Arrhythmology Unit, Ospedale Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina-Gemelli Isola, Via Ponte Quattro Capi, 39, 00186, Rome, Italy.
Abbott Medical, Via Paracelso 20, 20864, Agrate Brianza, Italy.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024 Sep;67(6):1365-1376. doi: 10.1007/s10840-023-01721-7. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) represents a challenge for the electrophysiologist and there are still divergences regarding the best ablative approach to adopt. Create a new map of the duration of atrial bipolar electrograms (Atrial Electrogram DUration Map, AEDUM) to recognize a functional substrate during sinus rhythm and guide a patient-tailored ablative strategy for PsAF.
Forty PsAF subjects were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either for PVI alone (Group B) or PVI+AEDUM areas ablation (Group B). A cohort of 15 patients without AF history undergoing left-sided accessory pathway ablation was used as a control group (Group A). In all patients, voltage and AEDUM maps were created during sinus rhythm. The minimum follow-up was 12 months, with rhythm monitoring via 48-h ECG Holter or by implantable cardiac device.
Electrogram (EGM) duration was higher in Group B than in Group A (49±16.2ms vs 34.2±3.8ms; p-value<0.001). In Group B the mean cumulative AEDUM area was 21.8±8.2cm; no difference between the two subgroups was observed (22.3±9.1cm vs 21.2±7.2cm; p-value=0.45). The overall bipolar voltage recorded inside the AEDUM areas was lower than in the remaining atrial areas [median: 1.30mV (IQR: 0.71-2.38mV) vs 1.54mV (IQR: 0.79-2.97mV); p-value: <0.001)]. Low voltage areas (<0.5mV) were recorded in three (7.5%) patients in Group B. During the follow-up [median 511 days (376-845days)] patients who underwent PVI-only experienced more AF recurrence than those receiving a tailored approach (65% vs 35%; p-value= 0.04).
All PsAF patients exhibited AEDUM areas. An ablation approach targeting these areas resulted in a more effective strategy compared with PVI only.
持续性心房颤动(PsAF)的导管消融对电生理医生来说是一个挑战,对于采用哪种最佳消融方法仍存在分歧。创建心房双极电图持续时间的新图谱(Atrial Electrogram DUration Map,AEDUM),以在窦性节律时识别功能基质,并为 PsAF 患者量身定制消融策略。
将 40 例 PsAF 患者按 1:1 比例分为单纯行肺静脉隔离(Group B)或行肺静脉隔离+AEDUM 区域消融(Group B)。一组 15 例无房颤病史的左侧旁路消融患者作为对照组(Group A)。所有患者均在窦性节律时创建电压和 AEDUM 图谱。最短随访时间为 12 个月,通过 48 小时心电图动态监测或植入式心脏装置进行节律监测。
与 Group A(49±16.2ms)相比,Group B 的电图(EGM)持续时间更高(34.2±3.8ms;p 值<0.001)。在 Group B 中,平均累积 AEDUM 面积为 21.8±8.2cm;两个亚组之间无差异(22.3±9.1cm vs 21.2±7.2cm;p 值=0.45)。在 AEDUM 区域内记录的双极电压总体上低于剩余心房区域[中位数:1.30mV(IQR:0.71-2.38mV)vs 1.54mV(IQR:0.79-2.97mV);p 值:<0.001)]。在 Group B 中有 3 名(7.5%)患者记录到低电压区域(<0.5mV)。在随访期间[中位数 511 天(376-845 天)],仅行肺静脉隔离的患者比接受个体化治疗的患者发生更多的房颤复发(65%比 35%;p 值=0.04)。
所有 PsAF 患者均显示出 AEDUM 区域。与单纯行肺静脉隔离相比,针对这些区域的消融方法可实现更有效的策略。