School of Business Administration, Université TÉLUQ, Montreal, Canada.
Department of School and Social Adaptation Studies, Faculty of Education, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Jan 10;22(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01090-7.
BACKGROUND: Evaluating knowledge mobilization strategies (KMb) presents challenges for organizations seeking to understand their impact to improve KMb effectiveness. Moreover, the large number of theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs) available can be confusing for users. Therefore, the purpose of this scoping review was to identify and describe the characteristics of TMFs that have been used or proposed in the literature to evaluate KMb strategies. METHODS: A scoping review methodology was used. Articles were identified through searches in electronic databases, previous reviews and reference lists of included articles. Titles, abstracts and full texts were screened in duplicate. Data were charted using a piloted data charting form. Data extracted included study characteristics, KMb characteristics, and TMFs used or proposed for KMb evaluation. An adapted version of Nilsen (Implement Sci 10:53, 2015) taxonomy and the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) taxonomy (Powell et al. in Implement Sci 10:21, 2015) guided data synthesis. RESULTS: Of the 4763 search results, 505 were retrieved, and 88 articles were eligible for review. These consisted of 40 theoretical articles (45.5%), 44 empirical studies (50.0%) and four protocols (4.5%). The majority were published after 2010 (n = 70, 79.5%) and were health related (n = 71, 80.7%). Half of the studied KMb strategies were implemented in only four countries: Canada, Australia, the United States and the United Kingdom (n = 42, 47.7%). One-third used existing TMFs (n = 28, 31.8%). According to the adapted Nilsen taxonomy, process models (n = 34, 38.6%) and evaluation frameworks (n = 28, 31.8%) were the two most frequent types of TMFs used or proposed to evaluate KMb. According to the ERIC taxonomy, activities to "train and educate stakeholders" (n = 46, 52.3%) were the most common, followed by activities to "develop stakeholder interrelationships" (n = 23, 26.1%). Analysis of the TMFs identified revealed relevant factors of interest for the evaluation of KMb strategies, classified into four dimensions: context, process, effects and impacts. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review provides an overview of the many KMb TMFs used or proposed. The results provide insight into potential dimensions and components to be considered when assessing KMb strategies.
背景：评估知识转化策略（KMb）对于寻求了解其影响以提高 KMb 效果的组织来说具有挑战性。此外，大量可用的理论、模型和框架（TMFs）可能会让用户感到困惑。因此，本范围审查的目的是确定和描述文献中用于评估 KMb 策略的 TMFs 的特征。
方法：采用范围审查方法。通过在电子数据库、以前的综述和纳入文章的参考文献列表中进行搜索，确定了文章。标题、摘要和全文进行了双重筛选。使用试点数据图表表格记录数据。提取的数据包括研究特征、KMb 特征以及用于或提出的 KMb 评估 TMFs。改编的 Nilsen（实施科学 10:53, 2015）分类法和专家推荐实施变革（ERIC）分类法（Powell 等人，实施科学 10:21, 2015）指导数据综合。
结果：在 4763 条搜索结果中，有 505 条被检索到，有 88 篇文章符合审查条件。这些文章包括 40 篇理论文章（45.5%）、44 篇实证研究（50.0%）和 4 篇方案（4.5%）。大多数文章发表于 2010 年之后（n=70，79.5%），与健康相关（n=71，80.7%）。一半的研究 KMb 策略仅在四个国家实施：加拿大、澳大利亚、美国和英国（n=42，47.7%）。三分之一使用了现有的 TMFs（n=28，31.8%）。根据改编的 Nilsen 分类法，过程模型（n=34，38.6%）和评估框架（n=28，31.8%）是用于或提出评估 KMb 的两种最常见的 TMF 类型。根据 ERIC 分类法，“培训和教育利益相关者”的活动（n=46，52.3%）是最常见的，其次是“发展利益相关者相互关系”的活动（n=23，26.1%）。对 TMFs 的分析结果揭示了评估 KMb 策略的相关感兴趣因素，分为四个维度：背景、过程、效果和影响。
结论：本范围审查提供了用于或提出的许多 KMb TMFs 的概述。结果提供了评估 KMb 策略时需要考虑的潜在维度和组件的见解。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024-1-10
Implement Sci. 2020-2-14
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1
J Med Internet Res. 2024-2-5
Res Involv Engagem. 2025-3-12
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025-4-4
Implement Sci Commun. 2023-5-16
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022
Implement Sci Commun. 2022-3-28
Implement Sci. 2022-1-4
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021-8
Am J Ind Med. 2021-1
Eval Program Plann. 2020-12
Zotero 插件