Department of Infectious Disease, Beijing Ditan Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100015, China.
WHO Collaborating Centre for Comprehensive Management of HIV Treatment and Care, Beijing Ditan Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100015, China.
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Jan 2;24(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08906-5.
Low-level viremia (LLV) has been identified as a potential precursor to virologic failure (VF), yet its clinical implications, particularly within the context of Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors (INSTIs)-based regimens, remain insufficiently explored. The study aimed to investigate the relationship between LLV and VF within ART-naïve patients on INSTIs-based regimens in China.
A longitudinal cohort study was conducted with ART-naïve patients aged ≥ 18 years at Beijing Ditan Hospital, under the Chinese National Free Antiretroviral Treatment Program (NFATP). The LLV was defined as a viral load (VL) ranging from 50 to 199 copies/mL after six months of ART initiation, and VF as a VL ≥ 200 copies/mL. Sensitive analyses were also performed, defining LLV as 50-999 copies/mL and VF as exceeding 1000 copies/mL. Multivariate logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier (KM) curve, and Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) models were used to evaluate the risk factors associated with LLV and VF events.
The study involved 830 ART-naïve patients, comprising 600 in the INSTIs group and 230 in the protease inhibitors (PIs) group. LLV events were observed in 10.4% of patients on PIs-based regimens and and 3.2% on INSTIs-based regimens (P < 0.001). INSTIs-based regimens demonstrated a protective effect against LLV events (aHR = 0.27, 95% CI 0.137-0.532). VF events occurred in 10.9% of patients on PIs-based regimens and 2.0% on INSTIs-based regimens, respectively (P < 0.001). The occurrence of LLV events significantly increased the risk of VF by 123.5% (95% CI 7.5%-364.4%), while the integrase inhibitors were associated with a 76.9% (95% CI 59.1%-86.9%) reduction in VF risk.
Our findings indicate that INSTIs-based regimens are critical protective factors against LLV and subsequent VF. These results underscore the importance of HIV viral load monitoring to ensuring effective treatment outcomes, highlighting the necessity for prompt and precise monitoring to refine HIV treatment methodologies.
低水平病毒血症(LLV)已被确定为病毒学失败(VF)的潜在前兆,但在整合酶抑制剂(INSTIs)为基础的方案中,其临床意义,特别是在其中,仍未得到充分探索。本研究旨在探讨中国接受 INSTIs 为基础的方案的初治患者中 LLV 与 VF 之间的关系。
采用纵向队列研究,研究对象为在北京地坛医院接受中国国家免费抗逆转录病毒治疗方案(NFATP)治疗的年龄≥18 岁的初治患者。LLV 定义为 ART 治疗 6 个月后病毒载量(VL)为 50-199 拷贝/ml,VF 定义为 VL≥200 拷贝/ml。还进行了敏感分析,将 LLV 定义为 50-999 拷贝/ml,VF 定义为超过 1000 拷贝/ml。采用多变量逻辑回归、Kaplan-Meier(KM)曲线和广义估计方程(GEE)模型评估与 LLV 和 VF 事件相关的风险因素。
本研究共纳入 830 例初治患者,其中 600 例接受 INSTIs 方案治疗,230 例接受蛋白酶抑制剂(PI)方案治疗。PI 方案组发生 LLV 事件的患者占 10.4%,INSTIs 方案组为 3.2%(P<0.001)。INSTIs 方案对 LLV 事件有保护作用(aHR=0.27,95%CI 0.137-0.532)。PI 方案组发生 VF 事件的患者占 10.9%,INSTIs 方案组为 2.0%(P<0.001)。LLV 事件的发生使 VF 的风险增加了 123.5%(95%CI 7.5%-364.4%),而整合酶抑制剂使 VF 的风险降低了 76.9%(95%CI 59.1%-86.9%)。
本研究结果表明,INSTIs 为基础的方案是预防 LLV 和随后发生 VF 的关键保护因素。这些结果强调了 HIV 病毒载量监测对确保有效治疗结果的重要性,突出了需要及时、准确的监测来完善 HIV 治疗方法。