Habermann Felix-Nikolai Oschinka Jegor, Schmitt Daniela, Failing Thomas, Ziegler David Alexander, Fischer Jann, Fischer Laura Anna, Guhlich Manuel, Bendrich Stephanie, Knaus Olga, Overbeck Tobias Raphael, Treiber Hannes, von Hammerstein-Equord Alexander, Koch Raphael, El Shafie Rami, Rieken Stefan, Leu Martin, Dröge Leif Hendrik
Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
Göttingen Comprehensive Cancer Center (G-CCC), University Medical Center Göttingen, Von-Bar-Str. 2/4, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan 4;16(1):231. doi: 10.3390/cancers16010231.
The internal organ at risk volume (IRV) concept might improve toxicity profiles in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We studied (1) clinical aspects in central vs. peripheral tumors, (2) the IRV concept in central tumors, (3) organ motion, and (4) associated normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs). We analyzed patients who received SBRT for NSCLC (clinical aspects, = 78; motion management, = 35). We found lower biologically effective doses, larger planning target volume sizes, higher lung doses, and worse locoregional control for central vs. peripheral tumors. Organ motion was greater in males and tall patients (bronchial tree), whereas volume changes were lower in patients with a high body mass index (BMI) (esophagus). Applying the IRV concept (retrospectively, without new optimization), we found an absolute increase of >10% in NTCPs for the bronchial tree in three patients. This study emphasizes the need to optimize methods to balance dose escalation with toxicities in central tumors. There is evidence that organ motion/volume changes could be more pronounced in males and tall patients, and less pronounced in patients with higher BMI. Since recent studies have made efforts to further subclassify central tumors to refine treatment, the IRV concept should be considered for optimal risk assessment.
危及器官体积(IRV)概念可能会改善非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)的毒性特征。我们研究了(1)中央型肿瘤与周围型肿瘤的临床情况,(2)中央型肿瘤的IRV概念,(3)器官运动,以及(4)相关的正常组织并发症概率(NTCPs)。我们分析了接受NSCLC的SBRT治疗的患者(临床情况,n = 78;运动管理,n = 35)。我们发现,与周围型肿瘤相比,中央型肿瘤的生物等效剂量更低、计划靶体积更大、肺剂量更高且局部区域控制更差。男性和高个子患者(支气管树)的器官运动更大,而体重指数(BMI)高的患者(食管)的体积变化更小。应用IRV概念(回顾性分析,未进行新的优化),我们发现3例患者支气管树的NTCPs绝对增加>10%。本研究强调需要优化方法以平衡中央型肿瘤的剂量增加与毒性。有证据表明,男性和高个子患者的器官运动/体积变化可能更明显,而BMI较高的患者则不太明显。由于最近的研究已努力对中央型肿瘤进行进一步亚分类以优化治疗,因此应考虑使用IRV概念进行最佳风险评估。