Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, Monash University, Notting Hill, Victoria, Australia.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2020 Apr;52(4):429-438. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2019.06.015. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
Simulation-based learning experiences (SBLEs) are widely used in education for health professionals, but this literature has not yet been synthesized for dietetics. The aim of this study was to describe presupervised practice SBLEs using simulated patients within programs credentialing dietitians.
A systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A total of 8 databases were searched (MEDLINE by EBSCO HOST, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Scopus, ERIC ProQuest, Embase, and ProQuest Education) for studies published up to November 2, 2018 with the terms "dietitian," "standardized patient," "student," and their synonyms.
Fourteen out of 740 studies were identified. Most focused on development/assessment of communication and counseling skills. Learning outcomes were measured in 12 studies with 8 different tools.
The dietetics profession needs robust and consistent reporting methods to enable the development of a high-quality body of evidence on SBLEs. The quality and quantity of SBLE research need to improve to ensure that simulations are pedagogically sound and are accompanied by measures of quality and impact on learning.
基于模拟的学习体验(SBLEs)在卫生专业人员的教育中被广泛应用,但目前尚未对 SBLEs 在营养学中的应用进行综合研究。本研究旨在描述在为营养师提供认证的项目中使用模拟患者进行预监督实践 SBLEs。
按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南进行系统综述。共搜索了 8 个数据库(EBSCO HOST 中的 MEDLINE、全文 CINAHL Plus、Web of Science、PsycINFO、Scopus、ProQuest ERIC、Embase 和 ProQuest Education),检索截至 2018 年 11 月 2 日的研究,使用的术语包括“营养师”、“标准化患者”、“学生”及其同义词。
从 740 项研究中确定了 14 项。大多数研究都集中在沟通和咨询技巧的开发/评估上。12 项研究使用 8 种不同的工具测量了学习成果。
营养学专业需要采用稳健和一致的报告方法,以开发高质量的 SBLE 证据。需要提高 SBLE 研究的质量和数量,以确保模拟具有良好的教学效果,并伴有对质量和学习效果的衡量。