Jia Chongyu, Zhang Renjie, Wang Jiaqi, Zhang Bo, Zhang Huaqing, Kang Liang, Zhou Luping, Shen Cailiang
Department of Orthopedics and Spine Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Laboratory of Spinal and Spinal Cord Injury Regeneration and Repair, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Neurospine. 2023 Dec;20(4):1407-1420. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346760.380. Epub 2023 Dec 31.
This study assessed biomechanical properties of pedicle screws enhanced or revised with 3 materials. We aimed to compare the efficacy of these materials in pedicle augmentation and revision.
One hundred twenty human cadaveric vertebrae were utilized for in vitro testing. Vertebrae bone density was evaluated. Allograft bone particles (ABP), calcium phosphate cement (CPC), and demineralized bone matrix (DBM) were used to augment or revise pedicle screw. Post the implantation of pedicle screws, parameters such as insertional torque, pullout strength, cycles to failure and failure load were measured using specialized instruments.
ABP, CPC, and DBM significantly enhanced biomechanical properties of the screws. CPC augmentation showed superior properties compared to ABP or DBM. ABP-augmented screws had higher cycles to failure and failure loads than DBM-augmented screws, with no difference in pullout strength. CPC-revised screws exhibited similar strength to the original screws, while ABP-revised screws showed comparable cycles to failure and failure loads but lower pullout strength. DBM-revised screws did not match the original screws' strength.
ABP, CPC, and DBM effectively improve pedicle screw stability for pedicle augmentation. CPC demonstrated the highest efficacy, followed by ABP, while DBM was less effective. For pedicle revision, CPC is recommended as the primary choice, with ABP as an alternative. However, using DBM for pedicle revision is not recommended.
本研究评估了用3种材料增强或翻修的椎弓根螺钉的生物力学性能。我们旨在比较这些材料在椎弓根强化和翻修中的效果。
使用120具人类尸体椎骨进行体外测试。评估椎骨骨密度。使用同种异体骨颗粒(ABP)、磷酸钙骨水泥(CPC)和脱矿骨基质(DBM)来增强或翻修椎弓根螺钉。在植入椎弓根螺钉后,使用专门仪器测量诸如插入扭矩、拔出强度、失效循环次数和失效载荷等参数。
ABP、CPC和DBM显著增强了螺钉的生物力学性能。与ABP或DBM相比,CPC增强显示出更优越的性能。ABP增强的螺钉比DBM增强的螺钉具有更高的失效循环次数和失效载荷,拔出强度无差异。CPC翻修的螺钉表现出与原始螺钉相似的强度,而ABP翻修的螺钉在失效循环次数和失效载荷方面相当,但拔出强度较低。DBM翻修的螺钉与原始螺钉的强度不匹配。
ABP、CPC和DBM可有效提高用于椎弓根强化的椎弓根螺钉稳定性。CPC显示出最高的疗效,其次是ABP,而DBM效果较差。对于椎弓根翻修,建议首选CPC,ABP可作为替代。然而,不建议使用DBM进行椎弓根翻修。