Suppr超能文献

评估知识获取和利用相关工具的研究:范围综述。

Examination of tools associated with the evaluation of knowledge uptake and utilization: A scoping review.

机构信息

School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Eval Program Plann. 2020 Dec;83:101875. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101875. Epub 2020 Sep 23.

Abstract

Knowledge transfer and exchange (KTE) has become an integral part of organizational practice. Evaluation of KTE, as well as knowledge products generated through this process, is important for understanding the effectiveness of KTE strategies. This scoping review aimed to identify tools and frameworks used to evaluate knowledge uptake and utilization (KUU). The search strategy included review of PubMed and Scopus databases, hand searching of relevant journals, and citation tracing. Over 6500 abstracts were screened; 292 full-text articles were shortlisted by two reviewers. Seventy-two articles described tools for evaluating KUU. A total of 23 tools could be generally applied to knowledge products/processes used in different sectors; 36 evaluation tools were designed for specific knowledge products (i.e., websites); 9 tools were discipline-specific (i.e., medical field), and four articles described evaluations of knowledge products/processes using alternative methods such as Google Analytics or qualitative methods. The majority of tools (n = 40, 56 %) focused on usability of a knowledge product or process. This scoping review identified various tools being used to assess the effectiveness and impact of KTE processes/products, however, the measures were as varied as the projects, and were often not designed to evaluate KTE in particular.

摘要

知识转移和交流(KTE)已成为组织实践的一个组成部分。评估 KTE 以及通过该过程产生的知识产品对于了解 KTE 策略的有效性非常重要。本范围审查旨在确定用于评估知识获取和利用(KUU)的工具和框架。搜索策略包括审查 PubMed 和 Scopus 数据库、手动搜索相关期刊和引文追踪。筛选了超过 6500 个摘要;两名审查员筛选了 292 篇全文文章。72 篇文章描述了评估 KUU 的工具。共有 23 种工具可广泛应用于不同领域使用的知识产品/流程;36 种评估工具专为特定的知识产品(即网站)设计;9 种工具是特定于学科的(即医学领域),还有四篇文章描述了使用 Google Analytics 或定性方法等替代方法对知识产品/流程进行评估。大多数工具(n=40,56%)侧重于知识产品或流程的可用性。本范围审查确定了各种用于评估 KTE 过程/产品的有效性和影响的工具,但是这些措施与项目一样多种多样,而且通常不是专门用于评估 KTE 的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验