Suppr超能文献

全基因组关联研究轻度缺血性脑卒中 3 种不同恢复表型。

Genome-Wide Association Studies of 3 Distinct Recovery Phenotypes in Mild Ischemic Stroke.

机构信息

From the Department of Neurology (C.M.A., B.B.W.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Department of Neurology (R.B., J.W.C.), University of Maryland, Baltimore; Program in Physical Therapy (K.L.), Washington University; Department of Neurology (K.L.), Washington University, St. Louis, MO; Department of Neurology (A.H.), Center for Brain and Mind Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT; Department of Neurology (S.C.C.), University of California Los Angeles; California Rehabilitation Institute (S.C.C.), Los Angeles; Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Neurology (A.G.L.), Lund University; Department of Neurology (A.G.L.), Skane University Hospital, Sweden; Department of Public Health Sciences (K.L.K., B.B.W.); Center for Health Equity and Precision Public Health (K.L.K.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; and Department of Biostatistics (F.-C.H.), School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC.

出版信息

Neurology. 2024 Feb 13;102(3):e208011. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000208011. Epub 2024 Jan 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Stroke genetic research has made substantial progress in the past decade. Its recovery application, however, remains behind, in part due to its reliance on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score as a measure of poststroke outcome. The mRS does not map well to biological processes because numerous psychosocial factors drive much of what the mRS captures. Second, the mRS contains multiple disparate biological events into a single measure further limiting its use for biological discovery. This led us to investigate the effect of distinct stroke recovery phenotypes on genetic variation associations with Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWASs) by repurposing the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and its subscores.

METHODS

In the Vitamin Intervention for Stroke Prevention cohort, we estimated changes in cognition, motor, and global impairments over 2 years using specific measures. We included genotyped participants with a total NIHSS score greater than zero at randomization and excluded those with recurrent stroke during the trial. A GWAS linear mixed-effects model predicted score changes, with participant as a random effect, and included initial score, age, sex, treatment group, and the first 5 ancestry principal components.

RESULTS

In total, 1,270 participants (64% male) were included with a median NIHSS score of 2 (interquartile range [IQR] 1-3) and median age 68 (IQR 59-75) years. At randomization, 20% had cognitive deficits (NIHSS Cog-4 score >0) and 70% had ≥1 motor deficits (impairment score >1). At 2 years, these percentages improved to 7.2% with cognitive deficits and 30% with motor deficits. GWAS identified novel suggestive gene-impairment associations ( < 5e) for cognition (, , , , , and ), motor (, , , , , and ), and global ( and ) impairments.

DISCUSSION

Defining domain-specific stroke recovery phenotypes and using longitudinal clinical trial designs can help detect novel genes associated with chronic recovery. These data support the use of granular endpoints to identify genetic associations related to stroke recovery.

摘要

背景与目的

在过去十年中,中风遗传学研究取得了重大进展。然而,其恢复应用仍落后于其他领域,部分原因是它依赖于改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)评分作为中风后结果的衡量标准。mRS 与生物过程并不吻合,因为许多社会心理因素驱动了 mRS 所捕捉到的大部分内容。其次,mRS 将多个不同的生物事件纳入一个单一的测量标准,进一步限制了它在生物发现中的应用。这促使我们通过重新利用 NIH 中风量表(NIHSS)及其子评分来研究不同的中风恢复表型对与全基因组关联研究(GWAS)相关的遗传变异的影响。

方法

在维生素干预预防中风队列中,我们使用特定的措施估计了认知、运动和整体障碍在 2 年内的变化。我们纳入了在随机分组时 NIHSS 总分大于零的基因分型参与者,并排除了在试验期间再次中风的参与者。GWAS 线性混合效应模型预测了评分变化,参与者作为随机效应,包括初始评分、年龄、性别、治疗组和前 5 个祖先主成分。

结果

总共纳入了 1270 名参与者(64%为男性),其 NIHSS 评分中位数为 2(四分位间距 [IQR] 1-3),年龄中位数为 68(IQR 59-75)岁。在随机分组时,20%的人存在认知缺陷(NIHSS Cog-4 评分>0),70%的人存在≥1 个运动缺陷(损伤评分>1)。2 年后,认知缺陷的百分比改善到 7.2%,运动缺陷的百分比改善到 30%。GWAS 确定了认知(、、、、、和)、运动(、、、、、和)和整体(和)损伤的新的提示性基因-损伤关联(<5e)。

讨论

定义特定于领域的中风恢复表型并使用纵向临床试验设计可以帮助检测与慢性恢复相关的新基因。这些数据支持使用粒度终点来识别与中风恢复相关的遗传关联。

相似文献

1
Genome-Wide Association Studies of 3 Distinct Recovery Phenotypes in Mild Ischemic Stroke.
Neurology. 2024 Feb 13;102(3):e208011. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000208011. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
2
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms Associated With Motor Recovery in Patients With Nondisabling Stroke: GWAS Study.
Neurology. 2023 Nov 21;101(21):e2114-e2125. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207716. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
3
Post Stroke Motor Recovery Genome Wide Association Study: .
medRxiv. 2023 Feb 17:2023.02.16.23286040. doi: 10.1101/2023.02.16.23286040.
5
Association of Modified Rankin Scale With Recovery Phenotypes in Patients With Upper Extremity Weakness After Stroke.
Neurology. 2022 May 3;98(18):e1877-e1885. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200154. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
6
Adiposity and domain-specific stroke recovery: A Mendelian randomization study.
Eur Stroke J. 2025 Feb 15:23969873251319916. doi: 10.1177/23969873251319916.
8
Genetic Variation and Stroke Recovery: The STRONG Study.
Stroke. 2024 Aug;55(8):2094-2102. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.047643. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
9
Twenty-Four-Hour Post-Thrombolysis NIHSS Score As the Strongest Prognostic Predictor After Acute Ischemic Stroke: ENCHANTED Study.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Sep 17;13(18):e036109. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036109. Epub 2024 Sep 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Genomics of stroke recovery and outcome.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2025 Apr 11:271678X251332528. doi: 10.1177/0271678X251332528.
2
Adiposity and domain-specific stroke recovery: A Mendelian randomization study.
Eur Stroke J. 2025 Feb 15:23969873251319916. doi: 10.1177/23969873251319916.
3
2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.
Circulation. 2025 Feb 25;151(8):e41-e660. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001303. Epub 2025 Jan 27.

本文引用的文献

2
Domain-Specific Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials of Therapies Promoting Stroke Recovery: A Suggested Blueprint.
Stroke. 2023 Mar;54(3):e86-e90. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.042313. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
3
Genetic architecture of the white matter connectome of the human brain.
Sci Adv. 2023 Feb 17;9(7):eadd2870. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.add2870.
4
Stroke genetics informs drug discovery and risk prediction across ancestries.
Nature. 2022 Nov;611(7934):115-123. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05165-3. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
5
A Polygenic Risk Score Based on a Cardioembolic Stroke Multitrait Analysis Improves a Clinical Prediction Model for This Stroke Subtype.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jul 8;9:940696. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.940696. eCollection 2022.
6
Left Hemisphere Bias of NIH Stroke Scale Is Most Severe for Middle Cerebral Artery Strokes.
Front Neurol. 2022 Jun 14;13:912782. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.912782. eCollection 2022.
7
Stroke recovery phenotyping through network trajectory approaches and graph neural networks.
Brain Inform. 2022 Jun 19;9(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40708-022-00160-w.
8
Multi-ancestry GWAS reveals excitotoxicity associated with outcome after ischaemic stroke.
Brain. 2022 Jul 29;145(7):2394-2406. doi: 10.1093/brain/awac080.
10
Genetic Factors, Brain Atrophy, and Response to Rehabilitation Therapy After Stroke.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2022 Feb;36(2):131-139. doi: 10.1177/15459683211062899. Epub 2021 Dec 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验