KEM Hospital Research Centre, Rasta Peth, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Ganeshkhind, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Indian Institute of Public Health, Shillong, Pasteur Hills, Lawmali, Shillong, Meghalaya, India.
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 5;19(1):e0296643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296643. eCollection 2024.
Patient-reported measures of encounters in healthcare settings and consideration of their preferences could provide valuable inputs to improve healthcare quality. Although there are increasing reports of user experiences regarding health care in India in recent times, there is a lack of evidence from Indian healthcare settings on the care provided for patients with chronic diseases.
We selected diabetes mellitus and cancer as representatives of two common conditions requiring different care pathways. We conducted a scoping review of studies reporting experiences or preferences of patients/caregivers for these conditions, in PubMed, Global Index Medicus and grey literature, from the year 2000 onwards. Both published and emergent themes were derived from the data and summarised as a narrative synthesis.
Of 95 included studies (49 diabetes, 46 cancer), 73% (65) were exclusively quantitative surveys, 79% included only patients (75), and 59.5% (44) were conducted in government centres. Studies were concentrated in a few states in India, with the underrepresentation of vulnerable population groups and representative studies. There was a lack of standardised tools and comprehensive approaches for assessing experiences and preferences of patients and caregivers, concerning diabetes and cancers in India. The commonest type of care assessed was therapeutic (74), with 14 cancer studies on diagnosis and nine on palliative care. Repeated visits to crowded centres, drug refill issues, unavailability of specific services in government facilities, and expensive private care characterised diabetes care, while cancer care involved delayed diagnosis and treatment, communication, and pain management issues.
There is a need for robust approaches and standardised tools to measure responsiveness of the healthcare system to patient needs, across geographical and population subgroups in India. Health system reforms are needed to improve access to high-quality care for treatment and palliation of cancer and management of chronic diseases such as diabetes.
患者在医疗保健环境中的就诊体验及其偏好的考量可以为改善医疗质量提供有价值的信息。尽管近年来有关印度医疗保健的用户体验报告越来越多,但缺乏印度医疗保健环境中关于慢性病患者护理的证据。
我们选择糖尿病和癌症作为两种需要不同护理途径的常见疾病的代表。我们对 2000 年以来在 PubMed、全球索引医学和灰色文献中报告患者/照护者对这些疾病的体验或偏好的研究进行了范围综述。从数据中得出并以叙述性综合报告的形式总结了已发表和新兴主题。
在纳入的 95 项研究中(49 项糖尿病,46 项癌症),73%(65 项)是纯定量调查,79%(75 项)仅包括患者,59.5%(44 项)在政府中心进行。研究集中在印度的几个邦,弱势群体和代表性研究的代表性不足。在印度,针对糖尿病和癌症患者及其照护者的体验和偏好,缺乏标准化工具和全面评估方法。评估最多的护理类型是治疗性的(74%),14 项癌症研究涉及诊断,9 项研究涉及姑息治疗。频繁前往拥挤的中心、药物续配问题、政府设施缺乏特定服务以及昂贵的私人护理是糖尿病护理的特点,而癌症护理则涉及诊断和治疗延迟、沟通和疼痛管理问题。
印度需要采用稳健的方法和标准化工具,针对医疗保健系统对患者需求的响应情况,在地理和人口亚组之间进行评估。需要进行卫生系统改革,以改善癌症治疗和姑息治疗以及慢性病(如糖尿病)管理方面的高质量护理的获取机会。