Schwalbe Daria, Timmermann Connie, Gregersen Trine A, Steffensen Sune Vork, Ammentorp Jette
Center for Human Interactivity, Department of Culture and Communication, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Centre for Human Interactivity, Department of Language, Culture, History and Communication, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024 Jan 9;11:23821205231223319. doi: 10.1177/23821205231223319. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
The aim of this study was to conduct and evaluate the Blended Learning communication skills training program. The key objective was to investigate (i) how clinical intervention studies can be designed to include cognitive, organizational, and interactive processes, and (ii) how researchers and practitioners could work with integrated methods to support the desired change.
The method combined design and implementation of a 12-week Blended Learning communication skills training program based on the Calgary-Cambridge Guide. The training was implemented in a patient clinic at a Danish university hospital and targeted all healthcare professionals at the clinic. Cognitive ethnography was used to document and evaluate healthcare professionals' implementation and individual competency development, and support the design of in-situ simulation training scenarios.
Thirteen participants completed the program. The synergy within the teams, as well as the opportunities for participants to coordinate, share, discuss, and reflect on the received knowledge with a colleague or on-site researcher, affected learning positively. The knowledge transfer process was affected by negative feedback loops, such as time shortages, issues with concept development and transfer, disjuncture between the expectations of participants and instructors of the overall course structure, as well as participant insecurity and a gradual loss of motivation and compliance.
We propose a novel 3-step model for clinical interventions based on our findings and literature review. This model will effectively support the implementation of educational interventions in health care by narrowing the theory-practice gap. It will also stimulate desired change in individual behavior and organizational culture over time. Furthermore, it will work for the benefit of the clinic and may be more suitable for the implementation of communication projects than, for example, randomized setups.
本研究旨在开展并评估混合式学习沟通技能培训项目。主要目标是调查:(i)临床干预研究如何设计以纳入认知、组织和互动过程;(ii)研究人员和从业者如何运用综合方法来支持期望的变革。
该方法结合了基于卡尔加里 - 剑桥指南的为期12周的混合式学习沟通技能培训项目的设计与实施。培训在丹麦一所大学医院的患者诊所开展,面向该诊所的所有医护人员。认知民族志用于记录和评估医护人员的实施情况以及个人能力发展,并支持现场模拟培训场景的设计。
13名参与者完成了该项目。团队内部的协同作用,以及参与者与同事或现场研究人员协调、分享、讨论和反思所学知识的机会,对学习产生了积极影响。知识转移过程受到负面反馈循环的影响,如时间短缺、概念发展和转移问题、参与者对整体课程结构的期望与教师期望之间的脱节,以及参与者的不安全感和动力与依从性的逐渐丧失。
基于我们的研究结果和文献综述,我们提出了一种新颖的临床干预三步模型。该模型将通过缩小理论与实践差距,有效支持医疗保健领域教育干预的实施。随着时间的推移,它还将激发个人行为和组织文化中期望的变革。此外,它将对诊所有所助益,并且可能比例如随机设置更适合沟通项目的实施。