Department of Hematology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Department of Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Blood Adv. 2024 Feb 27;8(4):968-977. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010704.
Large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) carrying MYC rearrangement, alone or together with BCL2 and/or BCL6 translocations, have shown a poor prognosis when treated with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in the HIV population. Scanty data are available on the prevalence and prognostic impact of MYC rearrangements in HIV-associated LBCL. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the clinical effect of MYC rearrangement in HIV-associated LBCL. We evaluated clinical characteristics, treatment received, and outcome of LBCL in patients with HIV with MYC rearrangement (MYC+) and without MYC rearrangement (MYC-). A total of 155 patients with HIV who had received fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis for MYC were enrolled in 11 European centers: 43 with MYC+ and 112 MYC-. Among patients with MYC, 10 had double-/triple-hit lymphomas, and 33 had isolated MYC rearrangement (single-hit lymphoma). Patients with MYC+ had more frequently advanced stage, >2 extranodal site at presentation, and higher proliferative index. There were no significant differences in overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) between the 2 groups. However, patients with MYC+ received more frequently intensive chemotherapy (iCT) (44%) than (R)CHOP alone (35%) or infusional treatment (DA-EPOCH-R and R-CDE) (19%). Among patients with MYC+, those who received iCT achieved a better outcome than patients who received nonintensive treatment (complete remission, 84% vs 52%; P = .028; 5-year PFS, 66% vs 36%; P = .021). Our retrospective results suggest that HIV-associated LBCL with MYC+ could be considered for an intensive therapeutic approach whenever possible, whereas (R)CHOP seems to give inferior results in this subset of patients in terms of complete remission and PFS.
携带 MYC 重排的大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL),无论是否伴有 BCL2 和/或 BCL6 易位,在接受利妥昔单抗联合环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱和泼尼松(R-CHOP)治疗时,在 HIV 人群中预后较差。在 HIV 相关 LBCL 中,关于 MYC 重排的流行率和预后影响的数据很少。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,以评估 HIV 相关 LBCL 中 MYC 重排的临床效果。我们评估了 11 个欧洲中心的 155 例接受 HIV 荧光原位杂交分析的 LBCL 患者的临床特征、接受的治疗和结局,这些患者中 43 例有 MYC+,112 例无 MYC-。在 MYC 阳性的患者中,有 10 例为双-/三打击淋巴瘤,33 例为孤立性 MYC 重排(单打击淋巴瘤)。MYC+的患者更常出现晚期、初诊时多个结外部位受累和更高的增殖指数。两组患者的总生存和无进展生存(PFS)无显著差异。然而,MYC+的患者更常接受强化化疗(iCT)(44%)而非 R-CHOP 单药治疗(35%)或输注治疗(DA-EPOCH-R 和 R-CDE)(19%)。在 MYC+的患者中,接受 iCT 的患者比接受非强化治疗的患者获得更好的结局(完全缓解率,84%比 52%;P=0.028;5 年 PFS,66%比 36%;P=0.021)。我们的回顾性结果表明,对于携带 MYC+的 HIV 相关 LBCL,只要可能,应考虑采用强化治疗方法,而(R)CHOP 在该亚组患者中似乎在完全缓解和 PFS 方面效果较差。