Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Palliat Med. 2024 May;27(5):630-637. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0521. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
Patients with serious illnesses have unmet symptom and psychosocial needs. Specialty palliative care could address many of these needs; however, access varies by geography and health system. Virtual visits and automated referrals could increase access and lead to improved quality of life, health outcomes, and patient-centered care for patients with serious illness. We sought to understand referring clinician perspectives on barriers and facilitators to utilizing virtual tools to increase upstream access to palliative care. Participants in this multisite qualitative study included practicing clinicians who commonly place palliative care referrals across multiple specialties, including hematology/oncology, family medicine, cardiology, and geriatrics. All interviews were transcribed and subsequently coded and analyzed by trained research coordinators using Atlas.ti software. This study included 23 clinicians (21 physicians, 2 nonphysicians) across 5 specialties, 4 practice settings, and 7 states in the United States. Respondents felt that community-based specialty palliative services including symptom management, advance care planning, physical therapy, and mental health counseling would benefit their patients. However, they had mixed feelings about automated referrals, with some clinicians feeling hesitant about not being alerted to such referrals. Many respondents were supportive of virtual palliative care, particularly for those who may have difficulty accessing physician offices, but most respondents felt that such care should only be provided after an initial in-person consultation where clinicians can meet face-to-face with patients. Clinicians believe that automated referrals and virtual palliative care could increase access to the benefits of specialty palliative care. However, virtual palliative care models should give attention to iterative communication with primary clinicians and the perceived need for an initial in-person visit.
患有严重疾病的患者存在未满足的症状和心理社会需求。专科姑息治疗可以满足这些需求中的许多需求;然而,这种治疗的可及性因地理位置和医疗体系而异。虚拟就诊和自动化转诊可以增加获得姑息治疗的机会,并提高严重疾病患者的生活质量、健康结果和以患者为中心的护理。我们旨在了解临床医生在利用虚拟工具增加姑息治疗的上游可及性方面面临的障碍和促进因素的看法。本多地点定性研究的参与者包括经常在多个专业领域(包括血液科/肿瘤科、家庭医学、心脏病学和老年病学)进行姑息治疗转诊的执业临床医生。所有访谈均进行了转录,随后由经过培训的研究协调员使用 Atlas.ti 软件进行编码和分析。本研究包括 5 个州的 4 个实践场所的 23 名临床医生(21 名医生,2 名非医生),涉及 5 个专业。受访者认为包括症状管理、预先护理计划、物理治疗和心理健康咨询在内的基于社区的专科姑息服务将使他们的患者受益。然而,他们对自动化转诊的看法不一,一些临床医生对不会收到此类转诊的通知感到犹豫不决。许多受访者支持虚拟姑息治疗,特别是对于那些可能难以前往医生办公室的患者,但大多数受访者认为,只有在临床医生能够与患者面对面交流的初步面对面咨询后,才应提供此类护理。临床医生认为,自动化转诊和虚拟姑息治疗可以增加获得专科姑息治疗益处的机会。然而,虚拟姑息治疗模式应注意与初级临床医生进行迭代沟通,并考虑到对初始面对面就诊的需求。