College of Physical Education, Chengdu University, Sichuan, China.
College of Physical Education, Huanggang Normal University, Hubei, China.
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2024 Jan 2;19(3):232-241. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2023-0246. Print 2024 Mar 1.
This study compared the effects of individualizing supramaximal interval rowing interventions using anaerobic power reserve (APR [high-intensity interval training (HIIT) prescribed according to individual APR (HIITAPR)]) and power associated with maximal oxygen uptake (WV˙O2max [HIIT prescribed based on the individual WV˙O2max (HIITW)]) on the homogeneity of physiological and performance adaptations.
Twenty-four well-trained rowers (age 24.8 [4.3] y, stature 182.5 [3] cm, body mass 86.1 [4.3]) were randomized into interventions consisting of 4 × 30-second intervals at 130%APR (WV˙O2max + 0.3 × maximal sprint power) with weekly progression by increasing the number of repetitions per set (5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, from first to sixth session) and the same sets and repetitions with the intensity described as 130% WV˙O2max. The work-to-recovery ratio was 1:1 for repetitions and 3 minutes between sets. Responses of aerobic fitness indices, power output, cardiac hemodynamics, locomotor abilities, and time-trial performance were examined.
Both HIITAPR and HIITW interventions significantly improved V˙O2max, lactate threshold, cardiac hemodynamics, and 2000-m performance, with no between-groups difference in changes over time. However, HIITAPR resulted in a lower interindividual variability in adaptations in V˙O2max and related physiological parameters, but this is not the case for athletic performance, which can depend on a multitude of factors beyond physiological parameters.
Results demonstrated that expressing supramaximal interval intensity as a proportion of APR facilitates imposing the same degrees of homeostatic stress and leads to more homogeneous physiological adaptations in maximal variables when compared to prescribing a supramaximal HIIT intervention using WV˙O2max. However, lower interindividual variability would be seen in submaximal variables if HIIT interventions were prescribed using WV˙O2max.
本研究比较了根据无氧能力储备(APR[高强度间歇训练(HIIT)根据个体 APR 进行规定])和与最大摄氧量相关的功率(WV˙O2max[HIIT 根据个体 WV˙O2max 进行规定(HIITW)])个性化制定超最大间歇划船干预对生理和性能适应的同质性的影响。
24 名训练有素的划船运动员(年龄 24.8[4.3]岁,身高 182.5[3]厘米,体重 86.1[4.3]公斤)被随机分为两组干预措施,包括 4×30 秒间隔,强度为 130%APR(WV˙O2max+0.3×最大冲刺功率),每周通过增加每组重复次数(从第一次到第六次会话,分别为 5、6、7、8、9 和 10)和相同的重复次数来提高强度,强度描述为 130%WV˙O2max。重复的工作与恢复比例为 1:1,每组之间的休息时间为 3 分钟。检查有氧健身指数、功率输出、心脏血液动力学、运动能力和计时赛表现的反应。
HIITAPR 和 HIITW 干预均显著提高了 V˙O2max、乳酸阈、心脏血液动力学和 2000 米成绩,且随着时间的推移,两组之间的变化无差异。然而,HIITAPR 导致 V˙O2max 和相关生理参数的适应在个体间的变异性较低,但运动表现并非如此,运动表现可能取决于除生理参数以外的多种因素。
结果表明,将超最大间歇强度表示为 APR 的比例可以更方便地施加相同程度的体内平衡压力,并在与使用 WV˙O2max 规定超最大 HIIT 干预相比,导致最大变量的生理适应更加均匀。然而,如果使用 WV˙O2max 规定 HIIT 干预,则亚最大变量的个体间变异性较低。