• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响类风湿关节炎患者使用 Janus 激酶抑制剂有效性和安全性的相关因素:一项真实世界研究。

Patient-related factors influencing the effectiveness and safety of Janus Kinase inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: a real-world study.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.

Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 2;14(1):172. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50379-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-50379-8
PMID:38168532
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10761698/
Abstract

In real-world scenarios, Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors are often offered to "difficult-to-treat" rheumatoid arthritis patients, quite different from those included in randomized controlled trials. Our study aimed to evaluate the influence of patient-related factors on the effectiveness and safety of JAK inhibitors in real-world clinical practice. This observational retrospective study involved rheumatoid arthritis patients who received treatment with either tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, or filgotinib. At 12 months of treatment, reasons for and rates of JAK inhibitor treatment discontinuation were examined. Treatment retentions were analyzed through Cox proportional hazard regression models and Kaplan-Meier estimates. Patient-related factors that could influence treatment retention were evaluated for the discontinuation reasons of lack of effectiveness and adverse events. At 12 months of treatment, discontinuation rates for 189 JAK inhibitor treatments were: lack of effectiveness (24.3%), adverse events (20.6%), and other reasons (3.7%). The remaining 51.4% represents the treatment continuation rate. No patient-related factors evaluated had an influence on treatment discontinuation due to lack of effectiveness. Ae significantly increased the risk of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (p = 0.030). In terms of age, at 12 month of treatment, discontinuation rates due to adverse events were: < 65 years, 14.4% vs. 65 years or older, 26.3% (p = 0.019). Rheumatoid arthritis patients aged 65 years or older showed an increased risk of JAK inhibitor treatment discontinuation due to adverse events. Factors not related to treatment discontinuation were: sex, rheumatoid arthritis disease duration, rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, seropositivity for rheumatoid factor, seropositivity for anti-cyclic citrullinated peptides, number of prior biologic treatments, number of prior JAK inhibitor treatments, concomitant use of glucocorticoids, and concomitant use of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

摘要

在实际情况下,Janus 激酶 (JAK) 抑制剂通常提供给“难治性”类风湿关节炎患者,与随机对照试验中纳入的患者不同。我们的研究旨在评估患者相关因素对真实世界临床实践中 JAK 抑制剂疗效和安全性的影响。这项观察性回顾性研究涉及接受托法替尼、巴瑞替尼、乌帕替尼或菲卓替尼治疗的类风湿关节炎患者。在治疗 12 个月时,检查了 JAK 抑制剂治疗中断的原因和停药率。通过 Cox 比例风险回归模型和 Kaplan-Meier 估计分析治疗保留率。评估了与缺乏疗效和不良事件相关的停药原因的患者相关因素,以评估其对治疗保留的影响。在治疗 12 个月时,189 例 JAK 抑制剂治疗的停药率为:缺乏疗效(24.3%)、不良事件(20.6%)和其他原因(3.7%)。其余 51.4%代表治疗持续率。评估的患者相关因素对因缺乏疗效而停药没有影响。AE 显著增加了因不良事件而停药的风险(p=0.030)。在年龄方面,在治疗 12 个月时,因不良事件而停药的比例为:<65 岁,14.4%;65 岁或以上,26.3%(p=0.019)。65 岁或以上的类风湿关节炎患者因不良事件而终止 JAK 抑制剂治疗的风险增加。与治疗无关的因素包括:性别、类风湿关节炎疾病持续时间、类风湿关节炎疾病活动度、类风湿因子阳性、抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体阳性、先前生物治疗次数、先前 JAK 抑制剂治疗次数、同时使用糖皮质激素和同时使用传统合成疾病修饰抗风湿药物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f5/10761698/36f3299dc394/41598_2023_50379_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f5/10761698/36f3299dc394/41598_2023_50379_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f5/10761698/36f3299dc394/41598_2023_50379_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient-related factors influencing the effectiveness and safety of Janus Kinase inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: a real-world study.影响类风湿关节炎患者使用 Janus 激酶抑制剂有效性和安全性的相关因素:一项真实世界研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 2;14(1):172. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50379-8.
2
Real-world study comparing the efficacy of Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis.真实世界研究比较了 Janus 激酶抑制剂在治疗困难的类风湿关节炎患者中的疗效。
Clin Rheumatol. 2024 Nov;43(11):3285-3292. doi: 10.1007/s10067-024-07117-w. Epub 2024 Sep 7.
3
Persistence of Janus-kinase (JAK) inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: Australia wide study.Janus 激酶(JAK)抑制剂在类风湿关节炎中的持久性:澳大利亚全国性研究。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2024 Feb;64:152314. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2023.152314. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
4
ToRaRI (Tofacitinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis a Real-Life experience in Italy): Effectiveness, safety profile of tofacitinib and concordance between patient-reported outcomes and physician's global assessment of disease activity in a retrospective study in Central-Italy.托法替布治疗类风湿关节炎的真实世界研究(意大利经验):在意大利中部的一项回顾性研究中,评估托法替布的疗效、安全性概况以及患者报告结局与医生评估疾病活动度之间的一致性。
Clin Rheumatol. 2024 Feb;43(2):657-665. doi: 10.1007/s10067-023-06836-w. Epub 2023 Dec 23.
5
Real-world comparative study of drug retention of Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.真实世界中类风湿关节炎患者使用 Janus 激酶抑制剂的药物保留率的对比研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 11;19(7):e0306714. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306714. eCollection 2024.
6
Comparative effectiveness and safety of non-tumour necrosis factor biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis showing insufficient response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.在对肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂反应不足的活动性类风湿关节炎患者中,非肿瘤坏死因子生物制剂和 Janus 激酶抑制剂的比较有效性和安全性:一项随机对照试验的贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2021 Aug;46(4):984-992. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13380. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
7
Are all JAK inhibitors for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis equivalent? An adjusted indirect comparison of the efficacy of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib.所有的 JAK 抑制剂在治疗类风湿关节炎方面都等效吗?托法替布、巴瑞替尼、乌帕替尼和费乐替尼疗效的调整间接比较。
Clin Rheumatol. 2023 Dec;42(12):3225-3235. doi: 10.1007/s10067-023-06787-2. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
8
Evaluation of discontinuation for adverse events of JAK inhibitors and bDMARDs in an international collaboration of rheumatoid arthritis registers (the 'JAK-pot' study).在类风湿性关节炎登记的国际合作中对JAK抑制剂和生物改善病情抗风湿药不良事件停药情况的评估(“JAK-pot”研究)
Ann Rheum Dis. 2024 Mar 12;83(4):421-428. doi: 10.1136/ard-2023-224670.
9
Adverse reactions to Janus kinase inhibitors: Study of their incidence and predictive factors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Janus 激酶抑制剂的不良反应:类风湿关节炎患者的发生率及预测因素研究。
Med Clin (Barc). 2024 Oct 25;163(8):391-396. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2024.05.007. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
10
Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis refractory to biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (SELECT-BEYOND): a double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trial.乌帕替尼治疗生物制剂难治的活动性类风湿关节炎患者的安全性和疗效(SELECT-BEYOND):一项双盲、随机对照 3 期临床试验。
Lancet. 2018 Jun 23;391(10139):2513-2524. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31116-4. Epub 2018 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiovascular Risk in Rheumatic Patients Treated with JAK Inhibitors: The Role of Traditional and Emerging Biomarkers in a Pilot Study.接受JAK抑制剂治疗的风湿性疾病患者的心血管风险:一项试点研究中传统和新兴生物标志物的作用
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 1;14(15):5433. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155433.
2
Interindividual variability and its impact on the effectiveness of Janus kinase inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis treatment.个体间变异性及其对类风湿关节炎治疗中Janus激酶抑制剂疗效的影响。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Mar 28;12:1512501. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1512501. eCollection 2025.
3
Achievement of treatment targets and maintenance of response with upadacitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis in real-world practice: 1-year outcomes from the UPHOLD observational study.

本文引用的文献

1
Identification of two tofacitinib subpopulations with different relative risk versus TNF inhibitors: an analysis of the open label, randomised controlled study ORAL Surveillance.鉴定两种托法替布亚群与 TNF 抑制剂的相对风险不同:一项开放性标签、随机对照研究 ORAL Surveillance 的分析。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 Jul;82(7):901-910. doi: 10.1136/ard-2022-223715. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
2
Upadacitinib for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Comprehensive Review.乌帕替尼治疗类风湿关节炎患者:一项全面综述。
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 21;12(5):1734. doi: 10.3390/jcm12051734.
3
EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2022 update.
乌帕替尼在中度至重度类风湿性关节炎患者的真实临床实践中实现治疗目标并维持疗效:UPHOLD观察性研究的1年结果
Arthritis Res Ther. 2025 Apr 10;27(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13075-025-03528-5.
4
Unveiling the mechanism of amelioration of adjuvant-induced rheumatoid arthritis by Drynaria quercifolia rhizome extract using network pharmacology and gene expression-based studies.利用网络药理学和基于基因表达的研究揭示槲蕨根茎提取物改善佐剂诱导的类风湿性关节炎的机制
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 8;15(1):11981. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87461-2.
5
Real-World Evidence for Baricitinib in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Spain: A Systematic Literature Review.巴瑞替尼治疗西班牙类风湿关节炎的真实世界证据:一项系统文献综述
Adv Ther. 2025 May;42(5):2403-2428. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03161-3. Epub 2025 Mar 22.
6
Rheumatoid Factor: Diagnostic and Prognostic Performance and Therapeutic Implications in Rheumatoid Arthritis.类风湿因子:类风湿关节炎的诊断、预后评估及治疗意义
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 25;14(5):1529. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051529.
7
Real-world effectiveness and retention rate of upadacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a multicentre study.乌帕替尼在类风湿关节炎患者中的真实世界疗效和保留率:一项多中心研究的结果
Clin Exp Med. 2025 Feb 5;25(1):50. doi: 10.1007/s10238-025-01578-2.
8
Therapeutic Maintenance of Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Real Life for Rheumatoid Arthritis: Retrospective Study.类风湿关节炎患者在现实生活中使用 Janus 激酶抑制剂的治疗维持:一项回顾性研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 7;13(16):4608. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164608.
9
Efficacy and Safety of Filgotinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Aged over and under 65 Years (ENANTIA-65).非戈替尼在65岁及以上和65岁以下类风湿关节炎患者中的疗效和安全性(ENANTIA - 65)。
J Pers Med. 2024 Jul 2;14(7):712. doi: 10.3390/jpm14070712.
10
Biologics or Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Who are Insufficient Responders to Conventional Anti-Rheumatic Drugs.生物制剂或 Janus 激酶抑制剂在常规抗风湿药物反应不足的类风湿关节炎患者中的应用。
Drugs. 2024 Aug;84(8):877-894. doi: 10.1007/s40265-024-02059-8. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
EULAR 推荐的类风湿关节炎治疗方案:使用合成和生物疾病修正抗风湿药物:2022 更新版。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 Jan;82(1):3-18. doi: 10.1136/ard-2022-223356. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
4
After JAK inhibitor failure: to cycle or to switch, that is the question - data from the JAK-pot collaboration of registries.JAK 抑制剂治疗失败后:是继续用药还是换药,这是个问题——来自 JAK 抑制剂合作登记研究的数据。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 Feb;82(2):175-181. doi: 10.1136/ard-2022-222835. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
5
Factors affecting drug retention of Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the ANSWER cohort study.影响类风湿关节炎患者使用 Janus 激酶抑制剂药物留存率的因素:ANSWER 队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 7;12(1):134. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04075-0.
6
2021 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis.2021 年美国风湿病学会类风湿关节炎治疗指南。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021 Jul;73(7):924-939. doi: 10.1002/acr.24596. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
7
Efficacy and safety of switching Jak inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: an observational study.类风湿关节炎中切换 Jak 抑制剂的疗效和安全性:一项观察性研究。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2021 May-Jun;39(3):453-455. doi: 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/cbanza. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
8
Filgotinib versus placebo or adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate: a phase III randomised clinical trial.非戈替尼对比安慰剂或阿达木单抗治疗对甲氨蝶呤应答不足的类风湿关节炎患者:一项 III 期随机临床试验。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Jul;80(7):848-858. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219214. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
9
Filgotinib in combination with methotrexate or as monotherapy versus methotrexate monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and limited or no prior exposure to methotrexate: the phase 3, randomised controlled FINCH 3 trial.在有活性类风湿关节炎且之前有限制或未使用过甲氨蝶呤治疗的患者中,与甲氨蝶呤联合或作为单药治疗相比,Filgotinib 联合甲氨蝶呤或作为单药治疗:III 期随机对照 FINCH 3 试验。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Jun;80(6):727-738. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219213. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
10
Trial of Upadacitinib or Abatacept in Rheumatoid Arthritis.乌帕替尼或阿巴西普治疗类风湿关节炎的试验。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 15;383(16):1511-1521. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2008250.