Suppr超能文献

确定当前基于模拟的医疗保健教育质量评估方法:一项范围综述

Determining current approaches to the evaluation of the quality of healthcare simulation-based education provision: a scoping review.

作者信息

Pogson Rachel, Henderson Helen, Holland Matt, Sumera Agnieszka, Sumera Kacper, Webster Carl A

机构信息

School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, England, ST5 5BG, UK.

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedic Practice, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland, AB10 7QE, UK.

出版信息

MedEdPublish (2016). 2023 Oct 5;13:207. doi: 10.12688/mep.19758.1. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

With an increase in simulation being used in healthcare education, there is a need to ensure the quality of simulation-based education is high. This scoping review was conducted to answer the question: What are the current approaches to the evaluation of the quality of health-care simulation-based education provision? Databases PubMed, Cochrane, ERIC, CINAHL and Medline were searched in March 2023 to retrieve peer-reviewed healthcare research and review articles written in the English language within the last 20 years. All data were extracted from six studies, themed and presented in the main text and in tabular form. Two scoping reviews, one systematic review and three research articles were included. Three main themes were found: adherence to existing design frameworks, lack of validation of these frameworks and lack of evaluation frameworks, and a proposed evaluation framework. Many of the excluded articles focussed on gaining participant feedback to evaluate simulation activities, rather than evaluating the quality of the design and implementation of the simulation. Benchmarking of current United Kingdom (UK) healthcare simulation against UK and international simulation standards is required to increase its quality, therefore, an agreed UK template framework to evaluate simulation packages is recommended.

摘要

随着模拟在医疗保健教育中的应用不断增加,有必要确保基于模拟的教育质量很高。开展这项范围综述是为了回答以下问题:当前评估医疗保健模拟教育提供质量的方法有哪些?2023年3月检索了数据库PubMed、Cochrane、ERIC、CINAHL和Medline,以获取过去20年内以英文撰写的同行评审医疗保健研究和综述文章。所有数据均从六项研究中提取,按主题在正文和表格中呈现。纳入了两项范围综述、一项系统综述和三篇研究文章。发现了三个主要主题:对现有设计框架的遵循、这些框架缺乏验证以及缺乏评估框架,以及一个提议的评估框架。许多被排除的文章侧重于获取参与者反馈以评估模拟活动,而不是评估模拟的设计和实施质量。因此,需要将英国当前的医疗保健模拟与英国和国际模拟标准进行对标,以提高其质量,建议制定一个商定的英国模板框架来评估模拟包。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d305/10767249/63c551e6551c/mep-13-21172-g0000.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验