Carter Jeremy M, Tom Roshan B, Sunesra Raheed, Bilby Nathaniel J, Mireles Blake, Paul Krishna K, Koscumb Paul A, Cox Mitchell W, Jehle Dietrich V
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, USA.
Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, USA.
Cureus. 2023 Dec 8;15(12):e50170. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50170. eCollection 2023 Dec.
Introduction Acute aortic dissection (AAD) represents a significant diagnostic challenge with a high mortality rate if not treated promptly. This challenge arises from the diverse clinical presentations of AAD, and its symptom overlap with other medical conditions. Although both helical CT and transesophageal echocardiography are reliable diagnostic tools for AAD, they are not feasible for every suspected case. Furthermore, limited research on D-dimer's utility in ruling out AAD has been conducted due to the condition's rarity. Methods This study utilizes the TriNetX database (https://trinetx.com/), encompassing data from 54 healthcare organizations across the United States over the past two decades from 85 million patients. The objective is to evaluate the sensitivity of an elevated D-dimer level in diagnosing AAD across a much larger patient cohort than previously studied. Results Retrospectively analyzing this dataset, there were 1,319 patients identified with a confirmed AAD who had undergone D-dimer testing within a day of diagnosis. Of these, 1,252 patients exhibited D-dimer levels exceeding 400 ng/ml while 1,227 had levels surpassing 500 ng/ml. Notably, a D-dimer cutoff of 400 ng/ml demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.949 while a 500 ng/ml cutoff yielded a sensitivity of 0.930. Conclusion This large retrospective cohort study demonstrates that a blood D-dimer level is highly sensitive in assaying for AAD. The D-dimer levels analyzed showed a remarkable sensitivity in ruling out AAD, avoiding the need for more invasive testing in low-risk patients.
引言 急性主动脉夹层(AAD)是一项重大的诊断挑战,若不及时治疗,死亡率很高。这一挑战源于AAD多样的临床表现及其与其他病症的症状重叠。尽管螺旋CT和经食管超声心动图都是诊断AAD的可靠工具,但并非对每个疑似病例都可行。此外,由于该病罕见,关于D-二聚体在排除AAD方面效用的研究有限。方法 本研究利用TriNetX数据库(https://trinetx.com/),该数据库包含美国54个医疗机构在过去二十年中来自8500万患者的数据。目的是在比以往研究更大的患者队列中评估D-二聚体水平升高在诊断AAD中的敏感性。结果 对该数据集进行回顾性分析,有1319名确诊为AAD的患者在诊断当天进行了D-二聚体检测。其中,1252名患者的D-二聚体水平超过400 ng/ml,1227名患者的水平超过500 ng/ml。值得注意的是,D-二聚体临界值为400 ng/ml时敏感性为0.949,临界值为500 ng/ml时敏感性为0.930。结论这项大型回顾性队列研究表明,血液D-二聚体水平在检测AAD时具有高度敏感性。分析的D-二聚体水平在排除AAD方面显示出显著的敏感性,避免了对低风险患者进行更多侵入性检测的必要性。