Khanna Ashish K, Banga Akshat, Rigdon Joseph, White Brian N, Cuvillier Christian, Ferraz Joao, Olsen Fredrik, Hackett Loren, Bansal Vikas, Kaw Roop
Department of Anesthesiology, Section on Critical Care Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA; Perioperative Outcomes and Informatics Collaborative (POIC), Winston-Salem, NC, USA; Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, Sawai Man Singh Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
J Clin Anesth. 2024 Jun;94:111374. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111374. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
The current standards of postoperative respiratory monitoring on medical-surgical floors involve spot-pulse oximetry checks every 4-8 h, which can miss the opportunity to detect prolonged hypoxia and acute hypercapnia. Continuous respiratory monitoring can recognize acute respiratory depression episodes; however, the existing evidence is limited. We sought to review the current evidence on the effectiveness of continuous pulse oximetry (CPOX) with and without capnography versus routine monitoring and their effectiveness for detecting postoperative respiratory failure, opioid-induced respiratory depression, and preventing downstream adverse events.
We performed a systematic literature search on Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for articles published between 1990 and April 2023. The study protocol was registered in Prospero (ID: 439467), and PRISMA guidelines were followed. The NIH quality assessment tool was used to assess the quality of the studies. Pooled analysis was conducted using the software R version 4.1.1 and the package meta. The stability of the results was assessed using sensitivity analysis.
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Postoperative recovery area.
56,538 patients, ASA class II to IV, non-invasive respiratory monitoring, and post-operative respiratory depression.
Continuous pulse oximetry with or without capnography versus routine monitoring.
Respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, adverse events, and rescue events.
23 studies (17 examined CPOX without capnography and 5 examined CPOX with capnography) were included in this systematic review. CPOX was better at recognizing desaturation (SpO < 90%) OR: 11.94 (95% CI: 6.85, 20.82; p < 0.01) compared to standard monitoring. No significant differences were reported for ICU transfer, reintubation, and non-invasive ventilation between the two groups.
Oxygen desaturation was the only outcome better detected with CPOX in postoperative patients in hospital wards. These comparisons were limited by the small number of studies that could be pooled for each outcome and the heterogeneity between the studies.
目前内外科病房术后呼吸监测的标准是每4 - 8小时进行一次脉搏血氧饱和度抽查,这可能会错过检测持续性低氧血症和急性高碳酸血症的机会。持续呼吸监测能够识别急性呼吸抑制发作;然而,现有证据有限。我们试图回顾当前关于有无二氧化碳监测的持续脉搏血氧饱和度监测(CPOX)与常规监测的有效性及其对检测术后呼吸衰竭、阿片类药物引起的呼吸抑制以及预防下游不良事件的有效性的证据。
我们在Ovid Medline、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库中对1990年至2023年4月发表的文章进行了系统的文献检索。研究方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(注册号:439467)注册,并遵循PRISMA指南。使用美国国立卫生研究院质量评估工具来评估研究质量。使用R版本4.1.1软件和meta包进行汇总分析。使用敏感性分析评估结果的稳定性。
系统评价和荟萃分析。
术后恢复区。
56538例患者,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级为II至IV级,进行无创呼吸监测,且有术后呼吸抑制。
有无二氧化碳监测的持续脉搏血氧饱和度监测与常规监测。
呼吸频率、血氧饱和度、不良事件和抢救事件。
本系统评价纳入了23项研究(17项研究检测了无二氧化碳监测的CPOX,5项研究检测了有二氧化碳监测的CPOX)。与标准监测相比,CPOX在识别血氧饱和度下降(SpO < 90%)方面表现更好,比值比(OR)为11.94(95%置信区间:6.85,20.82;p < 0.01)。两组在重症监护病房(ICU)转运、再次插管和无创通气方面未报告显著差异。
在医院病房的术后患者中,血氧饱和度下降是唯一通过CPOX能更好检测到的结果。这些比较受到每个结果可汇总的研究数量较少以及研究之间异质性的限制。