Zarrintan Armin, Ibrahim Mohamed K, Hamouda Noha, Jabal Mohamed Sobhi, Beizavi Zahra, Ghozy Sherief, Kallmes David F
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
J Neuroimaging. 2024 Mar-Apr;34(2):195-204. doi: 10.1111/jon.13184. Epub 2024 Jan 7.
The Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) is a widely used scoring system for evaluating ischemic stroke to determine therapeutic strategy. However, there is variation in the interobserver agreement of ASPECTS. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the interobserver agreement of total and regional ASPECTS.
A comprehensive search was conducted in the Web of Sciences, PubMed, and Scopus databases to identify relevant studies. Inclusion criteria were studies of noncontrast CT performed within 24 hours of ischemic stroke in the middle cerebral artery territory.
A total of 20 studies, with 3482 patients, reporting interobserver agreement of total and regional ASPECTS were included in the meta-analysis. The interobserver agreement for total ASPECTS in studies using Kappa coefficient (κ) analysis was substantial (κ = .67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: .57-.78). In studies using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis, agreement was excellent (ICC = .84, 95% CI: .77-.90). Interobserver agreement was higher in studies in which the observer was unblinded to clinical scenario in both groups (κ = .74, 95% CI: .59-.89, and ICC = .82, 95% CI: .79-.85). Per-region analysis showed that the caudate nucleus had the highest agreement (κ = .68, 95% CI: .60-.76, and ICC = .84, 95% CI: .74-.93), while M2 and internal capsule in Kappa studies (κ = .45, 95% CI: .34-.55 and κ = .47, 95% CI: .28-.66), and M4 and internal capsule in ICC studies (ICC = .54, 95% CI: .43-.64 and ICC = .55, 95% CI: .18-.91) had the lowest agreement.
This meta-analysis demonstrates substantial to excellent interobserver agreement for total ASPECTS, which supports using this method for stroke treatment. However, findings emphasize the need to consider interobserver agreement in specific regions of ASPECTS for treatment decisions.
阿尔伯塔卒中项目早期CT评分(ASPECTS)是一种广泛用于评估缺血性卒中以确定治疗策略的评分系统。然而,ASPECTS的观察者间一致性存在差异。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在研究总ASPECTS和区域ASPECTS的观察者间一致性。
在科学网、PubMed和Scopus数据库中进行全面检索,以识别相关研究。纳入标准为在大脑中动脉区域缺血性卒中24小时内进行的非增强CT研究。
共有20项研究、3482例患者报告了总ASPECTS和区域ASPECTS的观察者间一致性,纳入荟萃分析。使用Kappa系数(κ)分析的研究中,总ASPECTS的观察者间一致性较高(κ = 0.67,95%置信区间[CI]:0.57 - 0.78)。在使用组内相关系数(ICC)分析的研究中,一致性极佳(ICC = 0.84,95% CI:0.77 - 0.90)。在两组观察者均未对临床情况设盲的研究中,观察者间一致性更高(κ = 0.74,95% CI:0.59 - 0.89,ICC = 0.82,95% CI:0.79 - 0.85)。按区域分析显示,尾状核的一致性最高(κ = 0.68,95% CI:0.60 - 0.76,ICC = 0.84,95% CI:0.74 - 0.93),而在Kappa研究中的M2和内囊(κ = 0.45,95% CI:0.34 - 0.55和κ = 0.