Suppr超能文献

对于住院肝硬化病例的风险调整,医院衰弱风险评分优于传统的合并症指数。

Hospital frailty risk score is superior to legacy comorbidity indices for risk adjustment of in-hospital cirrhosis cases.

作者信息

Desai Archita P, Parvataneni Swetha, Knapp Shannon M, Nephew Lauren D, Chalasani Naga, Ghabril Marwan S, Orman Eric S

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

出版信息

JHEP Rep. 2023 Nov 3;6(1):100955. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100955. eCollection 2024 Jan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The hospital frailty risk score (HFRS) identifies older patients at risk of poor outcomes and may have value in cirrhosis. We compared the Charlson (CCI), Elixhauser (ECI), and cirrhosis (CirCom) comorbidity indices with the HFRS in predicting outcomes for cirrhosis hospitalisations.

METHODS

Using the National Inpatient Sample (quarter 4 of 2015-2019), we analysed cirrhosis hospitalisations. For each index, we described the prevalence of comorbid conditions and inpatient mortality. We compared the ability of CCI, ECI, CirCom, and HFRS to predict inpatient mortality. Raw and adjusted models predicting inpatient mortality were compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the Akaike information criterion.

RESULTS

The cohort's (N = 626,553) median age was 61 years (IQR 52-68 years), 60% were male, cirrhosis was caused by alcohol in 43%, and 38% had ascites. The median comorbidity scores are as follows: ECI 4 (IQR 3-6), CCI 5 (IQR 4-8), and HFRS 5.6 (IQR 3.0-8.6). The most common CirCom score was 0 + 0 (44%). Across the range of values of each index, we observed different mortality ranges: CCI 1.9-13.1%, ECI 3.2-8.7%, CirCom 4.9-13.8%, and HFRS 1.0-15.2%. An adjusted model with HFRS had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in predicting mortality (HFRS 0.782 . ECI 0.689, CCI 0.695, and CirCom 0.692). We observed substantial variation in mortality with HFRS within each level of CCI, ECI, and CirCom. For example, for ECI 4, mortality increased from 0.6 to 16.4%, as HFRS increased from 0 to 15.

CONCLUSIONS

Comorbidity indices predict inpatient cirrhosis mortality, but HFRS performs better than CCI, ECI, and CirCom. HFRS is an ideal tool for measuring comorbidity burden and disease severity risk adjustment in cirrhosis-related administrative database studies.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

We compared commonly used comorbidity indices to a more recently described risk score (hospital frailty risk score [HFRS]) in patients with cirrhosis using a national sample of hospital records. Comorbid conditions are common in hospitalised patients with cirrhosis. There is significant variability in mortality across the range of each index. HFRS outperforms the Charlson comorbidity index, Elixhauser comorbidity index, and CirCom (cirrhosis-specific comorbidity scoring system) in predicting inpatient mortality. HFRS is a valuable index for risk adjustment in inpatient administrative database studies.

摘要

背景与目的

医院虚弱风险评分(HFRS)可识别预后不良风险较高的老年患者,在肝硬化患者中可能具有一定价值。我们比较了查尔森(CCI)、埃利克斯豪泽(ECI)和肝硬化(CirCom)合并症指数与HFRS在预测肝硬化住院患者预后方面的表现。

方法

利用国家住院患者样本(2015 - 2019年第4季度),我们对肝硬化住院患者进行了分析。对于每个指数,我们描述了合并症的患病率和住院死亡率。我们比较了CCI、ECI、CirCom和HFRS预测住院死亡率的能力。使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积和赤池信息准则对预测住院死亡率的原始模型和校正模型进行比较。

结果

该队列(N = 626,553)的中位年龄为61岁(四分位间距52 - 68岁),60%为男性,43%的肝硬化由酒精引起,38%有腹水。合并症评分中位数如下:ECI为4(四分位间距3 - 6),CCI为5(四分位间距4 - 8),HFRS为5.6(四分位间距3.0 - 8.6)。最常见的CirCom评分为0 + 0(44%)。在每个指数的取值范围内,我们观察到不同的死亡率范围:CCI为1.9 - 13.1%,ECI为3.2 - 8.7%,CirCom为4.9 - 13.8%,HFRS为1.0 - 15.2%。在预测死亡率方面,校正后的HFRS模型在受试者工作特征曲线下面积最大(HFRS为0.782,ECI为0.689,CCI为0.695,CirCom为0.692)。在CCI、ECI和CirCom的每个水平内,我们观察到HFRS的死亡率存在显著差异。例如,对于ECI为4的情况,随着HFRS从0增加到15,死亡率从0.6%增加到16.4%。

结论

合并症指数可预测肝硬化患者的住院死亡率,但HFRS的表现优于CCI、ECI和CirCom。在与肝硬化相关的行政数据库研究中,HFRS是衡量合并症负担和疾病严重程度风险调整的理想工具。

影响与意义

我们使用全国医院记录样本,将常用的合并症指数与最近描述的一种风险评分(医院虚弱风险评分[HFRS])在肝硬化患者中进行了比较。合并症在肝硬化住院患者中很常见。在每个指数的取值范围内,死亡率存在显著差异。在预测住院死亡率方面,HFRS优于查尔森合并症指数、埃利克斯豪泽合并症指数和CirCom(肝硬化特异性合并症评分系统)。HFRS是住院行政数据库研究中进行风险调整的有价值指数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cb3/10772247/7187519ea0b9/ga1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验