Suppr超能文献

度伐利尤单抗联合替西木单抗免疫检查点抑制与射频消融联合或不联合用于晚期胆道癌患者。

Combined immune checkpoint inhibition with durvalumab and tremelimumab with and without radiofrequency ablation in patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma.

机构信息

Gastrointestinal Malignancies Section, Thoracic and GI Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2024 Feb;13(3):e6912. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6912. Epub 2024 Jan 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current standard of care for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) is gemcitabine, cisplatin plus anti-PD1/PD-L1, but response rates are modest. The purpose of this study was to explore the efficacy and safety of durvalumab (anti-PD-L1) and tremelimumab (anti-CTLA-4), with and without an interventional radiology (IR) procedure in advanced BTC.

METHODS

Eligible patients with advanced BTC who had received or refused at least one prior line of systemic therapy were treated with tremelimumab and durvalumab for four combined doses followed by monthly durvalumab alone with and without an IR procedure until the progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity. Objective response was assessed through CT or MRI by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST, version 1.1) every 8 weeks. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded and managed. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients with advanced BTC were enrolled; 17 patients were assigned to treatment with durvalumab and tremelimumab (Durva/Treme); and 6 patients were treated with the combination of durvalumab, tremelimumab plus IR procedure (Durva/Treme + IR). The best clinical responses in the Durva/Treme arm were partial response (n = 1), stable disease (n = 5), progressive disease (n = 5), and in the Durva/Treme + IR arm: partial response (n = 0), stable disease (n = 3), progressive disease (n = 3). The median PFS was 2.2 months (95% CI: 1.3-3.1 months) in the Durva/Treme arm and 2.9 months (95% CI: 1.9-4.7 months) in the Durva/Treme + IR arm (p = 0.27). The median OS was 5.1 months (95% CI: 2.5-6.9 months) in the Durva/Treme arm and 5.8 months (95% CI: 2.9-40.1 months) in the Durva/Treme + IR arm (p = 0.31). The majority of AEs were grades 1-2.

CONCLUSION

Durva/Treme and Durva/Treme + IR showed similar efficacy. With a manageable safety profile. Larger studies are needed to fully characterize the efficacy of Durva/Treme ± IR in advanced BTC.

摘要

背景

目前晚期胆道癌(BTC)的标准治疗方法是吉西他滨、顺铂加抗 PD-1/PD-L1,但反应率并不高。本研究旨在探讨 durvalumab(抗 PD-L1)和 tremelimumab(抗 CTLA-4)联合或不联合介入放射学(IR)治疗晚期 BTC 的疗效和安全性。

方法

入组的晚期 BTC 患者接受过或拒绝过至少一线系统治疗,接受 tremelimumab 和 durvalumab 联合治疗 4 个疗程,然后每月单独使用 durvalumab,联合或不联合 IR 治疗,直至疾病进展或出现不可接受的毒性。每 8 周通过 CT 或 MRI 采用实体瘤反应评估标准(RECIST,版本 1.1)评估客观缓解。记录和管理不良反应(AE)。主要终点为 6 个月无进展生存期(PFS)。

结果

共纳入 23 例晚期 BTC 患者,17 例患者接受 durvalumab 和 tremelimumab 联合治疗(Durva/Treme 组),6 例患者接受 durvalumab、tremelimumab 联合 IR 治疗(Durva/Treme+IR 组)。Durva/Treme 组的最佳临床反应为部分缓解(n=1)、稳定疾病(n=5)、疾病进展(n=5),Durva/Treme+IR 组为部分缓解(n=0)、稳定疾病(n=3)、疾病进展(n=3)。Durva/Treme 组中位 PFS 为 2.2 个月(95%CI:1.3-3.1 个月),Durva/Treme+IR 组为 2.9 个月(95%CI:1.9-4.7 个月)(p=0.27)。Durva/Treme 组中位 OS 为 5.1 个月(95%CI:2.5-6.9 个月),Durva/Treme+IR 组为 5.8 个月(95%CI:2.9-40.1 个月)(p=0.31)。大多数 AE 为 1-2 级。

结论

Durva/Treme 和 Durva/Treme+IR 疗效相似,安全性可管理。需要更大规模的研究来充分评估 Durva/Treme±IR 在晚期 BTC 中的疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c73/10904979/973134bd43a0/CAM4-13-e6912-g004.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验