Steegers E A, Theunissen R P, Nijdam W S, Eskes T K, Jongsma H W, Symonds E M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1986 Nov;23(3-4):225-31. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(86)90151-6.
The obstetrical policy during labor at two University clinics in Nottingham (United Kingdom) and Nijmegen (The Netherlands) was investigated prospectively and simultaneously during a period of three months (1984). At the University of Nijmegen the obstetrical population tended to be more 'pathologic', and less intervention during labor was observed for early amniotomy, pain relief, induction and augmentation of labor. The pH in umbilical arterial blood was as a mean 0.01 unit lower in Nijmegen than in Nottingham. The validity of electronic fetal monitoring appeared to be higher in Nijmegen. It is concluded that data on the neonate probably cannot give an answer in favor of one of these policies. Parenthood information could give more conclusive evidence.
1984年,在三个月的时间里,对英国诺丁汉和荷兰奈梅亨的两家大学诊所分娩期间的产科政策进行了前瞻性同步调查。在奈梅亨大学,产科人群往往更“病态”,在早期羊膜穿刺术、缓解疼痛、引产和加强宫缩方面,分娩期间的干预较少。奈梅亨的脐动脉血pH值平均比诺丁汉低0.01个单位。电子胎儿监护在奈梅亨的有效性似乎更高。结论是,关于新生儿的数据可能无法得出支持其中一项政策的答案。父母信息可能会提供更确凿的证据。