文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

确保通讯冗余,并使用多条通讯线路为机器人远程手术建立远程指导系统。

Ensuring communication redundancy and establishing a telementoring system for robotic telesurgery using multiple communication lines.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-Cho Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan.

Committee for Promotion of Remote Surgery Implementation, Japan Surgical Society, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2024 Jan 11;18(1):9. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01792-8.


DOI:10.1007/s11701-023-01792-8
PMID:38206522
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10784335/
Abstract

Assuring communication redundancy during the interruption and establishing appropriate teaching environments for local surgeons are essential to making robotic telesurgery mainstream. This study analyzes robotic telesurgery with telementoring using standard domestic telecommunication carriers. Can multiple carriers guarantee redundancy with interruptions? Three commercial optical fiber lines connected Hirosaki University and Mutsu General Hospitals, 150 km apart. Using Riverfield, Inc. equipment, Hirosaki had a cockpit, while both Mutsu used both a cockpit and a surgeon's console. Experts provided telementoring evaluating 14 trainees, using objective indices for operation time and errors. Subjective questionnaires addressed image quality and surgical operability. Eighteen participants performed telesurgery using combined lines from two/three telecommunication carriers. Manipulation: over 30 min, lines were cut and restored every three minutes per task. Subjects were to press a switch when noticing image quality or operability changes. Mean time to task completion was 1510 (1186-1960) seconds: local surgeons alone and 1600 (1152-2296) seconds for those under remote instructor supervision, including expert intervention time. There was no significant difference (p = 0.86). The mean error count was 0.92 (0-3) for local surgeons and 0.42 (0-2) with remote instructors. Image quality and operability questionnaires found no significant differences. Results communication companies A, B, and C: the A/B combination incurred 0.17 (0-1) presses of the environment change switch, B/C had 0, and C/A received 0.67 (0-3), showing no significant difference among provider combinations. Combining multiple communication lines guarantees communication redundancy and enables robotic telementoring with enhanced communication security.

摘要

确保中断期间的通讯冗余,并为当地外科医生建立适当的教学环境,对于将机器人远程手术变为主流至关重要。本研究使用标准的国内电信运营商分析带远程指导的机器人远程手术。多个运营商能否通过中断来保证冗余性?三条商业光纤线将相隔 150 公里的弘前大学和十和田综合医院连接起来。弘前大学使用 Riverfield, Inc. 的设备建立驾驶舱,而十和田综合医院则同时使用驾驶舱和外科医生控制台。专家使用客观指标(操作时间和错误)评估了 14 名学员的远程指导效果。主观问卷则评估了图像质量和手术可操作性。18 名参与者使用来自两个/三个电信运营商的组合线路进行远程手术。操作:超过 30 分钟,每三分钟中断一次并恢复,受试者在发现图像质量或手术可操作性变化时按下开关。完成任务的平均时间为 1510(1186-1960)秒:当地外科医生单独操作的时间和在远程指导监督下(包括专家干预时间)的时间为 1600(1152-2296)秒。两者之间没有显著差异(p=0.86)。本地外科医生的平均错误计数为 0.92(0-3),远程指导教师的平均错误计数为 0.42(0-2)。图像质量和可操作性问卷没有发现显著差异。与通信公司 A、B 和 C 的结果:A/B 组合的环境变化开关按压次数为 0.17(0-1),B/C 为 0,C/A 为 0.67(0-3),表明供应商组合之间没有显著差异。组合多个通信线路可保证通讯冗余,并可实现增强通讯安全性的机器人远程指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbde/10784335/cfe9f596bd2f/11701_2023_1792_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbde/10784335/fec2c81a85ac/11701_2023_1792_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbde/10784335/f75480385450/11701_2023_1792_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbde/10784335/cfe9f596bd2f/11701_2023_1792_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbde/10784335/fec2c81a85ac/11701_2023_1792_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbde/10784335/f75480385450/11701_2023_1792_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbde/10784335/cfe9f596bd2f/11701_2023_1792_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Ensuring communication redundancy and establishing a telementoring system for robotic telesurgery using multiple communication lines.

J Robot Surg. 2024-1-11

[2]
Real-time telementoring with 3D drawing annotation in robotic surgery.

Surg Endosc. 2023-12

[3]
Construction of redundant communications to enhance safety against communication interruptions during robotic remote surgery.

Sci Rep. 2023-7-4

[4]
Reappraisal of telesurgery in the era of high-speed, high-bandwidth, secure communications: Evaluation of surgical performance in local and remote environments.

Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2022-8-12

[5]
Technical evaluation of robotic tele-cholecystectomy: a randomized single-blind controlled pilot study.

J Robot Surg. 2023-6

[6]
Field experiment of a telesurgery system using a surgical robot with haptic feedback.

Surg Today. 2024-4

[7]
Triple-console robotic telesurgery: first impressions and future impact.

J Robot Surg. 2024-10-26

[8]
Telesurgery and telesurgical support using a double-surgeon cockpit system allowing manipulation from two locations.

Surg Endosc. 2023-8

[9]
Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results.

Surg Endosc. 2002-10

[10]
Telementoring and Telesurgery for Minimally Invasive Procedures.

J Urol. 2017-6-26

引用本文的文献

[1]
Telesurgery unleashed: redefining surgical presence in the age of intelligent robotics.

J Robot Surg. 2025-8-6

[2]
Best practices in telesurgery: framework and recommendations from the society of robotic surgery (SRS) for safe and effective implementation.

J Robot Surg. 2025-7-11

[3]
Clinical practice guidelines for telesurgery 2022 : Committee for the promotion of remote surgery implementation, Japan Surgical Society.

Surg Today. 2024-8

本文引用的文献

[1]
Construction of redundant communications to enhance safety against communication interruptions during robotic remote surgery.

Sci Rep. 2023-7-4

[2]
Telesurgery and telesurgical support using a double-surgeon cockpit system allowing manipulation from two locations.

Surg Endosc. 2023-8

[3]
Reappraisal of telesurgery in the era of high-speed, high-bandwidth, secure communications: Evaluation of surgical performance in local and remote environments.

Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2022-8-12

[4]
Technical evaluation of robotic tele-cholecystectomy: a randomized single-blind controlled pilot study.

J Robot Surg. 2023-6

[5]
Verification of delay time and image compression thresholds for telesurgery.

Asian J Endosc Surg. 2023-4

[6]
Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022-11

[7]
Impact of the suboptimal communication network environment on telerobotic surgery performance and surgeon fatigue.

PLoS One. 2022

[8]
Tele-assessment of bandwidth limitation for remote robotics surgery.

Surg Today. 2022-11

[9]
Short-term outcomes in robot-assisted compared to laparoscopic colon cancer resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Surg Endosc. 2022-1

[10]
Social implementation of a remote surgery system in Japan: a field experiment using a newly developed surgical robot via a commercial network.

Surg Today. 2022-4

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索