Liu Zhan-Xiao, Yang Ya, Song Huan-Huan, Liu Wei, Sun Peng, Lin Cai-Wei
Department of Emergency Medicine, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, 100049, China.
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 10;10(1):e23411. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23411. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
In this paper, we present a comprehensive overview of our experience in establishing and leading distinct extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR)-related teams to independently handle ECPR in the early stages in the emergency department.
A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 29 patients who underwent ECPR treatment in the emergency room between May 2018 and April 2022. A control group, consisting of 10 patients treated between May 2018 and September 2019 was managed using a standard rescue coordination mode. The 19 patients who received ECPR between October 2019 and April 2022 were treated by members of the department's 24-h extracorporeal life support team. We compared the implementation and operational challenges faced by the two groups, including item preparation, circuit setup, and ECPR initiation times, among other factors.
Gender, age, cardiac arrest risk factors, and other baseline data did not significantly differ between the two groups. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) pipeline prefilling time (from 35.27±10.34 to 13.46±5.32), ECPR establishment time (from 62.35±29.61 to 30.98±13.41), and item preparation time (from 16.42±9.78 to 3.19±1.49) all considerably decreased when compared to the control group. The rate of return of spontaneous circulation recovery rose from 37.50 % to 77.78 % (P < 0.05). The consequences of gastrointestinal and pulmonary bleeding were greatly reduced while ECPR was being used, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Significant improvements were made in the ECPR weaning rate (from 25.00 % to 38.89 %) and survival rate (from 20.0 % to 36.8 %).
The establishment of a 24-h extracorporeal life support team significantly reduced the time needed for rescue during the early stage of independent setup of ECPR in the emergency department and serves as a guide for effective care of critically ill patients.
在本文中,我们全面概述了我们在组建和领导不同的体外心肺复苏(ECPR)相关团队以在急诊科早期独立处理ECPR方面的经验。
对2018年5月至2022年4月期间在急诊室接受ECPR治疗的29例患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。对照组由2018年5月至2019年9月期间治疗的10例患者组成,采用标准的救援协调模式进行管理。2019年10月至2022年4月期间接受ECPR的19例患者由该部门的24小时体外生命支持团队成员进行治疗。我们比较了两组面临的实施和操作挑战,包括物品准备、回路设置和ECPR启动时间等因素。
两组在性别、年龄、心脏骤停危险因素和其他基线数据方面无显著差异。与对照组相比,体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)管道预充时间(从35.27±10.34降至13.46±5.32)、ECPR建立时间(从62.35±29.61降至30.98±13.41)和物品准备时间(从16.42±9.78降至3.19±1.49)均显著缩短。自主循环恢复率从37.50%升至77.78%(P<0.05)。在使用ECPR期间,胃肠道和肺部出血的后果大大减少,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。ECPR撤机率(从25.00%升至38.89%)和生存率(从20.0%升至36.8%)有显著提高。
建立24小时体外生命支持团队显著减少了急诊科独立设置ECPR早期阶段的救援所需时间,并为危重症患者的有效护理提供了指导。