• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助直肠癌侧方盆腔淋巴结清扫术:来自欧洲某中心的可行性研究

Robotic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Rectal Cancer: A Feasibility Study from a European Centre.

作者信息

Chang Tou Pin, Ali Oroog, Tsimogiannis Kostas, Sica Giuseppe S, Khan Jim S

机构信息

Epsom and St. Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, Carshalton SM5 1AA, UK.

Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust, Gateshead NE9 6SX, UK.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 23;13(1):90. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010090.

DOI:10.3390/jcm13010090
PMID:38202097
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10779823/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The role of robotic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) for lateral pelvic nodal disease (LPND) in rectal cancer has yet to be investigated in the Western hemisphere. This study aims to investigate the safety and feasibility of robotic LPLND by utilising a well-established totally robotic TME protocol.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on 17 consecutive patients who underwent robotic LPLND for LPND ± TME for rectal cancer between 2015 and 2021. A single docking totally robotic approach from the left hip with full splenic mobilisation was performed using the X/Xi da Vinci platform. All patients underwent a tri-compartmental robotic en bloc excision of LPND with preservation of the obturator nerve and pelvic nerve plexus, leaving a well-skeletonised internal iliac vessel and its branches.

RESULTS

The median operative time was 280 min, which was 40 min longer than our standard robotic TME. The median BMI was 26, and there were no conversions. The median inpatient stay was 7 days with no Clavien-Dindo > 3 complications. One patient (6%) developed local recurrence and metastatic disease within 5 months. The proportion of histologically confirmed LPND was 41%, of which 94% were well to moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. Median pre-operative lateral pelvic node size was significantly higher in positive nodes (14 mm vs. 8 mm ( = 0.01)). All patients had clear resection margins on histology.

DISCUSSION

Robotic LPLND is safe and feasible with good peri-operative and short-term outcomes, with the ergonomic advantages of a robotic TME docking protocol readily transferrable in LPLND.

摘要

引言

在西半球,机器人辅助下的侧方盆腔淋巴结清扫术(LPLND)在直肠癌侧方盆腔淋巴结疾病(LPND)中的作用尚未得到研究。本研究旨在通过采用成熟的全机器人直肠癌根治术(TME)方案,探讨机器人辅助LPLND的安全性和可行性。

方法

我们对2015年至2021年间连续17例因LPND±TME接受机器人辅助LPLND的直肠癌患者进行了回顾性研究。使用X/Xi达芬奇平台,从左髋部采用单对接全机器人方法,充分游离脾脏。所有患者均接受了LPND的三室机器人整块切除,保留闭孔神经和盆腔神经丛,使髂内血管及其分支呈现良好的骨骼化状态。

结果

中位手术时间为280分钟,比我们的标准机器人TME长40分钟。中位体重指数(BMI)为26,无中转开腹病例。中位住院时间为7天,无Clavien-Dindo>3级并发症。1例患者(6%)在5个月内出现局部复发和转移性疾病。组织学确诊为LPND的比例为41%,其中94%为高分化至中分化腺癌。阳性淋巴结的术前侧方盆腔淋巴结中位大小显著更高(14毫米对8毫米(P=0.01))。所有患者组织学切缘均阴性。

讨论

机器人辅助LPLND是安全可行的,围手术期和短期效果良好,机器人TME对接方案的人体工程学优势可轻松转移至LPLND。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d7/10779823/2911727fac54/jcm-13-00090-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d7/10779823/9d322d1e1609/jcm-13-00090-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d7/10779823/92deae02cdc4/jcm-13-00090-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d7/10779823/e1c0863b7e7b/jcm-13-00090-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d7/10779823/2911727fac54/jcm-13-00090-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d7/10779823/9d322d1e1609/jcm-13-00090-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d7/10779823/92deae02cdc4/jcm-13-00090-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d7/10779823/e1c0863b7e7b/jcm-13-00090-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d7/10779823/2911727fac54/jcm-13-00090-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Robotic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Rectal Cancer: A Feasibility Study from a European Centre.机器人辅助直肠癌侧方盆腔淋巴结清扫术:来自欧洲某中心的可行性研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 23;13(1):90. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010090.
2
Robotic pelvic side-wall dissection and en-bloc excision for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer: outcomes on feasibility and safety.机器人骨盆侧腹壁解剖和整块切除局部晚期和复发性直肠癌:可行性和安全性的结果。
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Sep;92(9):2185-2191. doi: 10.1111/ans.17757. Epub 2022 May 12.
3
Robotic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection after chemoradiation for rectal cancer: a Western perspective.直肠癌放化疗后机器人辅助侧方盆腔淋巴结清扫术:西方视角
Colorectal Dis. 2020 Dec;22(12):2049-2056. doi: 10.1111/codi.15350. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
4
Robotic and laparoscopic salvage lateral pelvic node dissection for the treatment of recurrent rectal cancer.机器人辅助和腹腔镜下侧盆淋巴结挽救性切除术治疗复发性直肠癌。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4954-4961. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10000-5. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
5
Long-term clinical outcomes of total mesorectal excision and selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for advanced low rectal cancer: a comparative study of a robotic versus laparoscopic approach.全直肠系膜切除术和选择性侧方盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗晚期低位直肠癌的长期临床结局:机器人手术与腹腔镜手术方法的比较研究
Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Apr;25(4):413-423. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02383-7. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
6
Selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection: a comparative study of the robotic versus laparoscopic approach.选择性侧盆腔淋巴结清扫术:机器人与腹腔镜方法的对比研究。
Surg Endosc. 2018 May;32(5):2466-2473. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5948-4. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
7
Comparison between preoperative chemoradiotherapy and lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in clinical T3 low rectal cancer without enlarged lateral lymph nodes.术前放化疗与未发生侧方淋巴结肿大的 T3 期低位直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的比较。
Colorectal Dis. 2023 Jun;25(6):1153-1162. doi: 10.1111/codi.16535. Epub 2023 Mar 18.
8
Short term outcomes of minimally invasive selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for low rectal cancer.低位直肠癌微创选择性侧方盆腔淋巴结清扫术的短期疗效
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Apr 27;12(4):178-189. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v12.i4.178.
9
[Short-term efficacy of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for mid-low advanced rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis].[机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除术联合或不联合侧方淋巴结清扫治疗中低位进展期直肠癌的短期疗效:一项倾向评分匹配分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 25;23(4):370-376. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20190725-00289.
10
Robotic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Could Harvest More Lateral Pelvic Lymph Nodes over Laparoscopic Approach for Mid-to-Low Rectal Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Cohort Study.机器人辅助侧方盆腔淋巴结清扫术相较于腹腔镜手术可获取更多中低位直肠癌侧方盆腔淋巴结:一项多机构回顾性队列研究
Biomedicines. 2023 May 27;11(6):1556. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11061556.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic Beyond Total Mesorectal Excision (bTME) for locally advanced and recurrent anorectal cancer: a systematic review.机器人辅助超全直肠系膜切除术(bTME)治疗局部晚期和复发性肛管直肠癌:一项系统评价
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jul 16;19(1):397. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02573-1.
2
Advancement of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging technology in laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在直肠癌腹腔镜手术中的进展
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Apr 27;17(4):104020. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.104020.
3
Robotic-Assisted Colon Cancer Surgery: Faster Recovery and Less Pain Compared to Laparoscopy in a Retrospective Propensity-Matched Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Feasibility of robotic assisted bladder sparing pelvic exenteration for locally advanced rectal cancer: A single institution case series.机器人辅助膀胱保留盆腔廓清术治疗局部晚期直肠癌的可行性:单机构病例系列研究
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Apr 27;12(4):190-196. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v12.i4.190.
2
Laparoscopic and robotic lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer.腹腔镜和机器人辅助直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫术。
Surg Today. 2020 Mar;50(3):209-216. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-01958-z. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
3
Advantages of using a robotic stapler in rectal cancer surgery.
机器人辅助结肠癌手术:一项回顾性倾向匹配研究表明,与腹腔镜手术相比,恢复更快且疼痛更少。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 13;17(2):243. doi: 10.3390/cancers17020243.
4
Onset and prognostic features of anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing radical surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer.新辅助放化疗后行根治性手术的直肠癌患者吻合口漏的发病情况及预后特征
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Dec 27;16(12):3710-3719. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i12.3710.
5
Initial experience and results of robotic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in locally advanced rectal cancer-a single center experience of 17 consecutive procedures.局部进展期直肠癌机器人辅助侧方盆腔淋巴结清扫术的初步经验与结果——连续17例手术的单中心经验
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Dec 17;39(1):204. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04782-w.
使用机器人吻合器进行直肠癌手术的优势。
J Robot Surg. 2020 Apr;14(2):365-370. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00993-4. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
4
Neoadjuvant (Chemo)radiotherapy With Total Mesorectal Excision Only Is Not Sufficient to Prevent Lateral Local Recurrence in Enlarged Nodes: Results of the Multicenter Lateral Node Study of Patients With Low cT3/4 Rectal Cancer.仅新辅助(化疗)放疗联合全直肠系膜切除术不足以预防扩大淋巴结中的侧方局部复发:低位 cT3/4 直肠癌患者多中心侧方淋巴结研究的结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan 1;37(1):33-43. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.00032. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
5
Lateral Node Dissection in Rectal Cancer in the Era of Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Step-by-Step Description for the Surgeon Unacquainted with This Complex Procedure with the Use of the Laparoscopic Approach.腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫术:为不熟悉该复杂手术的外科医师提供的分步描述
Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Oct;61(10):1237-1240. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001182.
6
Robotic rectal surgery has advantages over laparoscopic surgery in selected patients and centres.对于特定患者和特定中心而言,机器人直肠手术比腹腔镜手术具有优势。
Colorectal Dis. 2018 Oct;20(10):845-853. doi: 10.1111/codi.14367.
7
Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor after rectal cancer surgery: A large population-based retrospective study.直肠癌手术后环周切缘作为预后因素:一项大型基于人群的回顾性研究。
Cancer Med. 2018 Aug;7(8):3673-3681. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1662. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
8
Selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection: a comparative study of the robotic versus laparoscopic approach.选择性侧盆腔淋巴结清扫术:机器人与腹腔镜方法的对比研究。
Surg Endosc. 2018 May;32(5):2466-2473. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5948-4. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
9
Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial.机器人辅助手术与传统腹腔镜手术对直肠癌切除患者中转开腹风险的影响:ROLARR随机临床试验
JAMA. 2017 Oct 24;318(16):1569-1580. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7219.
10
Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2016 for the treatment of colorectal cancer.日本结直肠癌学会(JSCCR)2016年结直肠癌治疗指南。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb;23(1):1-34. doi: 10.1007/s10147-017-1101-6. Epub 2017 Mar 27.