• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估 Liaison® 化学发光法作为急性 EBV 感染检测的筛查工具的诊断性能:一项比较研究。

Evaluating the diagnostic performance of Liaison® chemiluminescence assay as screening tool for detection of acute Epstein-Barr infection: A comparative study.

机构信息

Laboratory Department, Hospital Univeritari i Politècnic la Fe. Av Fernando Abril Martorell 106; 46026 València, Spain.

Microbiology Department, Hospital Univeritari i Politècnic la Fe. Av Fernando Abril Martorell 106; 46026 València, Spain.

出版信息

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 Mar;108(3):116167. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2023.116167. Epub 2023 Dec 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2023.116167
PMID:38176302
Abstract

The present investigation assessed the Liaison® diagnostic performance in detecting Epstein-Barr (EBV) IgM-VCA in a large patient cohort, considering age and symptomatology. VIDAS® were employed as a benchmark for acute EBV infection. The study also probed other coexisting conditions and potential cross-reactivity for error sources. A total of 1311 samples were analyzed, with notable associations found only among paediatric (kappa=0.75) and young adult (kappa=0.58) populations with compatible symptoms. ROC analysis revealed varying optimal cutoff values based on age and symptom categorizations. Logistic regression models identified age and patients from Oncology or Infectious Disease as significant factors for false positives. Potential interferences emerged with RF, ANCA, cytomegalovirus-IgM and VHS-IgM. Notably, Liaison® couldn´t distinguish EBV patients from Oncology, Haemathology or Internal Medicine. This study provides valuable insights, such as implementing ageand symptom-specific thresholds or reviewing test requests, for optimizing EBV serology in microbiology laboratories, leading to faster and more reliable responses.

摘要

本研究评估了 Liaison® 在检测大样本队列中 EBV IgM-VCA 时的诊断性能,同时考虑了年龄和症状。VIDAS® 被用作急性 EBV 感染的基准。该研究还探讨了其他共存情况和潜在的交叉反应,以确定误差来源。共分析了 1311 个样本,仅在儿科(kappa=0.75)和年轻成人(kappa=0.58)具有相符症状的人群中发现了显著相关性。ROC 分析显示,基于年龄和症状分类,最佳截断值有所不同。逻辑回归模型确定年龄和来自肿瘤学或传染病学的患者是假阳性的重要因素。RF、ANCA、巨细胞病毒 IgM 和 VHS IgM 可能存在干扰。值得注意的是,Liaison® 无法区分肿瘤学、血液学或内科的 EBV 患者。本研究为优化微生物学实验室中的 EBV 血清学提供了有价值的见解,例如实施基于年龄和症状的阈值或审查检测请求,以实现更快、更可靠的反应。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the diagnostic performance of Liaison® chemiluminescence assay as screening tool for detection of acute Epstein-Barr infection: A comparative study.评估 Liaison® 化学发光法作为急性 EBV 感染检测的筛查工具的诊断性能:一项比较研究。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 Mar;108(3):116167. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2023.116167. Epub 2023 Dec 24.
2
Evaluation of Abbott Architect, Siemens Immulite, bioMerieux Vidas, and Euroimmune assays for determination of Epstein-Barr virus serological diagnosis.评价 Abbott Architect、Siemens Immulite、bioMerieux Vidas 和 Euroimmune 检测试剂盒用于 EB 病毒血清学诊断的性能。
J Med Virol. 2021 Nov;93(11):6309-6316. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27262. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
3
Comparison of Elecsys and Liaison immunoassays to determine Epstein-Barr virus serological status using further diagnostic approaches to clarify discrepant results.比较 Elecsys 和 Liaison 免疫测定法,以进一步明确诊断方法来确定 Epstein-Barr 病毒血清学状态,从而澄清结果差异。
J Med Virol. 2023 Jan;95(1):e28166. doi: 10.1002/jmv.28166. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
4
Comparison of Abbott Architect, Siemens Immulite, and Diasorin Liaison for determination of Epstein-Barr virus serological diagnosis.比较雅培Architect、西门子Immulite和索灵Liaison在爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒血清学诊断测定中的表现。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018 Feb;90(2):96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.10.020. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
5
Diagnostic Performance and Comparative Evaluation of the Architect, Liaison, and Platelia Epstein-Barr Virus Antibody Assays.Architect、Liaison 和 Platelia Epstein-Barr 病毒抗体检测分析的诊断性能和比较评估。
Ann Lab Med. 2018 Sep;38(5):458-465. doi: 10.3343/alm.2018.38.5.458.
6
Performance of two commercially available automated immunoassays for the determination of Epstein-Barr virus serological status.两种市售自动化免疫测定法用于确定爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒血清学状态的性能。
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012 Jun;19(6):929-34. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00100-12. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
7
Analytical performance evaluation of the Elecsys Epstein-Barr virus immunoassay panel.罗氏电化学发光法检测爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒免疫分析试剂盒的分析性能评估
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Nov;101(3):115443. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115443. Epub 2021 May 29.
8
[Evaluation of immunoblot-based assay for detecting Epstein-Barr virus viral capsid antibodies].基于免疫印迹法检测爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒衣壳抗体的分析评估
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2010 Apr;44(2):231-6.
9
Evaluation of the Architect Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) viral capsid antigen (VCA) IgG, VCA IgM, and EBV nuclear antigen 1 IgG chemiluminescent immunoassays for detection of EBV antibodies and categorization of EBV infection status using immunofluorescence assays as the reference method.以免疫荧光法为参考方法,评估Architect爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒(EBV)病毒衣壳抗原(VCA)IgG、VCA IgM和EBV核抗原1 IgG化学发光免疫分析法用于检测EBV抗体及对EBV感染状态进行分类的情况。
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2014 May;21(5):684-8. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00104-14. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
10
Acute parvovirus B19 infection frequently causes false-positive results in Epstein-Barr virus- and herpes simplex virus-specific immunoglobulin M determinations done on the Liaison platform.急性B19微小病毒感染常导致在Liaison平台上进行的爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒和单纯疱疹病毒特异性免疫球蛋白M检测出现假阳性结果。
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2009 Mar;16(3):372-5. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00380-08. Epub 2008 Dec 30.

引用本文的文献

1
VirClia chemiluminescent assays as a tool for detecting Bartonella Henselae and Coxiella burnetii infections.VirClia化学发光检测法作为检测汉赛巴尔通体和伯纳特立克次体感染的工具。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2025 Aug 13. doi: 10.1007/s10096-025-05223-4.
2
Evolution of Epstein-Barr Virus Infection Seroprevalence in a French University Hospital over 11 Years, Including the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2013-2023.2013年至2023年,包括新冠疫情期间,法国一家大学医院11年间爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒感染血清流行率的演变
Microorganisms. 2025 Mar 25;13(4):733. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13040733.