Li Xuezheng, Lu Lijun, Fu Xuefeng, Li Hao, Yang Wen, Guo Hua, Guo Kaifeng, Huang Zhen
Postgraduate Cultivation Base of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Panyu Central Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangzhou Panyu Central Hospital, Guangzhou Guangdong, China.
Front Neurol. 2023 Dec 6;14:1270624. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1270624. eCollection 2023.
INTRODUCTION: Optimal treatment strategies for post-stroke dysphagia (PSD) remain to be explored. Electroacupuncture (EA) has attracted widespread attention due to its simplicity, cheapness, and safety. However, the efficacy of EA in the treatment of PSD lacks high-level evidence-based medical support. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the clinical value of EA in the treatment of PSD. METHODS: A total of seven databases were searched for relevant literature. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on EA alone or EA combined with other interventions for the treatment of PSD were assessed using the modified Jadad scale. The studies with a score of ≥4 were included. The quality of the included studies was then assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. The meta-analysis was performed using Rev. Man 5.3 software. RESULTS: Twelve studies involving 1,358 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis results showed that the EA group was superior to the control group in terms of clinical response rate (OR = 2.63, 95% CI = 1.97 to 3.53) and videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) score (MD = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.29 to 1.16). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the standardized swallowing assessment (SSA) score (MD = -3.11, 95% CI = -6.45 to 0.23), Rosenbek penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) score (MD = -0.68, 95% CI = -2.78 to 1.41), Swallowing Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL) score (MD = 13.24, 95% CI = -7.74 to 34.21), or incidence of adverse events (OR = 1.58, 95% CI = 0.73 to 3.38). CONCLUSION: This study shows that EA combined with conventional treatment or other interventions can significantly improve the clinical response rate and VFSS score in patients with PSD without increasing adverse reactions.: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=396840.
引言:中风后吞咽困难(PSD)的最佳治疗策略仍有待探索。电针(EA)因其简便、价廉和安全而受到广泛关注。然而,电针治疗PSD的疗效缺乏高水平循证医学支持。本研究旨在系统评价电针治疗PSD的临床价值。 方法:检索七个数据库中的相关文献。使用改良的Jadad量表评估所有关于单独电针或电针联合其他干预措施治疗PSD的随机对照试验(RCT)。纳入评分≥4分的研究。然后使用Cochrane协作网工具评估纳入研究的质量。使用Rev. Man 5.3软件进行荟萃分析。 结果:荟萃分析纳入了12项研究,共1358例患者。荟萃分析结果显示,电针组在临床有效率(OR = 2.63,95%CI = 1.97至3.53)和电视荧光吞咽造影检查(VFSS)评分(MD = 0.73,95%CI = 0.29至1.16)方面优于对照组。两组在标准吞咽评估(SSA)评分(MD = -3.11,95%CI = -6.45至0.23)、罗森贝克渗透-误吸量表(PAS)评分(MD = -0.68,95%CI = -2.78至1.41)、吞咽生活质量(SWAL-QOL)评分(MD = 13.24,95%CI = -7.74至34.21)或不良事件发生率(OR = 1.58,95%CI = 0.73至3.38)方面无显著差异。 结论:本研究表明,电针联合传统治疗或其他干预措施可显著提高PSD患者的临床有效率和VFSS评分,且不增加不良反应。:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=396840
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020-9-26
Front Neurol. 2023-5-26
Front Psychiatry. 2024-7-11
Neurol Sci. 2022-1
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020-9-26