at T4, and no patient developed a mega nostril.
The use of a modified nostril retainer for nasal molding appears to provide stability during the high probability of relapse reported in the literature.
使用改良鼻孔保持器进行术前鼻牙槽塑形(PNAM)是一种新的治疗方法。本研究旨在评估采用该方法对重度单侧唇腭裂患者进行早期鼻塑形的效果,平均随访2年。
这项回顾性研究纳入了18例无遗传综合征的单侧唇腭裂患者,他们接受了使用改良鼻孔保持器的PNAM治疗。采用格雷森技术并使用口内板来使腭裂段靠拢。在将腭裂宽度缩小至5毫米之前开始鼻塑形。从PNAM前(T1)、PNAM后(T2)、术后平均1.81个月(T3)以及T3后平均2.2年(T4)拍摄的标准照片中计算各项测量值,包括鼻翼基底高度比(ABHR)、鼻底宽度比(NFWR)、鼻小柱长度比(CLR)、鼻小柱角度(CA)以及腭裂侧和非腭裂侧的鼻孔轴倾斜度(分别为NAI-C和NAI-NC)。对四个时间点的值进行两两比较。
PNAM后NFWR、CLR、CA、NAI-C和NAI-NC显著增加(p<0.05)。然而,从T1到T2,ABHR未观察到显著变化(p>0.05)。这些结果在T4时得以维持,且没有患者出现鼻孔过大的情况。
使用改良鼻孔保持器进行鼻塑形似乎在文献报道的高复发概率期间提供了稳定性。