Gesualdo Loreto, Fiorentino Marco, Conserva Francesca, Pontrelli Paola
Renal, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DIMEPRE-J), University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Clin Kidney J. 2023 Oct 26;17(1):sfad266. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfad266. eCollection 2024 Jan.
Diabetic nephropathy (DN) and non-diabetic renal diseases (NDRD) represent intricate challenges in diagnosis and treatment within the context of the global diabetes epidemic. As the prevalence of diabetes continues to escalate, effective management of renal complications becomes paramount. Recent advancements in comprehending the multifaceted nature of renal damage, fueled by insights from histopathological investigations, offer unprecedented prospects for refining diagnostic strategies and customizing therapeutic interventions. Renal biopsies have emerged as indispensable tools for unraveling the diverse phenotypes of renal damage in diabetes. The pioneering study by Mazzucco identified three classes of renal damage in type 2 diabetes patients: classical diabetic glomerulosclerosis (DN), vascular and ischemic glomerular changes (NDRD), and other glomerulonephritides in the presence (DN + NDRD, mixed forms) or absence of DN (NDRD). The prevalence of these classes varies widely in published studies, influenced by factors such as ethnicity, geography and selection criteria for renal biopsy. Moreover, the international Renal Pathology Society consensus classification system has stratified the classical diabetic nephropathy into progressive categories of renal impairment, a breakthrough that aids in prognostication. Histopathological scrutiny, particularly the intricate correlation between glomerular and tubulointerstitial lesions, contributes profoundly to enhancing our grasp of the phenotype's heterogeneity. This amplified comprehension holds the potential to steer personalized treatment strategies. Cutting-edge interventions, encompassing sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and anti-endothelin receptor agents, are broadening the arsenal against renal injury in diabetes. When combined with the profound insights garnered from histopathological, omics, imaging and clinical data, these therapeutic avenues promise a transformative shift towards precision-driven care paradigms. Collaborative efforts uniting researchers, clinicians and patients are indispensable for propelling our knowledge of diabetic renal damage and ameliorating patient outcomes. The fusion of histopathological, omics and imaging findings into clinical decision-making harbors the potential to customize interventions and optimize care for individuals grappling with diabetes-associated renal complications. Furthermore, groundbreaking initiatives like the iBeat Study within the BEAt-DKD (Biomarker Enterprise to Attack Diabetic Kidney Disease) project (https://www.beat-dkd.eu/), elucidating distinct phenotypes of renal damage within diabetes, underscore the imperative necessity of integrating histopathological data into the broader framework of diabetic renal management.
在全球糖尿病流行的背景下,糖尿病肾病(DN)和非糖尿病性肾脏疾病(NDRD)在诊断和治疗方面构成了复杂的挑战。随着糖尿病患病率持续上升,有效管理肾脏并发症变得至关重要。近年来,受组织病理学研究见解的推动,人们对肾脏损伤多方面性质的理解取得了进展,为改进诊断策略和定制治疗干预措施提供了前所未有的前景。肾活检已成为揭示糖尿病患者肾脏损伤不同表型的不可或缺的工具。马祖科的开创性研究确定了2型糖尿病患者的三类肾脏损伤:经典糖尿病肾小球硬化症(DN)、血管和缺血性肾小球改变(NDRD),以及存在(DN + NDRD,混合形式)或不存在DN(NDRD)时的其他肾小球肾炎。在已发表的研究中,这些类型的患病率差异很大,受种族、地理位置和肾活检选择标准等因素影响。此外,国际肾脏病理学会共识分类系统已将经典糖尿病肾病分为肾脏损害的进展类别,这一突破有助于预后判断。组织病理学检查,特别是肾小球和肾小管间质病变之间的复杂关联,对于增强我们对表型异质性的理解有很大帮助。这种加深的理解有可能指导个性化治疗策略。前沿干预措施,包括钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂、盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂和抗内皮素受体药物,正在扩大对抗糖尿病肾脏损伤的手段。当与从组织病理学、组学、影像学和临床数据中获得的深刻见解相结合时,这些治疗途径有望朝着精准驱动的护理模式实现变革性转变。研究人员、临床医生和患者的合作努力对于推动我们对糖尿病肾脏损伤的认识和改善患者预后不可或缺。将组织病理学、组学和影像学结果融入临床决策有可能为应对糖尿病相关肾脏并发症的个体定制干预措施并优化护理。此外,BEAt-DKD(攻击糖尿病肾病生物标志物企业)项目(https://www.beat-dkd.eu/)中的iBeat研究等开创性举措,阐明了糖尿病患者肾脏损伤的不同表型,强调了将组织病理学数据纳入糖尿病肾脏管理更广泛框架的迫切必要性。