Animal and Bioscience Research Department, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc Grange, Co. Meath, Ireland.
School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, University of Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland.
J Anim Sci. 2024 Jan 3;102. doi: 10.1093/jas/skad421.
Research into the potential use of various dietary feed supplements to reduce methane (CH4) production from ruminants has proliferated in recent years. In this study, two 8-wk long experiments were conducted with mature ewes and incorporated the use of a variety of natural dietary feed supplements offered either independently or in combination. Both experiments followed a randomized complete block design. Ewes were offered a basal diet in the form of ad libitum access to grass silage supplemented with 0.5 kg concentrates/ewe/d. The entire daily dietary concentrate allocation, incorporating the respective feed supplement, was offered each morning, and this was followed by the daily silage allocation. In experiment 1, the experimental diets contained 1) no supplementation (CON), 2) Ascophyllum nodosum (SW), 3) A. nodosum extract (EX1), 4) a blend of garlic and citrus extracts (GAR), and 5) a blend of essential oils (EO). In experiment 2, the experimental diets contained 1) no supplementation (CON), 2) A. nodosum extract (EX2), 3) soya oil (SO), and 4) a combination of EX2 and SO (EXSO). Twenty ewes per treatment were individually housed during both experiments. Methane was measured using portable accumulation chambers. Rumen fluid was collected at the end of both experiments for subsequent volatile fatty acid (VFA) and ammonia analyses. Data were analyzed using mixed models ANOVA (PROC MIXED, SAS v9.4). Statistically significant differences between treatment means were considered when P < 0.05. Dry matter intake was not affected by diet in either experiment (P > 0.05). Ewes offered EO tended to have an increased feed:gain ratio relative to CON (P < 0.10) and SO tended to increase the average daily gain (P < 0.10) which resulted in animals having a higher final body weight (P < 0.05) than CON. Ewes offered EX1 and SO emitted 9% less CH4 g/d than CON. The only dietary treatment to have an effect on rumen fermentation variables relative to CON was SW, which enhanced total VFA production (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the A. nodosum extract had inconsistent results on CH4 emissions whereby EX1 reduced CH4 g/d while EX2 had no mitigating effect on CH4 production, likely due to the differences in PT content reported for EX1 and EX2. SO was the only dietary feed supplement assessed in the current study that enhanced animal performance whilst mitigating daily CH4 production.
近年来,人们对各种饲料添加剂在减少反刍动物甲烷(CH4)排放方面的潜在应用进行了大量研究。在这项研究中,用成熟的母羊进行了两项为期 8 周的实验,并结合使用了各种天然饲料添加剂,这些添加剂单独或组合使用。两个实验都采用随机完全区组设计。母羊可以自由采食干草青贮饲料,并补充 0.5kg 浓缩饲料/只/天。每天早上都会提供包含相应饲料添加剂的整个日配给浓缩饲料,然后再分配每日青贮饲料。在实验 1 中,实验饲料包含 1)不添加任何物质(CON)、2)裙带菜(SW)、3)裙带菜提取物(EX1)、4)大蒜和柑橘提取物混合物(GAR)和 5)精油混合物(EO)。在实验 2 中,实验饲料包含 1)不添加任何物质(CON)、2)裙带菜提取物(EX2)、3)大豆油(SO)和 4)EX2 和 SO 的混合物(EXSO)。两个实验中,每个处理 20 只母羊单独饲养。使用便携式积累室测量甲烷。在两个实验结束时收集瘤胃液,用于随后的挥发性脂肪酸(VFA)和氨分析。使用混合模型方差分析(PROC MIXED,SAS v9.4)分析数据。当 P<0.05 时,认为处理均值之间存在统计学差异。在两个实验中,饲料对干物质摄入量没有影响(P>0.05)。与 CON 相比,喂食 EO 的母羊的饲料:增重比有增加的趋势(P<0.10),而 SO 则增加了平均日增重(P<0.10),导致动物的最终体重高于 CON(P<0.05)。与 CON 相比,喂食 EX1 和 SO 的母羊每天排放的 CH4 减少了 9%。唯一对 CON 瘤胃发酵变量有影响的饲料处理是 SW,它增加了总 VFA 的产生(P<0.05)。总之,裙带菜提取物对 CH4 排放的结果不一致,EX1 减少了 CH4/g/d,而 EX2 对 CH4 产生没有缓解作用,这可能是由于 EX1 和 EX2 报告的 PT 含量不同。在本研究中评估的唯一饲料添加剂 SO 增强了动物性能,同时减轻了每日 CH4 产量。