Summers R W, Switz D M, Sessions J T, Becktel J M, Best W R, Kern F, Singleton J W
Gastroenterology. 1979 Oct;77(4 Pt 2):847-69.
The response of active and quiescent Crohn's disease to prednisone, sulfasalazine, or azathioprine has been studied in 569 patients in a placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter cooperative trial. The response of active symptomatic disease to prednisone or sulfasalazine was significantly better than to placebo. Response to azathioprine was better than to placebo, but the difference did not reach conventional levels of statistical significance. Patients with colonic involvement were especially responsive to sulfasalazine, and those with small bowel involvement were especially responsive to prednisone. Patients' drug therapy immediately before entry to the study significantly affected subsequent response. For patients with quiescent disease, none of the drugs was superior to placebo in prophylaxis against flare-up or recurrence. There is less than a 5% risk that a clinically significant prophylactic effect of any of the drug regimens was missed.
在一项安慰剂对照、随机、多中心合作试验中,对569例患者研究了活动性和静止期克罗恩病对泼尼松、柳氮磺胺吡啶或硫唑嘌呤的反应。活动性症状性疾病对泼尼松或柳氮磺胺吡啶的反应明显优于安慰剂。对硫唑嘌呤的反应优于安慰剂,但差异未达到传统的统计学显著水平。结肠受累的患者对柳氮磺胺吡啶特别敏感,而小肠受累的患者对泼尼松特别敏感。患者在进入研究前立即进行的药物治疗显著影响随后的反应。对于静止期疾病患者,在预防病情发作或复发方面,没有一种药物优于安慰剂。任何一种药物方案具有临床显著预防作用而未被发现的风险小于5%。