Xie Yun, Yang Xiumin, Liang Hong, Bo Hongliang, Lu Jianyun, Guo Qing, Li Li, Moon Hyoung-Jin, Li Qingfeng
From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated Medical College, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Department of Dermatovenereology, Capital Medical University, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing, China.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Jan 10;12(1):e5525. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005525. eCollection 2024 Jan.
Letibotulinum toxin A has an established efficacy and safety profile for aesthetic treatment of glabellar wrinkles. This study was conducted to demonstrate the noninferiority of letibotulinum toxin A versus onabotulinum toxin A in improving the appearance of moderate-to-severe glabellar wrinkles in Chinese patients.
This phase-III multicenter, randomized, parallel positive control, double-blinded study compared the efficacy and safety of letibotulinum toxin A and onabotulinum toxin A. Eligible participants were randomized 3:1 to receive 20 U of letibotulinum toxin A or onabotulinum toxin A and were observed for 16 weeks postinjection. The primary endpoint was noninferiority in the proportion of study participants receiving a score of 0 or 1 for glabellar wrinkles on a four-point photographic evaluation scale, as assessed by an institution evaluator at maximum frown at week 4. Secondary endpoints included assessments at rest, photographic assessment of efficacy, and subjective self-assessment of the study participants.
The proportion of participants (N = 500) receiving a score of 0 or 1 at maximum frown by the institution evaluator at week 4 was 88.49% for letibotulinum toxin A and 87.39% for onabotulinum toxin A (difference, 1.10%; 95% confidence interval, -5.02 to 8.82; = 0.7469). No significant differences were observed between the treatments for secondary efficacy or safety endpoints. Participants' self-assessment and satisfaction tended to be higher for letibotulinum toxin A than onabotulinum toxin A.
Letibotulinum toxin A is noninferior to onabotulinum toxin A in improving the appearance of moderate-to-severe glabellar wrinkles in Chinese patients.
左型肉毒毒素A在眉间纹的美容治疗方面已确立了疗效和安全性。本研究旨在证明在中国患者中,左型肉毒毒素A在改善中重度眉间纹外观方面不劣于A型肉毒毒素。
本III期多中心、随机、平行阳性对照、双盲研究比较了左型肉毒毒素A和A型肉毒毒素的疗效和安全性。符合条件的参与者按3:1随机分组,分别接受20 U左型肉毒毒素A或A型肉毒毒素,并在注射后观察16周。主要终点是在第4周由机构评估员在最大皱眉时根据四点照片评估量表对眉间纹评分为0或1的研究参与者比例的非劣效性。次要终点包括静息时的评估、疗效的照片评估以及研究参与者的主观自我评估。
在第4周,机构评估员在最大皱眉时评分为0或1的参与者比例(N = 500),左型肉毒毒素A组为88.49%,A型肉毒毒素组为87.39%(差异为1.10%;95%置信区间为-5.02至8.82;P = 0.7469)。在次要疗效或安全性终点方面,各治疗组之间未观察到显著差异。左型肉毒毒素A组参与者的自我评估和满意度往往高于A型肉毒毒素组。
在中国患者中,左型肉毒毒素A在改善中重度眉间纹外观方面不劣于A型肉毒毒素。