• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

YouTube 是否在传播关于隆胸病的担忧?

Is YouTube Propagating Concerns About Breast Implant Illness?

机构信息

From the Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 2024 Feb 1;92(2):144-147. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003743. Epub 2023 Oct 17.

DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000003743
PMID:38170971
Abstract

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of patients who underwent breast implant surgery are reporting a cluster of concerning physical and psychological symptoms-newly coined term breast implant illness (BII). YouTube is a popular educational tool for plastic surgery patients.

OBJECTIVES

The purposes of this study were to assess the quality and reliability of YouTube videos on BII, compare the quality and reliability of different video categories and publishers, and determine the frequencies of reported BII symptoms.

METHODS

On YouTube, videos were searched for the term breast implant illness , and the first 100 results were collected. Engagement parameters and symptoms of BII mentioned in each video were recorded. Video power index, a modified DISCERN instrument, and the Global Quality Scale (GQS) were used to assess popularity, reliability, and quality, respectively.

RESULTS

Ninety videos met the inclusion criteria. More than half mentioned fatigue (66%), cognitive dysfunction (59%), or muscle and/or joint pain (57%). Videos with a plastic surgeon present had higher DISCERN ( P = 0.001) and GQS ( P = 0.002) scores than those without. Educational videos had higher DISCERN and GQS scores than patient experience ( P < 0.0001, P = 0.001) and entertainment and advertisement videos ( P = 0.014, P = 0.022). Videos published by plastic surgeons had higher Video power index ( P = 0.033), DISCERN ( P < 0.0001), and GQS scores ( P < 0.0001) than those by nonmedical publishers.

CONCLUSIONS

The top YouTube videos for BII are generally of low reliability and low-to-moderate quality. Patients unaware of YouTube's limited quality control measures for health education videos are susceptible to misinformation. Additional social media content created by plastic surgeons can improve the quality and accuracy of videos viewed by patients.

摘要

背景

越来越多接受过乳房植入手术的患者报告了一系列令人担忧的身体和心理症状——新 coined 术语乳房植入病(BII)。YouTube 是整形外科患者的热门教育工具。

目的

本研究旨在评估有关 BII 的 YouTube 视频的质量和可靠性,比较不同视频类别和发布者的质量和可靠性,并确定报告的 BII 症状的频率。

方法

在 YouTube 上搜索术语“乳房植入病”,收集前 100 个结果。记录每个视频中提到的 BII 症状的参与参数和症状。使用视频功率指数、改良的 DISCERN 仪器和全球质量量表(GQS)分别评估受欢迎程度、可靠性和质量。

结果

90 个视频符合纳入标准。超过一半的视频提到疲劳(66%)、认知功能障碍(59%)或肌肉和/或关节疼痛(57%)。有整形外科医生参与的视频的 DISCERN(P=0.001)和 GQS(P=0.002)评分高于没有医生参与的视频。教育视频的 DISCERN 和 GQS 评分高于患者体验(P<0.0001,P=0.001)和娱乐和广告视频(P=0.014,P=0.022)。整形外科医生发布的视频的视频功率指数(P=0.033)、DISCERN(P<0.0001)和 GQS 评分(P<0.0001)均高于非医学出版商发布的视频。

结论

BII 的顶级 YouTube 视频普遍可靠性低,质量低至中等。对 YouTube 健康教育培训视频质量控制措施有限不知情的患者容易受到误导。整形外科医生创建的其他社交媒体内容可以提高患者观看的视频的质量和准确性。

相似文献

1
Is YouTube Propagating Concerns About Breast Implant Illness?YouTube 是否在传播关于隆胸病的担忧?
Ann Plast Surg. 2024 Feb 1;92(2):144-147. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003743. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
2
Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for neck pain: A YouTube-based quality-control study.基于 YouTube 的视频质量控制研究:在线视频资源在颈椎病患者教育中的质量。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 21;10:972348. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.972348. eCollection 2022.
3
Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of the Information in Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos Shared on Open Access Video Sharing Platform YouTube.开放获取视频分享平台YouTube上袖状胃切除术视频中信息的可靠性、实用性及质量评估
Obes Surg. 2019 May;29(5):1477-1484. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03738-2.
4
Analysis of the quality, reliability, and popularity of information on strabismus on YouTube.分析 YouTube 上斜视相关信息的质量、可靠性和普及度。
Strabismus. 2020 Dec;28(4):175-180. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2020.1836002. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
5
The efficacy and reliability of English YouTube videos as a source of information for pregnant rheumatoid arthritis patients.英文 YouTube 视频作为类风湿关节炎孕妇信息来源的疗效和可靠性。
Clin Rheumatol. 2023 Dec;42(12):3311-3320. doi: 10.1007/s10067-023-06780-9. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
6
Evaluation of YouTube videos as a patient information source on intravitreal injection procedures.评估 YouTube 视频作为玻璃体腔内注射手术患者信息来源的价值。
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2022 Sep;45(7):748-755. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2022.02.023. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
7
YouTube as a Source of Information for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Stroke: A Quality, Reliability and Accuracy Analysis.YouTube 作为脑卒中患者经颅磁刺激的信息来源:一项质量、可靠性和准确性分析。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Dec;29(12):105309. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105309. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
8
Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of Intragastric Balloon Videos on YouTube.YouTube上胃内球囊视频的质量与可靠性评估
Obes Surg. 2022 Apr;32(4):1157-1163. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-05911-6. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
9
Assessing the scientific quality and reliability of YouTube videos about chemotherapy.评估 YouTube 视频中关于化疗的科学性和可靠性。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Nov 10;102(45):e35916. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035916.
10
Analysis of videos about vesicoureteral reflux on YouTube.YouTube上关于膀胱输尿管反流的视频分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Dec;17(6):858.e1-858.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Oct 15.

引用本文的文献

1
From Hashtags to Health Narratives: A Content Analysis of Breast Implant Illness on TikTok.从标签到健康叙事:TikTok上隆胸疾病的内容分析
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Jul 23. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-05074-6.
2
Breast implant illness after reconstruction with silicone breast implants.硅胶乳房植入物重建术后的乳房植入物疾病
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2025 Aug 1;117(8):1717-1728. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaf136.
3
Beyond the Posts: Analyzing Breast Implant Illness Discourse With Natural Language Processing and Deep Learning.超越帖子:使用自然语言处理和深度学习分析隆胸疾病话语
Aesthet Surg J. 2025 Jun 16;45(7):745-752. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjaf047.