Lam Thach, Nagappa Mahesh, Wong Jean, Singh Mandeep, Wong David, Chung Frances
From the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre and St. Joseph Health Care, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Anesth Analg. 2017 Dec;125(6):2019-2029. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002557.
Death and anoxic brain injury from unrecognized postoperative respiratory depression (PORD) is a serious concern for patient safety. The American Patient Safety Foundation has called for continuous electronic monitoring for all patients receiving opioids in the postoperative period. These recommendations are based largely on consensus opinion with currently limited evidence. The objective of this study is to review the current state of knowledge on the effectiveness of continuous pulse oximetry (CPOX) versus routine nursing care and the effectiveness of continuous capnography monitoring with or without pulse oximetry for detecting PORD and preventing postoperative adverse events in the surgical ward.
We performed a systematic search of the literature databases published between 1946 and May 2017. We selected the studies that included the following: (1) adult surgical patients (>18 years old); (2) prescribed opioids during the postoperative period; (3) monitored with CPOX and/or capnography; (4) primary outcome measures were oxygen desaturation, bradypnea, hypercarbia, rescue team activation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, or mortality; and (5) studies published in the English language. Meta-analysis was performed using Cochrane Review Manager 5.3.
In total, 9 studies (4 examining CPOX and 5 examining continuous capnography) were included in this systematic review. In the literature on CPOX, 1 randomized controlled trial showed no difference in ICU transfers (6.7% vs 8.5%; P = .33) or mortality (2.3% vs 2.2%). A prospective historical controlled trial demonstrated a significant reduction in ICU transfers (5.6-1.2 per 1000 patient days; P = .01) and rescue team activation (3.4-1.2 per 1000 patient days; P = .02) when CPOX was used. Overall, comparing the CPOX group versus the standard monitoring group, there was 34% risk reduction in ICU transfer (P = .06) and odds of recognizing desaturation (oxygen saturation [SpO2] <90% >1 hour) was 15 times higher (P < .00001). Pooled data from 3 capnography studies showed that continuous capnography group identified 8.6% more PORD events versus pulse oximetry monitoring group (CO2 group versus SpO2 group: 11.5% vs 2.8%; P < .00001). The odds of recognizing PORD was almost 6 times higher in the capnography versus the pulse oximetry group (odds ratio: 5.83, 95% confidence interval, 3.54-9.63; P < .00001). No studies examined the impact of continuous capnography on reducing rescue team activation, ICU transfers, or mortality.
The use of CPOX on the surgical ward is associated with significant improvement in the detection of oxygen desaturation versus intermittent nursing spot-checks. There is a trend toward less ICU transfers with CPOX versus standard monitoring. The evidence on whether the detection of oxygen desaturation leads to less rescue team activation and mortality is inconclusive. Capnography provides an early warning of PORD before oxygen desaturation, especially when supplemental oxygen is administered. Improved education regarding monitoring and further research with high-quality randomized controlled trials is needed.
未被识别的术后呼吸抑制(PORD)导致的死亡和缺氧性脑损伤是患者安全的严重问题。美国患者安全基金会呼吁对所有术后接受阿片类药物治疗的患者进行持续电子监测。这些建议主要基于共识意见,目前证据有限。本研究的目的是回顾关于持续脉搏血氧饱和度监测(CPOX)与常规护理效果以及联合或不联合脉搏血氧饱和度监测的持续二氧化碳监测对于在外科病房中检测PORD和预防术后不良事件效果的现有知识状况。
我们对1946年至2017年5月期间发表的文献数据库进行了系统检索。我们选择了包括以下内容的研究:(1)成年外科患者(>18岁);(2)术后开具阿片类药物;(3)采用CPOX和/或二氧化碳监测;(4)主要结局指标为氧饱和度降低、呼吸过缓、高碳酸血症、启动抢救团队、入住重症监护病房(ICU)或死亡率;以及(5)以英文发表的研究。使用Cochrane系统评价软件5.3进行荟萃分析。
本系统评价共纳入9项研究(4项研究CPOX,5项研究持续二氧化碳监测)。在关于CPOX的文献中,1项随机对照试验显示在ICU转归(6.7%对8.5%;P = 0.33)或死亡率(2.3%对2.2%)方面无差异。一项前瞻性历史对照试验表明,使用CPOX时ICU转归(每1000患者日从5.6降至1.2;P = 0.01)和抢救团队启动(每1000患者日从3.4降至1.2;P = 0.02)显著减少。总体而言,比较CPOX组与标准监测组,ICU转归风险降低34%(P = 0.06),识别氧饱和度降低(血氧饱和度[SpO2]<90%超过1小时)的几率高出15倍(P < 0.00001)。来自3项二氧化碳监测研究的汇总数据显示,持续二氧化碳监测组比脉搏血氧饱和度监测组多识别出8.6%的PORD事件(二氧化碳组对SpO2组:11.5%对2.8%;P < 0.00001)。二氧化碳监测组识别PORD的几率几乎是脉搏血氧饱和度监测组的6倍(比值比:5.83,95%置信区间,3.54 - 9.63;P < 0.00001)。没有研究考察持续二氧化碳监测对减少抢救团队启动、ICU转归或死亡率的影响。
在外科病房使用CPOX与相较于间歇性护理抽查在检测氧饱和度降低方面有显著改善相关。与标准监测相比,CPOX有减少ICU转归的趋势。关于检测氧饱和度降低是否会减少抢救团队启动和死亡率的证据尚无定论。二氧化碳监测在氧饱和度降低之前就能对PORD发出早期预警,尤其是在给予补充氧气时。需要加强关于监测的教育并开展高质量随机对照试验的进一步研究。