Verma Luvneet, Turk Tarek, Dennett Liz, Dytoc Marlene
Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Syrian Arab Red Crescent Hospital, Ministry of Health, Damascus, Syria.
J Cutan Med Surg. 2024 Mar-Apr;28(2):153-157. doi: 10.1177/12034754231223694. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
Telemedicine use has been increasing especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Various studies have outlined benefits of telemedicine including improving health equity, reducing wait times, and cost-effectiveness. Skin diseases such as atopic dermatitis (AD) may potentially be managed via telemedicine. However, there are no evidence-based recommendations for best practices in telemedicine for assessing AD patients. The objective of this review is to assess and summarize current evidence on telemedicine modalities for AD. This review will assess patient outcomes from various telemedicine models for AD. A review protocol was developed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Two reviewers independently screened potential studies and extracted data. Studies were included if they evaluated any telemedicine assessment for AD. Of 2719 identified records, 5 reports were included. Two reports used the direct-access online model, 1 used web-based consultation, 1 used e-health through a personal eczema portal, and 1 used an online platform and mobile application. All models were variations of the asynchronous, store and forward model. In all the included reports, teledermatology for the follow-up of patients with AD was effective and equivalent when compared to in-person appointments or standard treatment for their respective key outcome measures. However, it is unclear what the most effective teledermatology model is due to significant heterogeneity between studies. Teledermatology may serve as an important tool for triaging and follow-up of patients with AD. More studies are needed to determine which teledermatology models are most effective for virtual assessment of AD.
远程医疗的使用一直在增加,尤其是在新冠疫情期间。各种研究概述了远程医疗的好处,包括改善健康公平性、减少等待时间和成本效益。特应性皮炎(AD)等皮肤病可能可以通过远程医疗进行管理。然而,对于评估AD患者的远程医疗最佳实践,尚无基于证据的建议。本综述的目的是评估和总结当前关于AD远程医疗模式的证据。本综述将评估各种AD远程医疗模式的患者结局。根据系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明制定了综述方案。两名评审员独立筛选潜在研究并提取数据。如果研究评估了任何针对AD的远程医疗评估,则将其纳入。在2719条已识别记录中,纳入了5份报告。两份报告使用直接访问在线模式,1份使用基于网络的咨询,1份通过个人湿疹门户使用电子健康,1份使用在线平台和移动应用程序。所有模式都是异步、存储转发模式的变体。在所有纳入的报告中,与亲自预约或各自关键结局指标的标准治疗相比,AD患者随访的远程皮肤病学是有效的且等效的。然而,由于研究之间存在显著异质性,尚不清楚最有效的远程皮肤病学模式是什么。远程皮肤病学可能是AD患者分诊和随访的重要工具。需要更多研究来确定哪种远程皮肤病学模式对AD的虚拟评估最有效。