• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

花粉变应原滴剂治疗季节性变应性鼻炎的疗效观察及依从性分析

[Efficacy observation and compliance analysis of pollen allergen drops in seasonal allergic rhinitis].

作者信息

Yu D D, Liu Y, Zheng Z Y, Zhang J, Gao L, Zhang M, He C, Hao J L, Zhang K J, Feng Y

机构信息

First Clinical Medical College, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China.

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023 Dec 6;57(12):1996-2001. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20230711-00002.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20230711-00002
PMID:38186147
Abstract

To study the efficacy and compliance analysis of pollen allergen drops in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. The method of single-center controlled was used to analyze the dates' results. From July 2021 to September 2021, 80 patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis were referred to the clinic of otorhinolaryngology in First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University.40 patients received sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT group), and the other 40 patients received symptomatic drug treatment as the control group. The total rhinoconjunctivitis symptom score (TRSS), the visual analogue scale(VAS), total medication score (TMS) and combined scores of medication and rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms (CSMRS) of the patient before the start of the treatment and after the first year of the treatment were compared to assess the efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy of Artemisia pollen. Follow the shedding during the study, the safety of the drug and the causes for compliance analysis were analyzed and recorded. The results of comparison with TRSS, VAS, TMS and CSMRS in two groups in the period of pretherapy were as follows: TRSS(12.393±3.023, 12.450±3.029, =-0.077, =0.939), VAS(8.357±1.026, 8.400±0.982, =-0.173, =0.862), TMS(3.214±0.568, 3.175±0.501, =0.301, =0.764), CSMRS (5.286±0.680, 5.253±0.677, =0.199, =0.843), there was no significant difference (>0.05); lower observed symptom scores were got in the post-treatment pollen peak SLIT group compared to the control group, TRSS(3.964±1.551, 7.750±2.169, =-7.918, P<0.05), VAS(2.893±0.956, 5.175±1.481, =-8.286, <0.05), TMS (1.821±0.863, 3.175±0.501, =-8.163, <0.05), CSMRS (2.489±0.921, 4.468±0.601, =-10.723, <0.05), and the differences between the groups were statistically significant (<0.05); the SLIT group significantly reduced all symptom scores at the first peak compared to the starting, TRSS(12.393±3.023, 3.964±1.551, =20.576, <0.05), VAS (8.357±1.026, 2.893±0.956, =30.070, <0.05), TMS (3.214±0.568, 1.821±0.863, =7.151, <0.05), CSMRS(5.286±0.680, 2.489±0.921, =14.533, <0.05) and there was statistical difference (<0.05). No significant adverse reactions occured during medication in the SLIT group. A total of 12 cases were shed in the SLIT group, so the compliance rate was 70%. The four reasons were that patients considered the course was long (4 cases, 33%); the drugs were expensive (3 cases, 25%); patients were busy with their work and life (3 cases, 25%); patients were affected by the outbreak (2 cases, 17%). In summary, Artemisia pollen sublingual drops may improve the symptoms of the patients who got allergic rhinitis caused by Artemisia pollen after the treatment for one year. However, due to the lack of sufficient understanding of immunotherapy or the difficulty in adhering to standardized medication, the compliance with sublingual immunotherapy is still poor, the compliance with sublingual immunotherapy needs to be further improved through patient education.

摘要

研究花粉变应原滴剂治疗变应性鼻炎的疗效及依从性分析。采用单中心对照方法分析数据结果。2021年7月至2021年9月,80例季节性变应性鼻炎患者被转诊至山西医科大学第一医院耳鼻咽喉科门诊。40例患者接受舌下免疫治疗(SLIT组),另外40例患者接受对症药物治疗作为对照组。比较治疗开始前及治疗1年后患者的鼻结膜炎总症状评分(TRSS)、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、总用药评分(TMS)以及用药与鼻结膜炎症状综合评分(CSMRS),以评估蒿属花粉舌下免疫治疗的疗效。随访研究期间的脱落情况,分析并记录药物安全性及依从性原因。两组治疗前TRSS、VAS、TMS和CSMRS的比较结果如下:TRSS(12.393±3.023,12.450±3.029,=-0.077,=0.939),VAS(8.357±1.026,8.400±0.982,=-0.173,=0.862),TMS(3.214±0.568,3.175±0.501,=0.301,=0.764),CSMRS(5.286±0.680,5.253±0.677,=0.199,=0.843),差异无统计学意义(>0.05);治疗后花粉高峰期SLIT组观察到的症状评分低于对照组,TRSS(3.964±1.551,7.750±2.169,=-7.918,P<0.05),VAS(2.893±0.956,5.175±1.481,=-8.286,<0.05),TMS(1.821±0.863,3.175±0.501,=-8.163,<0.05),CSMRS(2.489±0.921,4.468±0.601,=-10.723,<0.05),组间差异有统计学意义(<0.05);与开始时相比,SLIT组在第一个高峰期所有症状评分均显著降低,TRSS(12.393±3.023,3.964±1.551,=20.576,<0.05),VAS(8.357±1.026,2.893±0.956,=30.070,<0.05),TMS(3.214±0.568,1.821±0.863,=7.151,<0.05),CSMRS(5.286±0.680,2.489±0.921,=14.533,<0.05),差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。SLIT组用药期间未发生明显不良反应。SLIT组共脱落12例,依从率为70%。四个原因分别为患者认为疗程长(4例,33%);药物昂贵(3例,25%);患者工作生活繁忙(3例,25%);受疫情影响(2例,17%)。综上所述,蒿属花粉舌下滴剂治疗1年后可能改善蒿属花粉所致变应性鼻炎患者的症状。然而,由于对免疫治疗缺乏足够了解或难以坚持规范用药,舌下免疫治疗的依从性仍然较差,需要通过患者教育进一步提高舌下免疫治疗的依从性。

相似文献

1
[Efficacy observation and compliance analysis of pollen allergen drops in seasonal allergic rhinitis].花粉变应原滴剂治疗季节性变应性鼻炎的疗效观察及依从性分析
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023 Dec 6;57(12):1996-2001. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20230711-00002.
2
Clinical efficacy and safety of coseasonal initiation of Artemisia annua sublingual immunotherapy on patients with Artemisia-induced rhinoconjunctivitis.青蒿舌下免疫治疗对蒿属花粉变应性鼻炎患者季节前起始治疗的临床疗效和安全性。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2023 Sep-Oct;44(5):103942. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.103942. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
3
Clinical efficacy in one-year treatment with Artemisia annua-SLIT drops in monosensitized and polysensitized individuals.青蒿素舌下滴剂对单敏和多敏个体进行一年治疗的临床疗效。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2023 Nov-Dec;44(6):104002. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.104002. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
4
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Artesimia annua-Sublingual Immunotherapy in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Patients Based on Different Intervention Time.基于不同干预时间的青蒿舌下免疫治疗季节性变应性鼻炎患者的临床疗效和安全性。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2022;183(8):852-859. doi: 10.1159/000524108. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
5
Efficacy and safety of Artemisia annua sublingual immunotherapy in patients with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis over two pollen seasons.双相青蒿舌下免疫治疗季节性变应性鼻结膜炎患者在两个花粉季节的疗效和安全性。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Nov;280(11):4939-4947. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08078-7. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
6
[The efficacy of sublingual specific immunotherapy in children with allergic rhinitis].[舌下特异性免疫疗法对儿童变应性鼻炎的疗效]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Apr 5;30(7):546-551. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2016.07.010.
7
Lack of effect of Timothy grass pollen sublingual immunotherapy tablet on birch pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis in an environmental exposure unit. Timothy 草花粉舌下免疫治疗片对桦树花粉诱发的变应性鼻结膜炎在环境暴露单元中的作用缺失。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018 May;120(5):495-503.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
8
Sublingual allergen immunotherapy with a liquid birch pollen product in patients with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma.舌下含服桦树花粉变应原免疫治疗伴或不伴哮喘的季节性变应性鼻炎结膜炎患者。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Mar;143(3):970-977. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.11.018. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
9
sublingual immunotherapy for seasonal allergic rhinitis: A multicenter, randomized trial.舌下免疫疗法治疗季节性变应性鼻炎:一项多中心随机试验
World Allergy Organ J. 2020 Sep 8;13(9):100458. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100458. eCollection 2020 Sep.
10
Sublingual immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis.过敏性鼻炎的舌下免疫疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(2):CD002893. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002893.