Mitchell Devon L, McGuire Laura Stone, Khalid Syed I, Alaraj Ali
Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Jan 8:15910199231224008. doi: 10.1177/15910199231224008.
Despite the heavily debated use of routine platelet-function testing, the VerifyNow Platelet Reactivity Unit (PRU) assay has been increasingly adopted as standard of care for assessing risk of postoperative thromboembolic complications of neuroendovascular surgery.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the relationship between platelet response and risk of ischemic events from neuroendovascular surgery, assess the efficacy of point-of-care platelet-function testing in predicting thromboembolic outcomes, and assess whether a clinically useful threshold for platelet response can be defined in order to standardize guidelines.
PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched. Following deduplication, articles were first screened for relevance by title and abstract, followed by full text.
Of 735 resultant articles, 22 studies consisting of 3266 patients undergoing neuroendovascular intervention were included. Diagnoses included both intracranial and extracranial pathologies, of which 45.8% were treated with flow diversion, 16.4% with stent-assisted coil embolization, 15.8% with intracranial stenting, 12.0% with simple coil embolization, 3.4% with balloon-assisted coil embolization, 3.6% with extracranial stenting, and 3.0% with an alternate method. 54.5% (12/22) of studies determined platelet hyporesponse to be an independent predictor of postoperative thromboembolic complications, with 27.3% (6/22) of studies reporting a similar, but non-statistically significant trend. 18.2% (4/22) of studies found no relationship between platelet response and postoperative thromboembolic complications. The estimated clinical threshold for PRU to prevent thromboembolic complications varied greatly across studies (Range: > 144-295 PRU). Meta-analysis found platelet hyporesponse to have a 2.23-fold increased risk of thromboembolic complications compared to normoresponders (RR = 2.23, P = 0.03).
While PRU demonstrates a significant predictive value for postoperative thromboembolic complications of neuroendovascular surgery, the target therapeutic threshold for minimizing ischemic events remains unclear. Further studies, such as large multicenter cohorts of the existing data, are needed to standardize guidelines.
尽管常规血小板功能检测的应用存在诸多争议,但VerifyNow血小板反应性单位(PRU)检测已越来越多地被用作评估神经血管内手术术后血栓栓塞并发症风险的护理标准。
我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以研究血小板反应与神经血管内手术缺血事件风险之间的关系,评估即时血小板功能检测在预测血栓栓塞结局方面的有效性,并评估是否可以定义一个对临床有用的血小板反应阈值以规范指南。
检索了PubMed、Embase和Scopus数据库。在去除重复文献后,首先通过标题和摘要筛选文章的相关性,然后进行全文筛选。
在735篇检索到的文章中,纳入了22项研究,共3266例接受神经血管内介入治疗的患者。诊断包括颅内和颅外病变,其中45.8%接受血流导向治疗,16.4%接受支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞,15.8%接受颅内支架置入,12.0%接受单纯弹簧圈栓塞,3.4%接受球囊辅助弹簧圈栓塞,3.6%接受颅外支架置入,3.0%接受其他方法治疗。54.5%(12/22)的研究确定血小板低反应是术后血栓栓塞并发症的独立预测因素,27.3%(6/22)的研究报告了类似但无统计学意义的趋势。18.2%(4/22)的研究未发现血小板反应与术后血栓栓塞并发症之间的关系。不同研究中预防血栓栓塞并发症的PRU估计临床阈值差异很大(范围:>144 - 295 PRU)。荟萃分析发现,与正常反应者相比,血小板低反应发生血栓栓塞并发症的风险增加2.23倍(RR = 2.23,P = 0.03)。
虽然PRU对神经血管内手术术后血栓栓塞并发症具有显著的预测价值,但最小化缺血事件的目标治疗阈值仍不明确。需要进一步的研究,如对现有数据进行大型多中心队列研究,以规范指南。