Suppr超能文献

简化的概率评估评分与年龄校正 D-二聚体联合应用于急性主动脉综合征的诊断:开发与验证。

Development and Validation of a Simplified Probability Assessment Score Integrated With Age-Adjusted d-Dimer for Diagnosis of Acute Aortic Syndromes.

机构信息

S.C.U. Medicina d'UrgenzaOspedale Molinette, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza Torino Italy.

Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche Università degli Studi di Torino Torino Italy.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Feb 2;10(3):e018425. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018425. Epub 2021 Jan 21.

Abstract

Background When acute aortic syndromes (AASs) are suspected, pretest clinical probability assessment and d-dimer (DD) testing are diagnostic options allowing standardized care. Guidelines suggest use of a 12-item/3-category score (aortic dissection detection) and a DD cutoff of 500 ng/mL. However, a simplified assessment tool and a more specific DD cutoff could be advantageous. Methods and Results In a prospective derivation cohort (n=1848), 6 items identified by logistic regression (thoracic aortic aneurysm, severe pain, sudden pain, pulse deficit, neurologic deficit, hypotension), composed a simplified score (AORTAs) assigning 2 points to hypotension and 1 to the other items. AORTAs≤1 and ≥2 defined low and high clinical probability, respectively. Age-adjusted DD was calculated as years/age × 10 ng/mL (minimum 500). The AORTAs score and AORTAs≤1/age-adjusted DD rule were validated in 2 patient cohorts: a high-prevalence retrospective cohort (n=1035; 22% AASs) and a low-prevalence prospective cohort (n=447; 11% AASs) subjected to 30-day follow-up. The AUC of the AORTAs score was 0.729 versus 0.697 of the aortic dissection detection score (=0.005). AORTAs score assessment reclassified 16.6% to 25.1% of patients, with significant net reclassification improvement of 10.3% to 32.7% for AASs and -8.6 to -17% for alternative diagnoses. In both cohorts, AORTAs≥2 had superior sensitivity and slightly lower specificity than aortic dissection detection ≥2. In the prospective validation cohort, AORTAs≤1/age-adjusted DD had a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 48.6%, and an efficiency of 43.3%. Conclusions AORTAs is a simplified score with increased sensitivity, improved AAS classification, and minor trade-off in specificity, amenable to integration with age-adjusted DD for diagnostic rule-out.

摘要

背景

当怀疑急性主动脉综合征(AAS)时,术前临床概率评估和 D-二聚体(DD)检测是允许标准化治疗的诊断选择。指南建议使用 12 项/3 类评分(主动脉夹层检测)和 500ng/mL 的 DD 截断值。然而,简化评估工具和更特异的 DD 截断值可能更有利。

方法和结果

在一项前瞻性推导队列(n=1848)中,逻辑回归确定了 6 项指标(胸主动脉瘤、剧烈疼痛、突发疼痛、脉搏缺失、神经功能缺损、低血压),组成了一个简化评分(AORTAs),将低血压赋值为 2 分,其他项目赋值为 1 分。AORTAs≤1 和≥2 分别定义为低和高临床概率。年龄调整后的 DD 计算为年/年龄×10ng/mL(最小 500ng/mL)。AORTAs 评分和 AORTAs≤1/年龄调整的 DD 规则在 2 个患者队列中得到验证:一个高患病率回顾性队列(n=1035;22%的 AAS)和一个低患病率前瞻性队列(n=447;11%的 AAS)进行了 30 天随访。AORTAs 评分的 AUC 为 0.729,优于主动脉夹层检测评分的 0.697(=0.005)。AORTAs 评分评估重新分类了 16.6%至 25.1%的患者,AAS 的净重新分类改善为 10.3%至 32.7%,而其他诊断的净重新分类改善为-8.6%至-17%。在两个队列中,AORTAs≥2 的敏感性均高于主动脉夹层检测≥2,特异性略低。在前瞻性验证队列中,AORTAs≤1/年龄调整的 DD 的敏感性为 100%,特异性为 48.6%,效率为 43.3%。

结论

AORTAs 是一种简化评分,具有更高的敏感性、改善的 AAS 分类,特异性略有降低,适用于与年龄调整的 DD 结合进行诊断排除。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b551/7955418/6bf429c8025f/JAH3-10-e018425-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验