Okoffo Elvis D, Tscharke Ben J, Li Jiaying, Thomas Kevin V
Queensland Alliance for Environmental Health Sciences (QAEHS), The University of Queensland, 20 Cornwall Street, Woolloongabba, Queensland 4102, Australia.
Queensland Alliance for Environmental Health Sciences (QAEHS), The University of Queensland, 20 Cornwall Street, Woolloongabba, Queensland 4102, Australia.
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Mar 1;914:169737. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169737. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
Plastics are ubiquitous in virtually every environment on earth. While the specific sources of plastics entering wastewater are not well known, growing evidence suggests sewage sludge (biosolids) can be a sink for plastics. One potential source could be the sewerage pipe materials used to transport sewage between premises and wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). To evaluate the significance of sewerage piping as a source of biosolids plastics concentrations, we compared the proportion of the total network (by length and surface area) of polyethylene (PE), polyvinylchloride (PVC), and polypropylene (PP) pipes from 10 WWTPs against their biosolids mass concentrations (mg plastic/g biosolid). Among the 10 catchments, the percentage of the network consisting of PP piping ranged from 0 to 1 %, with 0.8-21 % for PE, and 8-73 % for PVC. Biosolids plastics concentrations ranged from 0.09 to 8.62 mg/g (mg plastic/g biosolid) for PP and PE, respectively. For all three plastics, there was no significant Pearson correlation (r < 0.4) between the biosolids concentration (dry weight mg/g) and the proportion of the network material of the sewerage piping as plastic (either length or surface area). A comparison of trade waste entering a subset of 6 WWTP showed the highest biosolid principal components analysis (PCA) associations between loads of plastics (g/day) and automotive wash bays, general manufacturing, hospitals, laboratories, food manufacturing, laundry and dry cleaning, and cooling towers. A stepwise regression analysis indicated pipe length and surface area, as well as automotive wash bays and food manufacturing may be significant. While our data gave mixed results on the attribution of the sources of plastics entering WWTPs, it suggests that sewerage infrastructure and trade waste may play some role. Future studies should investigate the leachability of sewerage infrastructure and contributions from specific trade waste categories to determine their significance in plastics entering WWTPs.
塑料在地球上几乎每一个环境中都无处不在。虽然进入废水的塑料的具体来源尚不清楚,但越来越多的证据表明,污水污泥(生物固体)可能是塑料的一个储存库。一个潜在来源可能是用于在建筑物和污水处理厂(WWTPs)之间输送污水的污水管道材料。为了评估污水管道作为生物固体中塑料浓度来源的重要性,我们比较了来自10个污水处理厂的聚乙烯(PE)、聚氯乙烯(PVC)和聚丙烯(PP)管道在整个管网中的比例(按长度和表面积计算)与其生物固体质量浓度(毫克塑料/克生物固体)。在这10个集水区中,由PP管道组成的管网百分比范围为0至1%,PE为0.8至21%,PVC为8至73%。PP和PE的生物固体塑料浓度分别为0.09至8.62毫克/克(毫克塑料/克生物固体)。对于所有这三种塑料,生物固体浓度(干重毫克/克)与作为塑料的污水管道网络材料比例(长度或表面积)之间均无显著的皮尔逊相关性(r < 0.4)。对进入6个污水处理厂子集的商业废物的比较显示,在塑料负荷(克/天)与汽车清洗场、一般制造业、医院、实验室、食品制造业、洗衣和干洗以及冷却塔之间,生物固体主成分分析(PCA)关联度最高。逐步回归分析表明,管道长度和表面积以及汽车清洗场和食品制造业可能具有重要意义。虽然我们的数据在进入污水处理厂的塑料来源归因方面给出了混合结果,但这表明污水基础设施和商业废物可能起到了一定作用。未来的研究应调查污水基础设施的可沥滤性以及特定商业废物类别的贡献,以确定它们在塑料进入污水处理厂中的重要性。