Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Kobenhavn, Denmark
Nordic Bioscience, Herlev, Denmark.
RMD Open. 2024 Jan 10;10(1):e003769. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003769.
To explore the potential of a panel of ECM remodelling markers as endotyping tools for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) by separating patients into subtypes and investigate how they differ among each other in disease activity scores and response to treatment with adalimumab.
In three axSpA studies, a panel of 14 blood-based ECM biomarkers related to formation of collagen (PRO-C2, PRO-C3, PRO-C6), degradation of collagen by metalloproteinases (C1M, C2M, T2CM, C3M, C4M, C6M, C10C), matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-degraded prolargin (PROM), MMP-degraded and citrullinated vimentin (VICM), basement membrane turnover (PRO-C4) and neutrophil activity (CPa9-HNE) were assessed to enable patient clustering (endotyping). MASH (n=41) was a cross-sectional study, while Adalimumab in Axial Spondyloarthritis study (ASIM,n=45) and Danish Multicenter Study of Adalimumab in Spondyloarthritis (DANISH, n=49) were randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trials of adalimumab versus placebo every other week for 6 or 12 weeks, respectively, followed by active treatment. Biomarker data were log-transformed, standardised by mean centering and scaled by the SD prior to principal component analysis and K-means clustering.
Based on all three studies, we identified two orthogonal dimensions reflecting: (1) inflammation and neutrophil activity (driven by C1M and CPa9-HNE) and (2) collagen turnover (driven by PRO-C2). Three endotypes were identified: high inflammation endotype (Endotype1), low inflammation endotype (Endotype 2) and high collagen turnover endotype (Endotype3). Endotype1 showed higher disease activity (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)) at baseline compared with Endotype2 and Endotype3 and higher percentage of patients responding to adalimumab based on ASDAS clinical improvement at week 24. Endotype3 showed higher percentage of patients with 50% improvement in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index response at week 24 compared with Endotype2.
These endotypes differ in their tissue remodelling profile and may in the future have utility for patient stratification and treatment tailoring.
通过将患者分为亚型,探索一组细胞外基质重塑标志物作为轴性脊柱关节炎(axSpA)表型工具的潜力,并研究它们在疾病活动评分和对阿达木单抗治疗的反应方面彼此之间的差异。
在三项 axSpA 研究中,评估了一组 14 种与胶原蛋白形成相关的血液细胞外基质生物标志物(PRO-C2、PRO-C3、PRO-C6)、金属蛋白酶降解的胶原蛋白(C1M、C2M、T2CM、C3M、C4M、C6M、C10C)、基质金属蛋白酶降解的前脯氨酸(PROM)、基质金属蛋白酶降解和瓜氨酸化波形蛋白(VICM)、基底膜转换(PRO-C4)和中性粒细胞活性(CPa9-HNE),以实现患者聚类(表型)。MASH(n=41)为横断面研究,而阿达木单抗治疗 axSpA 研究(ASIM,n=45)和丹麦阿达木单抗治疗脊柱关节炎多中心研究(DANISH,n=49)为随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,分别每两周接受阿达木单抗或安慰剂治疗 6 或 12 周,随后进行活性治疗。在进行主成分分析和 K 均值聚类之前,对生物标志物数据进行对数转换、均值中心化标准化和 SD 缩放。
基于所有三项研究,我们确定了两个正交维度,反映了:(1)炎症和中性粒细胞活性(由 C1M 和 CPa9-HNE 驱动)和(2)胶原蛋白转化(由 PRO-C2 驱动)。确定了三种表型:高炎症表型(表型 1)、低炎症表型(表型 2)和高胶原蛋白转化表型(表型 3)。表型 1 与表型 2 和表型 3 相比,基线时疾病活动度(强直性脊柱炎疾病活动评分(ASDAS))更高,基于第 24 周 ASDAS 临床改善的阿达木单抗应答的患者比例更高。与表型 2 相比,表型 3 在第 24 周时,有更多患者达到 Bath 强直性脊柱炎疾病活动指数应答 50%改善。
这些表型在组织重塑特征上存在差异,未来可能对患者分层和治疗定制具有实用价值。